Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
75 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-09-30
2019-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The objective of this study is to accurately assess and compare migration, kinematics, prosthesis placement and patient reported outcomes of two TKR prostheses: the fixed bearing, cemented NexGen LPS, a proven design with an excellent clinical track record, and the fixed bearing, cemented Persona PS, a new design without clinical data (both designs by Zimmer, Warsaw, Indiana, USA). The primary objective is to assess and compare migration of the two TKR prostheses (Femoral and Tibial component). The secondary objective is to assess and compare clinical data, kinematics, prosthesis placement and patient reported outcome measures.
This study is designed as a single-blind randomized trial between the Persona PS total knee prosthesis and the well-established NexGen total knee prosthesis.
Different sample sizes are used for the different parts of this study:
* 30 Patients with NexGen LPS prosthesis and 30 patients with Persona PS prosthesis for RSA
* 15 Patients with NexGen LPS prosthesis and 15 patients with Persona PS prosthesis for Fluo
The study population will consist of patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee scheduled for TKR surgery at the Department of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center. Annually 40 TKA procedures are performed in our department, of which about 70% is Osteo Arthritis (OA) and 30% Reumatoid Arthritis (RA). We anticipate that inclusion can be accomplished within a 2 year period.
Main study parameters/endpoints are:
* Migration, measured by means of RSA.
* Prosthesis placement and bone resection measured by means of CT and caliper measurements of the resected bone parts.
* In vivo kinematics by means of fluoroscopy.
* Patient Reported Outcome Measures by means of questionaires.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Persona MC Retained PCL vs. Persona Posterior-stabilized vs. NexGen PS
NCT04164147
A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Control Study on Persona Total Knee System vs NexGen
NCT03073941
Persona Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes Study
NCT02255383
NexGen Gender Fixed Bearing Knee Versus NexGen Legacy Knee Posterior Stabilized (LPS) - Flex Fixed Bearing Knee: A Study Comparing Two Different Knee Prostheses
NCT00901329
Comparison of Three Knee Replacements
NCT03339557
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Persona PS
Total Knee Replacement with Persona PS Knee Prosthesis by Zimmer
Persona PS Knee Prosthesis by Zimmer
Total Knee Replacement with Persona PS Knee Prosthesis by Zimmer
NexGen PS
Total Knee Replacement with NexGen PS Knee Prosthesis by Zimmer
NexGen PS Knee Prosthesis by Zimmer
Total Knee Replacement with NexGen PS Knee Prosthesis by Zimmer
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Persona PS Knee Prosthesis by Zimmer
Total Knee Replacement with Persona PS Knee Prosthesis by Zimmer
NexGen PS Knee Prosthesis by Zimmer
Total Knee Replacement with NexGen PS Knee Prosthesis by Zimmer
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient has been classified ASA 1 or 2 (for the kinematic analysis) (Meyer Saklad, 1941). As for the RSA study all consecutive patients ("usual care") are included to prevent selection bias in the migration analysis. Stratification is performed per diagnosis group (OA/RA).
Exclusion Criteria
* Insufficient Dutch or English language skills
* Patients indicated for revision arthroplasty
* Patient is (or might be) pregnant
21 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Zimmer Biomet
INDUSTRY
Leiden University Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
R.G.H.H. Nelissen
Prof. PhD MD Head of the Department of Orthopaedics
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Rob GHH Nelissen, Prof. PhD, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Dep. Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center
Edward R Valstar, Prof. PhD. MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Dep. Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Leiden University Medical Center
Leiden, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
P13.277
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.