Laparoscopic or Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer(Stage IB3,IIA2)

NCT ID: NCT04939831

Last Updated: 2021-11-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1104 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-05-12

Study Completion Date

2026-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to confirm whether there is a difference between laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) and abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) in patient survival for Cervical Cancer (Stage IB3, IIA2).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The purpose of this study is to compare LRH (or robotic-assisted) and ARH in patients with cervical cancer (Stage IB3, IIA2), by a multicenter stratified randomized controlled study, mainly including the following aspects:

1. To compare the differences in PFS and OS between patients receiving LRH and ARH.
2. To investigate whether PFS and OS in LRH can be improved by more rigorous specification of surgical details (including tumor-free principles and standard surgical scopes).
3. To assess postoperative complications and quality of survival.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cervical Cancer

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Cervical Cancer Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

the group of LRH

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Total Laparoscopic or Robotic Radical Hysterectomy

Intervention Type OTHER

Radical hysterectomy with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection is performed as standard type C RH by Q-M classification, including cardinal ligaments divided at pelvic sidewall and uterosacral ligaments divided at near the sacral origin and the upper 1/4 to 1/3 of the vagina.

2

the group of ARH

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Total Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy

Intervention Type OTHER

Radical hysterectomy with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection is performed as standard type C RH by Q-M classification, including cardinal ligaments divided at pelvic sidewall and uterosacral ligaments divided at near the sacral origin and the upper 1/4 to 1/3 of the vagina.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Total Laparoscopic or Robotic Radical Hysterectomy

Radical hysterectomy with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection is performed as standard type C RH by Q-M classification, including cardinal ligaments divided at pelvic sidewall and uterosacral ligaments divided at near the sacral origin and the upper 1/4 to 1/3 of the vagina.

Intervention Type OTHER

Total Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy

Radical hysterectomy with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection is performed as standard type C RH by Q-M classification, including cardinal ligaments divided at pelvic sidewall and uterosacral ligaments divided at near the sacral origin and the upper 1/4 to 1/3 of the vagina.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Clinical diagnosis of squamous carcinoma of the cervix, adenocarcinoma, squamous adenocarcinoma (Stage IB3,IIA2).
2. Age ≥ 21 years and ≤ 70 years.
3. Surgery type B and C (refer to Q-M surgical staging)
4. Normal range of liver and kidney function and blood count (specific details below) Hemoglobin \> 60g/L Platelets \> 70\*109/L Leukocytes \> 3\*109/L Creatinine \< 50mg/dL Transaminase abnormal indicators ≤ 3 Maximum value of transaminases not exceeding 3 times the corresponding normal value.
5. No history of other malignancies.
6. Non-pregnancy.
7. Physical strength classification: Karnofsky score ≥ 60;
8. Subjects voluntarily joined the study, signed the informed consent form, were compliant and cooperated with the follow-up.
9. No psychiatric disorders and other serious immune system disorders (e.g. lupus erythematosus, myasthenia gravis, HIV infection, etc.) (Note: Maximum diameter measurement of cervical lesions is based on PET-CT, or CT, or MRI)

Exclusion Criteria

1. Those who are contraindicated for various surgeries and cannot undergo surgery.
2. Patients who have received pelvic/abdominal radiotherapy irradiation or neoadjuvant chemotherapy for cervical cancer.
3. Patients with recurrent cervical cancer
4. Patients with CT, MRI or PET-CT suggesting suspicious metastasis of pelvic lymph nodes with maximum diameter \>2cm after further improvement of preoperative examination.
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Children's Hospital of Fudan University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

RenJi Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Taizhou Hospital, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hua Jiang, PHD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Hua Jiang, PHD

Role: CONTACT

Phone: (021)33189900-6529

Email: [email protected]

Xin Wu, PHD

Role: CONTACT

Phone: (021)33189900-6529

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Hua Jiang, PHD

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Wu X, Yu H, Bai Y, Hou Y, Lou W, Wang X, Zhu T, Zhang Y, Hu W, Xue X, Zhu Z, Xiang L, Li J, Fang X, Gao S, Feng H, Diao W, Zhang H, Du M, Yan W, Qiu L, Feng H, Zhu S, Du Y, Jiang H. A multicenter noninferior randomized controlled study comparing the efficacy of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer (stage IB3 and IIA2): study protocol of the LAUNCH 3 trial. Trials. 2023 Aug 18;24(1):542. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07573-w.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37592299 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FUOBGY2021-05

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id