Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
150 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-11-30
2015-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
If fulfilling the In- and exclusion criteria's, patient will be randomly assigned to one of two groups
1. C-MAC Videolaryngoscope in appropriate size
2. conventional endotracheal intubation using Macintosh Blade in appropriate size
Randomization (1:1) will be based on computer-generated codes maintained in sequentially numbered opaque envelopes that will be opened immediately before randomization.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
ETI During Intubation
NCT02295618
Laryngoscope Versus CMAC for Endotracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing Emergent Airway Management
NCT01710891
Intubation During Resuscitation
NCT02277951
Endotracheal Intubation in Prehospital Scenario
NCT02681835
Pediatric Endotracheal Intubation
NCT02291653
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
conventional endotracheal intubation
Patients assigned to this group will be intubated using conventional Macintosh blade in adequate size.
Macintosh blade
conventional endotracheal intubation
C-MAC
Patients assigned to this group will be intubated using C-MAC videolaryngoscope in adequate size.
C-MAC videolaryngoscope
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Macintosh blade
conventional endotracheal intubation
C-MAC videolaryngoscope
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Male and Female subjects 18 years to 99 years of age
* Written confirmation by a physician not involved in this study
* Written informed consent by the participant (obtained afterwards)
* Patient not showing remarkable rejection in participation in this study
Exclusion Criteria
* Immobilized cervical spine
* Indication for fiberoptic guided intubation (known difficult airway)
* Ongoing Cardio-Pulmonary-Resuscitation (CPR)
* Involvement in any other clinical trial during the course of this trial, within a period of 30 days prior to its beginning or 30 days after its completion
* Severe or immediately life-treating injury requiring immediate medical treatment
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Zurich
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospital Zuerich, Dept of Anesthesiology
Zurich, Canton of Zurich, Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sulser S, Ubmann D, Brueesch M, Goliasch G, Seifert B, Spahn DR, Ruetzler K. The C-MAC videolaryngoscope compared with conventional laryngoscopy for rapid sequence intubation at the emergency department: study protocol. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2015 Apr 24;23:38. doi: 10.1186/s13049-015-0119-x.
Sulser S, Ubmann D, Schlaepfer M, Brueesch M, Goliasch G, Seifert B, Spahn DR, Ruetzler K. C-MAC videolaryngoscope compared with direct laryngoscopy for rapid sequence intubation in an emergency department: A randomised clinical trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016 Dec;33(12):943-948. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000525.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
KEK Zurich 2014-0356
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.