To Compare Efficacy and Safety Between CT-P10 and Rituxan in Patients With Low Tumour Burden Follicular Lymphoma

NCT ID: NCT02260804

Last Updated: 2021-04-08

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

258 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-11-09

Study Completion Date

2019-09-04

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To demonstrate that CT-P10 is similar to Rituxan in terms of efficacy as determined by overall response rate at 7 months

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Follicular Lymphoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

CT-P10

CT-P10, intervention 375mg/m2, intravenous, 4 cycles in induction period and additional 12 cycles in maintenance period

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CT-P10

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

375mg/m2, IV on day1 of 4 cycles in induction period, and 12 cycles in maintenance period.

Rituxan

Rituxan, 375mg/m2 intravenous, 4 cycles in induction period, Rituxan for the first 6 cycles and CT-P10 for the last 6 cycles in maintenance period.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Rituxan

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

375mg/m2, IV on day1 of 4 cycles in induction period, Rituxan for the first 6 cycles and CT-P10 for the last 6 cycles in maintenance period.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

CT-P10

375mg/m2, IV on day1 of 4 cycles in induction period, and 12 cycles in maintenance period.

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Rituxan

375mg/m2, IV on day1 of 4 cycles in induction period, Rituxan for the first 6 cycles and CT-P10 for the last 6 cycles in maintenance period.

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Confirmed diagnosis of low tumour burden, CD20+ follicular lymphoma
* Ann Arbor Stage II, III or IV

Exclusion Criteria

* Has receive rituximab
* Allergies or hypersensitivity to murine, chimeric, human or humanised proteins
* Previous treatment for NHL
* Any malignancy
* Current or recent treatment with any other investigational medicinal product or device
* pregnant or lactating
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Celltrion

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

SungHyun Kim

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Celltrion

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Severance Hospital

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kwak LW, Sancho JM, Cho SG, Nakazawa H, Suzumiya J, Tumyan G, Kim JS, Menne T, Mariz J, Ilyin N, Jurczak W, Lopez Martinez A, Samoilova O, Zhavrid E, Yanez Ruiz E, Trneny M, Popplewell L, Ogura M, Kim WS, Lee SJ, Kim SH, Ahn KY, Buske C. Efficacy and Safety of CT-P10 Versus Rituximab in Untreated Low-Tumor-Burden Follicular Lymphoma: Final Results of a Randomized Phase III Study. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2022 Feb;22(2):89-97. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2021.08.005. Epub 2021 Aug 28.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34686445 (View on PubMed)

Ogura M, Sancho JM, Cho SG, Nakazawa H, Suzumiya J, Tumyan G, Kim JS, Lennard A, Mariz J, Ilyin N, Jurczak W, Lopez Martinez A, Samoilova O, Zhavrid E, Yanez Ruiz E, Trneny M, Popplewell L, Coiffier B, Buske C, Kim WS, Lee SJ, Lee SY, Bae YJ, Kwak LW. Efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and safety of the biosimilar CT-P10 in comparison with rituximab in patients with previously untreated low-tumour-burden follicular lymphoma: a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2018 Nov;5(11):e543-e553. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(18)30157-1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30389036 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CT-P10 3.4

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.