Enhancing Community Participation Through Peer-Delivered Decision Support

NCT ID: NCT06492434

Last Updated: 2025-12-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

16 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-07-01

Study Completion Date

2025-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to pilot test a peer-delivered decision support intervention ("peer decision coaching") designed to enhance decision-making about community participation among young adults with serious mental illness (SMI).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The overarching goal of this study is to pilot test a peer-delivered decision support intervention ("peer decision coaching") designed to enhance decision-making about community participation among young adults with serious mental illnesses (SMI). We will use a single-group, pre-post, convergent mixed methods design to explore implementation and whether and how the intervention impacts decision-making and community participation outcomes. We will aim to recruit 40 participants in this intervention study. This design will enable us to link themes regarding participants' experience of the intervention with quantitative measures of decision-making and community participation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Severe Mental Disorder

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Peer specialists, Decision Support Techniques, Young Adult

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Peer decision coaching arm

All participants will engage in the Peer Decision Coaching intervention.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Peer decision coaching

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Peer Decision Coaching is a brief, personalized intervention grounded in evidence-based decision- and peer support principles. During the intervention, a trained peer specialist supports the young person in identifying a decision related to community participation that they need to make, such as whether to work or go to school, helping them address decision-making needs, and assisting them with developing and implementing a decision-making plan. Ultimately, the intervention aims to support young people in pursuing their community participation interests and goals.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Peer decision coaching

Peer Decision Coaching is a brief, personalized intervention grounded in evidence-based decision- and peer support principles. During the intervention, a trained peer specialist supports the young person in identifying a decision related to community participation that they need to make, such as whether to work or go to school, helping them address decision-making needs, and assisting them with developing and implementing a decision-making plan. Ultimately, the intervention aims to support young people in pursuing their community participation interests and goals.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18-30 years of age;
* Experiencing a SMI, as determined by: (a) self-reported psychiatric diagnosis of schizophrenia-spectrum or major affective disorder, and (b) self-reported current or past functional impairment due to experiencing mental health challenges in one or more major life areas (i.e., work school, social activities)
* Able to identify at least 2 areas of community participation that individuals want to be doing more in in the next 6 months
* Current sufficiency of community participation (i.e., number of important participation areas done enough / number of important participation areas) of 50% or less.

Exclusion Criteria

* Unable to provide informed consent, as assessed by research staff using an active recall method
* limited ability to act on decisions due to self-reported legal, residential, or guardianship restrictions.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

30 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

Temple University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Elizabeth Thomas, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Temple University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Temple University

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Copeland Center for Wellness and Recovery

Brattleboro, Vermont, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

90IFRE0068

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

270034

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id