2D Versus 3D Radical Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: a Prospective Randomized Trial

NCT ID: NCT02320578

Last Updated: 2015-06-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

26 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-10-31

Study Completion Date

2015-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this prospective randomized pilot study is to verify if the operative time of a Radical abdominal hysterectomy (LRH) with pelvic lymphadenectomy for early stage cervical cancer (FIGO stages IA2-IB1-IIA\<2cm) and for advanced stage cervical cancer (FIGO stages IB2-IIA\>2cm-IIB) submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with complete clinical response could be further reduced using 3D Laparoscopy (Olympus Medical Systems Corp) versus standard laparoscopy

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Radical abdominal hysterectomy (RAH) with pelvic lymphadenectomy is the standard surgical treatment for early stage cervical carcinoma FIGO stages IA2-IB1-IIA\<2cm. Since the early 90's laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy (LRH) has been suggested as surgical approach for the treatment of cervical cancer. In the recent years, many institutions have begun to consider it an attractive technique and to study its feasibility and safety. Most of these studies have shown that LRH is relatively more time-consuming than standard laparotomy and ranges from 90 to 420 minutes according to surgeons' experience and different techniques adopted to achieve hemostasis, resect the parametrium and uterosacrals. Spirtos et al. demonstrated that staplers could reduce mean operation time from 253 to 205 minutes if compared to argon beam coagulator. Moreover, the pulsed bipolar system was associated with significant reduction in operative time in comparison with the conventional bipolar system (mean, 172 minutes vs 229 minutes; P \< 0.001). The largest series of LRH reported from a single institution by Puntambekar et al included 248 patients and described the "Pune technique" (anterior and posterior peritoneal U cuts, early dissection of the rectovaginal space, fully mobilization of the uterus, resection of the cardinal and uterosacral ligaments with Ligasure system (Ligasure Vessel Sealing System; Valleylab, Tyco Healthcare, Boulder, CO)), obtaining a very short mean operative time (mean, 92 minutes; range 6-120 minutes).

A recent review on laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy including 17 studies reported a mean operating time of 202 minutes \[range, 184-221 minutes\] in the group of LRH, which matches with our experience of 210 min (range 180-240), using conventional bipolar electrosurgery.

This prospective randomized pilot study is aimed to verify if the operative time of a LRH with pelvic lymphadenectomy for early stage cervical cancer (FIGO stages IA2-IB1-IIA\<2cm) and for advanced stage cervical cancer (FIGO stages IB2-IIA\>2cm-IIB) submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with complete clinical response could be further reduced using 3D Laparoscopy (Olympus Medical Systems Corp) vs. standard laparoscopy.

Saving operative time would mean shorter anesthesia and faster recovery, further improving the safety profile of the laparoscopic approach in the treatment of cervical cancer.

Secondary endopoints of this comparison are incidence of intra- or postoperative complications (Cardiac, Respiratory, Neurological, Gastrointestinal, Renal, Fever, Wound or other Infection, Lymphocele), estimated blood loss, days of hospitalization and costs for the health care system.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Uterine Cervical Neoplasms Laparoscopic Surgical Procedures

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

3D Laparoscopy

Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy are performed with 3D Laparoscopic technology.

A 10 mm port is inserted at the umbilicus for the telescope. Once pneumoperitoneum (12 mmHg) is achieved, intra-abdominal visualization will be obtained with a 0° high-definition 3D telescope. Two additional 5 mm ports are placed under direct visualization. One more 5- mm trocar is inserted in the right mid abdomen at the level of the umbilicus. The instruments used include bipolar grasper, monopolar scissors, monopolar hook, various graspers and a suction irrigation system.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

3D Laparoscopy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

3D Laparoscopy approach

Standard Laparoscopy

Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy are performed with standard laparoscopy technology. A 10 mm port is inserted at the umbilicus for the telescope. Once pneumoperitoneum (12 mmHg) is achieved, intra-abdominal visualization will be obtained with a 0° high-definition telescope. Two additional 5 mm ports are placed under direct visualization. One more 5 mm trocar is inserted in the right mid abdomen at the level of the umbilicus. The instruments used include bipolar grasper, monopolar scissors, monopolar hook, various graspers and a suction irrigation system.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard Laparoscopy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Standard laparoscopy approach

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

3D Laparoscopy

3D Laparoscopy approach

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Standard Laparoscopy

Standard laparoscopy approach

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≤ 75 years
* Patient's informed consent
* American Society of Anesthesiologists: \< class III or IV
* No actual pregnancies or P.I.D.
* No previous major abdominal surgical procedures
* Early stage cervical cancer (FIGO stages IA2-IB1-IIA\<2cm) and advanced stage cervical cancer (FIGO stages IB2-IIA\>2cm-IIB) submitted to NACT with complete clinical response
* No previous radiotherapy on the pelvic field
* No uterine size larger than conform 10 weeks gestation
Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fanfani, Francesco, M.D.

INDIV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Fagotti, Anna, M.D.

INDIV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Catholic University of the Sacred Heart

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Prof. Giovanni Scambia

Director, Dip per la Tutela della Salute della Donna e della Vita Nascente, del Bambino e dell'Adolescente

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Catholic University of the Sacred Heart

Rome, Italy, Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

3D vs 2D Cervix

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.