ESWL for Distal Ureteric Stone: Supine Versus Prone

NCT ID: NCT02298465

Last Updated: 2023-08-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

130 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-11-30

Study Completion Date

2027-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) for urinary stone is common and widespread nowadays. Approximately 80% of urinary stones are treated by ESWL. Traditionally distal ureteric stones are treated with ESWL in the prone position. However, as some patients cannot tolerate lying in the prone due to medical illness such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), some authors have reported using the supine approach of ESWL for treatment of distal ureter stones. No serious complications had developed in the patients who underwent supine approach. Only minor complications such as self-limiting blood in the urine, painful passage of urine, or local pain that had responded to oral painkillers. There were no serious complications encountered in children as well. In the most recent retrospective review by Tolley et al, they had revealed that patients who had underwent supine ESWL for distal ureteric stones had an improved stone-free rate compared with the traditional prone approach.

Patient with radio-opaque distal ureteric stones (stones below the sacroiliac joint) on KUB X-ray, who have opted for ESWL treatment, are randomized into two groups: one undergoing ESWL in the supine position and the other undergoing ESWL in the prone position. Patients will be observed for two hours after ESWL before being discharged. Oral painkillers as necessary will be provided to the patient. The patients will have a KUB Xray at 2 weeks post-ESWL, and then monthly afterwards if required. If there are residual stones at the 2-week follow-up, the patient will be offered ESWL again. Patients are free to withdraw from the study at any time and will continue to be managed as per usual.

The investigators aim to have 130 patients, with 65 patients in each group with an interim analyses to be performed when 66 patients have been recruited (33 patients in each group).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Previous authors have reported using the greater and lesser sciatic foramina as a pathway for the shockwaves to reach the distal ureter. No serious complications had developed in the patients who underwent transgluteal approach. Only minor complications such as self-limiting hematuria, dysuria, or pain that had responded to oral analgesics. There were no serious complications encountered in children as well. In the most recent retrospective review by Tolley et al, they had revealed that patients who had underwent transgluteal ESWL for distal ureteric stones had an improved stone-free rate of 78% in the transgluteal group versus 40% in the prone group after one session of shockwave lithotripsy and a stone-free rate of 92% versus 63% respectively after two sessions of shockwave lithotripsy. This has been speculated to be due to the presence of bowel gas attenuating the shockwaves as well as a long skin-to-stone distance in the prone position.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Urinary Tract Stones Urinary Stones Urinary Calculi

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Prone ESWL

ESWL for distal ureteric stone is performed in the traditional prone position

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Prone ESWL

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

ESWL to the distal ureteric stone is performed in the traditional prone position. The shockwave generator is placed on the patient's abdomen

Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy (ESWL)

Intervention Type DEVICE

The ESWL machine we use is the Dornier S2 lithotriptor. ESWL is performed without any sedation or anesthesia under fluoroscopy. Painkillers are given upon request.

Supine ESWL

ESWL for distal ureteric stone is performed in the supine position, with the shockwave generator head placed at a 30 degree angle to the vertical at the patient's gluteal muscles. Thus, the shockwaves will travel via the greater and lesser sciatic foramina to reach the stone

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Supine ESWL

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

ESWL to distal ureteric stone is performed in the supine position with the shockwave generator placed in the patient's buttock area. The aim is to direct the shockwaves through the greater and lesser sciatic foramina to reach the distal ureter.

Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy (ESWL)

Intervention Type DEVICE

The ESWL machine we use is the Dornier S2 lithotriptor. ESWL is performed without any sedation or anesthesia under fluoroscopy. Painkillers are given upon request.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Supine ESWL

ESWL to distal ureteric stone is performed in the supine position with the shockwave generator placed in the patient's buttock area. The aim is to direct the shockwaves through the greater and lesser sciatic foramina to reach the distal ureter.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Prone ESWL

ESWL to the distal ureteric stone is performed in the traditional prone position. The shockwave generator is placed on the patient's abdomen

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy (ESWL)

The ESWL machine we use is the Dornier S2 lithotriptor. ESWL is performed without any sedation or anesthesia under fluoroscopy. Painkillers are given upon request.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Transgluteal

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients, over 18 years of age, with distal ureteric stones with stone size of ≥3mm on kidney-ureter-bladder (KUB) X-ray who opted for ESWL treatment

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who are unable to provide consent
* radiolucent stones
* active urinary tract infections
* pregnancy
* uncontrolled hypertension
* uncontrolled bleeding tendencies
* severe skeletal malformations
* arterial aneurysms within the vicinity of the stone (such as iliac artery aneurysms)
* unable to assume the appropriate position (prone or supine) for ESWL
* solitary kidneys
* transplanted kidneys
* presence of ureteric stents
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Brian Ho

Resident Specialist (Urology)

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Brian Ho, MBBS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Queen Mary Hospital

Hong Kong, , China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Brian Ho, MBBS

Role: CONTACT

(852)2255-3023

Sau Loi Ng, BN, DN

Role: CONTACT

(852)2255-3625

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Brian Ho, MBBS, FCSHK

Role: primary

(852)2255-3023

Sau Loi Ng, BN, DN

Role: backup

(852)2255-3625

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Jenkins AD, Gillenwater JY. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the prone position: treatment of stones in the distal ureter or anomalous kidney. J Urol. 1988 May;139(5):911-5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)42713-3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3361661 (View on PubMed)

Zehntner CH, Marth D, Zingg EJ. ESWL treatment with ventral shock-wave application: therapy of iliac and distal ureteral calculi. Urology. 1991 Jul;38(1):51-3. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(91)80013-w.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 1866859 (View on PubMed)

Lu J, Sun X, He L. Sciaticum majus foramen and sciaticum minus foramen as the path of SWL in the supine position to treat distal ureteral stone. Urol Res. 2010 Dec;38(6):417-20. doi: 10.1007/s00240-010-0285-2. Epub 2010 Jul 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20625895 (View on PubMed)

Sun X, He L, Lu J, Cong X, Shen L, Wang Y, Zhu H. Greater and lesser ischiadic foramina as path of shock wave lithotripsy for distal ureteral stone in children. J Urol. 2010 Aug;184(2):665-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.060. Epub 2010 Jun 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20639031 (View on PubMed)

Phipps S, Stephenson C, Tolley D. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy to distal ureteric stones: the transgluteal approach significantly increases stone-free rates. BJU Int. 2013 Jul;112(2):E129-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11738.x. Epub 2013 Jan 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23360696 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

QueenMaryH

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Laser Lithotripsy for Ureteral Stones
NCT06465784 COMPLETED PHASE4