Person-Centered Care Planning and Service Engagement

NCT ID: NCT02299492

Last Updated: 2022-11-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

570 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-09-01

Study Completion Date

2019-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This proposed study addresses the problem of service disengagement within the mental health system. No matter how effective mental health practices are now or become in the future, they are of little value should persons with mental illnesses continue to choose not to receive them. Consumers have attributed their disengagement from care to having poor alliances with care providers, including experiences of not being listened to and not being offered the opportunity to make decisions and collaborate in their own treatment. Person-centered care planning is a field-tested intervention designed to maximize consumer choice and ownership of the treatment process. Providers collaborate with consumers to develop customized plans that identify life goals and potential barriers to achieving them. The proposed study tests the effectiveness of Person-Centered Care Planning (PCCP) designed to target barriers and efficiently implement PCCP throughout an agency. By conducting a randomized controlled trial with 14 community mental health clinics from two states, the study will assess whether PCCP improves service engagement and consumer outcomes. The study will also utilize qualitative methods to understand how care planning impacts service engagement and how implementation processes influence organizational and provider level behavior. Designed to bridge the science to services gap, this study focuses on two priorities identified by the NIMH Diversion of Services and Intervention Research: developing models and methods to implement effective mental health services in the community and the study of personalized mental health care.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Service disengagement is one of the most pervasive and challenging problems currently facing the mental health care system. No matter how effective mental health services are now or become in the future, they are of little value should persons with mental illnesses continue to choose not to receive them. Consumers have attributed their disengagement from care to having poor alliances with care providers, including experiences of not being listened to and not being offered the opportunity to make decisions and collaborate in their own treatment. In response, the mental health system is moving toward a more person-centered model, based upon recovery principles, to engage consumers more actively in their care. While states have embraced this model in theory, they are now looking for guidance as to how best to implement this model in practice, including how to maximize service quality and consumer outcomes given the limited resources available to them for workforce development.

The proposed study tackles this pressing issue by testing the effectiveness of Person-Centered Care Planning (PCCP). By targeting treatment planning - a process that is common across clinical interventions - PCCP has the potential to enhance evidence based practices. PCCP is a field-tested intervention designed to maximize consumer choice and ownership of the treatment process.Providers collaborate with consumers to develop customized plans that identify life goals and potential barriers to achieving them. PCCP is implemented agency-wide through clinical supervisor trainings, which provide an experiential teaching program and tools to translate the practice to frontline clinicians.

Our controlled trial will randomize community mental health centers from two states to receive either PCCP or treatment as usual. The study will conduct surveys of agency providers to assess the impact of PCCP on transformational leadership, recovery orientation, and organizational readiness. Provider PCCP competency associated with the intervention will be measured via provider surveys and client medical record review. Client outcomes will include service engagement, satisfaction with services, adherence, employment, housing, and social support. Client outcomes will be measured using secondary data from agency, state and federal datasets. Qualitative inquiry will be used to better understand the care planning and implementation process associated with the intervention. Focus groups will be conducted with providers and consumers in the experimental sites. The specific aims of the study are:

1. Assess the effectiveness of PCCP. H1: Relative to treatment as usual, a significantly larger proportion of participants receiving PCCP will engage in services, have greater satisfaction with services, and have improved outcomes.
2. Assess the effect of organizational factors on the implementation and effectiveness of PCCP
3. Use qualitative methods to understand how care planning impacts service engagement and how implementation processes influence organizational and provider level behavior.

Designed to bridge the science to services gap, this statewide study focuses on how agencies can bring about the wholesale transformation needed to deliver sustainable person-centered care. This study is the first of its kind to examine the synergy between PCCP, sophisticated organizational change methods, and provider level training, and to document their impact on consumer outcomes. This investigative team brings together experts in PCCP and recovery with experts in services and implementation research to generate valuable guidance for how state systems engaged in the transformation process can best use their limited resources during times of significant fiscal constraint.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Severe Mental Illness

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Person-Centered Care Planning

Arm will receive provider level training in Person Centered Care Planning

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Person Centered Care Planning

Intervention Type OTHER

PCCP is a manualized provider-based intervention that maximizes consumer choice for adults receiving mental health services. PCCP focuses on engagement and individualized care, thereby enhancing the impact of existing evidence based practices.

Treatment as Usual

Arm will receive treatment as usual in community mental health clinic

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Person Centered Care Planning

PCCP is a manualized provider-based intervention that maximizes consumer choice for adults receiving mental health services. PCCP focuses on engagement and individualized care, thereby enhancing the impact of existing evidence based practices.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Receiving services at participating community mental health clinics

Exclusion Criteria

* None
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Pennsylvania

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Yale University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

New York University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Victoria Stanhope, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

New York University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

New York University

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Stanhope V, Matthews EB. Delivering person-centered care with an electronic health record. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Aug 22;19(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0897-6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31438960 (View on PubMed)

Stanhope V, Tondora J, Davidson L, Choy-Brown M, Marcus SC. Person-centered care planning and service engagement: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015 Apr 22;16:180. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0715-0.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25897762 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PCCP-13-9762

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Taking Action for College Students
NCT06700902 RECRUITING NA