Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
63 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-05-31
2012-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Protein Intake on Preterm Infant Body Composition
NCT02353013
Protein Dose-repsonse Effect on GLP-1, PYY and Appetite in Male Subjects
NCT01561235
The Effect of Protein-enriched Diet on Body Composition and Appetite
NCT01634048
Effectiveness of Quaker Complete Nutrition Supplements for Malnourished Adults
NCT00523900
The Beneficial Effects of a Protein-rich Breakfast on Appetite Control & Cognition in Overweight and Obese Adolescents
NCT01192100
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
We recruited 63 adult survivors of SAM, aged 17 to 46 years, who in childhood had been treated at the Tropical Metabolism Research Unit (TMRU) Metabolic Ward. Data on birth weight, age, weight and length at admission were abstracted from TMRU records. Subjects provided written informed consent. The study was approved by the Faculty of Medical Sciences Ethics Committee, University of the West Indies.
Measurements were conducted in two phases. All subjects were seen in single-sex pairs and stayed in a dedicated metabolic suite for 9 consecutive days. During phase 1 (days 1 to 3- choice experiment) they ate freely at each mealtime from menus comprising a combination of foods containing different percentages of energy as protein (PEP), set at 10%, 15% or 25% (26). During phase 2 (days 4 to 8), pairs were randomized to one of three groups each of which received only foods that contained 10%, 15% or 25% PEP. The participants were blinded to the treatment. Participants were taken for a 1-hour supervised walk each day at 4 pm.
Thirty-one local recipes of 10 sweet and 21 savoury foods were selected. Each was modified into three recipes containing 10, 15 or 25% energy as protein through the addition of food ingredients, a protein mix and/or maltodextrin (Ross Nutrition). Carbohydrate was adjusted to be 60, 55 or 45% energy and dietary fat was kept constant at 30%. The PEP versions of each food/recipe were taste tested for the ability to determine the protein concentration of any dish due to appearance, smell or texture as well as for pleasantness. If taste testers were able to detect any difference, the recipes were adjusted and retested until no difference was detected. Up to 11 foods were provided on each day during the 8-day period, giving participants both variety and choice at all times as indicated in table 1. During the first three days (phase 1), three food items other than fruit and vegetable salads and tea were offered at breakfast, lunch and dinner to all the participants. These three food items at each of these meal times included foods containing 10%, 15% or 25% protein energy. From days 4 to 8 (phase 2), these same daily food types were repeated every three days but the foods contained 10 PEP in one group, in another group they all contained 15 PEP, and in the third group they all contained 25 PEP protein.
Breakfast was provided at 8 am, lunch at 12:30 pm and dinner at 6 pm. During both phases snack items were made freely available at all times. The amount eaten was determined by weighing each food item before consumption and any not eaten to the nearest gram. The foods were served in weighed quantities on tared containers. Plates were of a single design and neutral (white) color. The same size, style and color plates were used for the 10, 15 and 25 PEP version of each food. Participants were offered optional foods including 100g fruit salad, and decaffeinated tea sweetened with a measured amount of brown sugar with breakfast, and 100g vegetable salad with lunch and dinner. A three-day food diary completed prior to the 8 day ad libitum test period and foods consumed during the test period were analysed for total energy, protein, carbohydrate and fat content.
The weight of the subjects without shoes and in light clothing was measured daily to the nearest 0.1 kg; height was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm. Fat and fat-free mass were obtained from DEXA measurements. Weight gain was calculated from day 1 to 4 in phase 1 and from day 4 to 8 in phase 2.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
BASIC_SCIENCE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
10 % Protein
10% Dietary protein energy
Dietary protein
Persons were fed
Participants were randomized to one of three arms, each of which received 10%, 15% or 25% of total energy derived from protein
15% Protein
15% Dietary protein energy
Dietary protein
Persons were fed
Participants were randomized to one of three arms, each of which received 10%, 15% or 25% of total energy derived from protein
25% Protein
25% Dietary protein energy
Dietary protein
Persons were fed
Participants were randomized to one of three arms, each of which received 10%, 15% or 25% of total energy derived from protein
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dietary protein
Persons were fed
Participants were randomized to one of three arms, each of which received 10%, 15% or 25% of total energy derived from protein
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
17 Years
46 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Auckland, New Zealand
OTHER
The University of The West Indies
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Claudia Campbell
Dr. Claudia Patricia Campbell
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Terrence G Forrester, MBBS, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University of the West Indies, Mona
David Raubenheimer, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Aukland
Claudia P Campbell, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of the West Indies, Mona
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gosby AK, Soares-Wynter S, Campbell C, Badaloo A, Antonelli M, Hall RM, Martinez-Cordero C, Jebb SA, Brand-Miller J, Caterson ID, Conigrave AD, Forrester TG, Raubenheimer D, Simpson SJ. Design and testing of foods differing in protein to energy ratios. Appetite. 2010 Oct;55(2):367-70. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2010.06.009. Epub 2010 Jun 19.
Forrester TE, Badaloo AV, Boyne MS, Osmond C, Thompson D, Green C, Taylor-Bryan C, Barnett A, Soares-Wynter S, Hanson MA, Beedle AS, Gluckman PD. Prenatal factors contribute to the emergence of kwashiorkor or marasmus in severe undernutrition: evidence for the predictive adaptation model. PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35907. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035907. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ECP 71, 2008/2009
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.