An Open Label Study of LMI070 (Branaplam) in Type 1 Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
NCT ID: NCT02268552
Last Updated: 2025-04-09
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1/PHASE2
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-04-02
2022-12-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Nusinersen (ISIS 396443) in Infants With Spinal Muscular Atrophy
NCT02193074
Safety and Efficacy of NMD670 in Ambulatory Adult Patients With Type 3 Spinal Muscular Atrophy
NCT05794139
A Study of CK-2127107 in Patients With Spinal Muscular Atrophy
NCT02644668
Personalized Antisense Oligonucleotide for A Single Participant (nL62541) With ATN1 Gene Mutation
NCT07221760
Efficacy and Safety of Intrathecal OAV101 (AVXS-101) in Pediatric Patients With Type 2 Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
NCT05089656
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Parts 1,2 and 3 were intended to be non-confirmatory.
In Part 1 of the study, patients were dosed once weekly with branaplam. The branaplam dose was escalated in subsequent cohorts until MTD was determined or when sufficient PK results confirmed that the MTD could not be reached due to a potential pharmacokinetic plateau at higher doses. A decision to dose escalate the next cohort was made after safety data was collected for 14 days following the first dose (14-day DLT window). PK was used to confirm that there was no accumulation of the compound. After 13 weeks treatment, participants in part 1 could enter an extension treatment phase until they discontinued from the study or were transferred into part 3.
Part 2 of the study enrolled new patients into one 2 dose cohorts with once weekly dosing for 52 weeks. The branaplam dose was escalated in subsequent cohorts after 6 patients were enrolled and at least 3 patients from the previous cohort completed 13 weeks of treatment. After 52 weeks, patients may have continued treatment in part 3 if it was in the best interest of the patient.
Part 3, participants from part 1 and 2 who have completed at least 52 weeks of banaplam treatment were elegible to continue receiving treatment as long as in the best interest of the patient. In all cases continuation of the treatment was done at a dose selected as optimum, considering existing safety as well as efficacy data.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
branaplam
branaplam Treatment
branaplam
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
branaplam
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Type 1 SMA, diagnosed clinically, with symptom onset \<6 months of age and genetic confirmation of mutations in both alleles of the SMN1 gene, and with SMN2 copy number of 2.
* Best supportive care in place and stable for at least 14 days before screening.
* Must be able to demonstrate antigravity strength in both biceps. At birth gestational age \>32 weeks and body weight at birth \>2 kg.
* Must live within 2 hours drive of study center. Clearance should be obtained from the site investigator and sponsor if the patient resides more than 2 hours ground travel from the study center
Specific for Part 1
* Age at screening between 1 and 7 months
* Must have or agree to have placement of feeding tube for enteral access via nasogastric (NG), nasojejunal (NJ), percutaneous gastrostomy (PEG), or percutaneous jejunostomy (PEJ) tube for administration of branaplam (for patients in whom branaplam cannot be administered orally ; NG tube may be removed between doses).
Specific for Part 2
* Age at screening between 30 and 180 days of age
* Must have or agree to have placement of feeding tube for enteral access via nasogastric (NG), nasojejunal (NJ), percutaneous gastrostomy (PEG), or percutaneous jejunostomy (PEJ) tube for administration of branaplam (for the first administration only and for patients in whom branaplam cannot be administered orally; NG tube may be removed between doses).
* Minimum CHOP INTEND score of 15 at baseline
* Must be able to feed orally for all nutritional needs and be greater than the 2nd percentile for weight on the standard growth curves for the country of origin
Exclusion Criteria
* Neurologic, or neuromuscular conditions other than SMA.
* Anemia, leukopenia, neutropenia or thrombocytopenia
* Hepatic dysfunction
* Age adjusted renal dysfunction
* Presence of an untreated or inadequately treated active infection requiring systemic antiviral or antimicrobial therapy at any time during the screening period.
* Presence of an untreated or inadequately treated active infection requiring systemic antiviral or antimicrobial therapy at any time during the screening period.
* Excluding SMA, any medically unstable condition including cardiomyopathy, hepatic dysfunction, kidney disorder, endocrine disorder, GI disorders, prematurity of \<32 weeks gestation, metabolic disorders, severe respiratory compromise and significant brain abnormalities or injuries including hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy.
* Current diagnosis of cardiac and/or vascular abnormalities or ECG abnormalities
* Acute or ongoing medical condition that, according to the Site Investigator and discussed with sponsor, would interfere with the conduct and assessments of the study. Examples are medical disability other than SMA that would interfere with the assessment of safety or would compromise the ability of the subject to undergo study procedures including be assessed by CHOP INTEND motor scale, changes in hematologic parameters or gastrointestinal dysfunction that would compromise the ability of adequate assessment of safety
Specific for Part 1
* Use of other investigational drugs within 14 days.
* Intractable seizure disorder (other than inactive febrile seizures).
* Persistent (in the opinion of the Investigator) hypoxemia (O2 saturation awake \<92% or O2 saturation asleep \<91%, without ventilation support) or requiring oral suctioning \>2 per day, or presence of a tracheostomy.
Specific for Part 2
* Use of nusinersen or gene transfer at any time or other investigational drugs within 14 days.
* Intractable epilepsy
* Persistent (in the opinion of the Investigator) hypoxemia (O2 saturation awake \<92% or O2 saturation asleep \<91%, without ventilation support), or presence of a tracheostomy.
28 Days
182 Days
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Novartis Investigative Site
Ghent, , Belgium
Novartis Investigative Site
Leuven, , Belgium
Novartis Investigative Site
Sofia, , Bulgaria
Novartis Investigative Site
Copenhagen, , Denmark
Novartis Investigative Site
Essen, , Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Milan, MI, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Roma, RM, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Warsaw, , Poland
Novartis Investigative Site
Wroclaw, , Poland
Novartis Investigative Site
Moscow, , Russia
Novartis Investigative Site
Moscow, , Russia
Novartis Investigative Site
Saint Petersburg, , Russia
Novartis Investigative Site
Volgograd, , Russia
Novartis Investigative Site
Yekaterinburg, , Russia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Keller CG, Shin Y, Monteys AM, Renaud N, Beibel M, Teider N, Peters T, Faller T, St-Cyr S, Knehr J, Roma G, Reyes A, Hild M, Lukashev D, Theil D, Dales N, Cha JH, Borowsky B, Dolmetsch R, Davidson BL, Sivasankaran R. An orally available, brain penetrant, small molecule lowers huntingtin levels by enhancing pseudoexon inclusion. Nat Commun. 2022 Mar 3;13(1):1150. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28653-6.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CLMI070X2201
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.