Evaluation of the Effect of Pure Canterbury Stage 1 Infant Formula Milk Powder on the Growth of Infant 0-6 Months of Age
NCT ID: NCT02239588
Last Updated: 2014-09-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-04-30
2014-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effect of Pure Canterbury Stage 1 (0-6 months) milk powder on:
1. Bone health;
2. Infants growth;
3. Intestinal health;
4. Gastrointestinal tolerance to the test product;
g) Incidence of Eczema
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effects of Breast Milk Simulated Infant Formula
NCT05295030
Effect of an Infant Formula on Infant Growth, Health and Immune Functions
NCT00970398
Adjustable Fortification of Human Milk Fed to Chinese Preterm Infants
NCT01731613
To Investigate Effects of a New Infant Formula in Healthy Term Chinese Infants
NCT03520764
Human Milk Fortifier - Growth Evaluation
NCT01771588
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1.2 On-site audits: Domestic and foreign regulatory authorities, the IEC/IRB, and an auditor authorized by the sponsor may request access to all source documents, case report forms, and other study documentation for on-site audit or inspection. Direct access to these documents was guaranteed by the investigator, who must provide support at all times for these activities. Medical records and other study documents may be copied during audit or inspection provided that subject names are obliterated on the copies to ensure confidentiality.
1.3 Documentation: A case report form was provided for each subject. All protocol-required information collected during the study was entered by the investigator, or designated representative, in the case report form. Details of case report form completion and correction were explained to the investigator.
The investigator, or designated representative, should complete the case report form pages as soon as possible after information is collected, preferably on the same day that a study patient is seen for an examination, treatment, or any other study procedure. Any outstanding entries must be completed immediately after the final examination. An explanation should be given for all missing data.
A source data location list was prepared prior to study initiation. This list was filed in both the trial master file and the investigator study file and updated as necessary.
The completed case report forms were reviewed and signed by the investigator named in the clinical study protocol or by a designated sub investigator.
The sponsor would retain the original of all completed case report forms. The principal investigator kept the copies of all completed case report forms for 25 years after the trial based on Good Clinical Practice (GCP) requirements.
• Quality assurance of study products: All products used in this study were manufactured and provided by Bright Dairy \& Food Co., Ltd. The quality test of study products was conducted by Shanghai dairy products quality supervision and inspection station. The study products were stored at the study site and assigned to the subjects by the investigator. The amount of products received and assigned were filed on product distribution list by the investigator. The study products were not allowed to be given to anyone who didn't participated in the study. No sales of unassigned products was allowed. After the completion of the study, the unassigned products need to be returned to Bright Dairy \& Food Co., Ltd.
The products were labeled with study code. A master participation list was completed which identifies each patient full name and unique identification number. The identity of the specific product was blind to patients, support staff and investigators. The unmasking occurred to the investigators and statistical analyses team only after completion of statistical analyses.
• Data management: Study data were recorded on Case Report Forms (CRFs) and then entered into saved in the form of Excel files. Data was double entered and cross-validated.
• Management of subject withdrawal: A number of 120 subjects were enrolled in the study.
Subjects may be withdrawn from the study for the following reasons:
* At their own request or at the request of their legally authorized representative,
* If, in the investigator's opinion, continuation in the study would be detrimental to the patient's well-being,
* If they are lost to follow-up. In all cases, the reason for and date of withdrawal must be recorded in the Exit Form and in the subject's medical records and the sponsor's representative must be notified within 5 days. The subject must be followed up to establish whether the reason was an adverse event, and, if so, this must be reported in accordance with the procedure of an adverse event (described bellow). The investigator must make every effort to contact subject lost to follow-up. Attempts to contact such subject must be documented in the subject's records (e.g., dates and times of attempted telephone contact).
Investigator must be notified of all serious or unexpected adverse events within 48 hours. Notification does not depend on whether there is a connection to the study formula or not. All adverse events must be documented on the appropriate pages of the case report forms.
• Statistical analysis plan: Analysis was performed for the intent-to-treat population. Chi-square test was used comparison among study groups for categorical data. For continuous outcomes, one-way ANOVA was used for between-group comparison, followed by multiple comparison with Bonferroni adjustment. Paired t-test was used for pre-post comparison within each study group. Non-parametric methods were used for non-normal data, data with unequal variances. The analysis was completed using the statistical package SPSS17.0.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Pure Canterbury milk powder
Oral consumption of infant formula (0-6 months) milk powder
Oral consumption
Daily oral consumption for 12 weeks:
Placebo;
Pure Canterbury;
Other infant formula milk powder:
1. Yashili Ambery Infant Formula Milk Powder (Stage 1 0-6 months)
2. Yashili Newwit Infant Formula Milk Powder (Stage 1 0-6 months)
3. Yashili α-golden stage Infant Formula Milk Powder (Stage 1 0-6 months)
4. Abbott Similac Infant Formula Milk Powder (Stage 1 0-6 months)
5. Wyeth S-26 SMA Gold Infant Formula Milk Powder (Stage 1 0-6 months)
6. Beingmate Love plus Infant Formula Milk Powder (Stage 1 0-6 months)
Other infant formula milk powder
Oral consumption of milk powder (other than the experimental product) selected by subjects' parents. The products including:
1. Yashili Ambery Infant Formula Milk Powder (Stage 1: 0-6 months)
2. Yashili Newwit Infant Formula Milk Powder (Stage 1 0-6 months)
3. Yashili α-golden stage Infant Formula Milk Powder (Stage 1 0-6 months)
4. Abbott Similac Infant Formula Milk Powder (Stage 1 0-6 months)
5. Wyeth S-26 SMA Gold Infant Formula Milk Powder (Stage 1 0-6 months)
6. Beingmate Love plus Infant Formula Milk Powder (Stage 1 0-6 months)
Oral consumption
Daily oral consumption for 12 weeks:
Placebo;
Pure Canterbury;
Other infant formula milk powder:
1. Yashili Ambery Infant Formula Milk Powder (Stage 1 0-6 months)
2. Yashili Newwit Infant Formula Milk Powder (Stage 1 0-6 months)
3. Yashili α-golden stage Infant Formula Milk Powder (Stage 1 0-6 months)
4. Abbott Similac Infant Formula Milk Powder (Stage 1 0-6 months)
5. Wyeth S-26 SMA Gold Infant Formula Milk Powder (Stage 1 0-6 months)
6. Beingmate Love plus Infant Formula Milk Powder (Stage 1 0-6 months)
Breast milk
Oral consumption of breast milk
Oral consumption
Daily oral consumption for 12 weeks:
Placebo;
Pure Canterbury;
Other infant formula milk powder:
1. Yashili Ambery Infant Formula Milk Powder (Stage 1 0-6 months)
2. Yashili Newwit Infant Formula Milk Powder (Stage 1 0-6 months)
3. Yashili α-golden stage Infant Formula Milk Powder (Stage 1 0-6 months)
4. Abbott Similac Infant Formula Milk Powder (Stage 1 0-6 months)
5. Wyeth S-26 SMA Gold Infant Formula Milk Powder (Stage 1 0-6 months)
6. Beingmate Love plus Infant Formula Milk Powder (Stage 1 0-6 months)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Oral consumption
Daily oral consumption for 12 weeks:
Placebo;
Pure Canterbury;
Other infant formula milk powder:
1. Yashili Ambery Infant Formula Milk Powder (Stage 1 0-6 months)
2. Yashili Newwit Infant Formula Milk Powder (Stage 1 0-6 months)
3. Yashili α-golden stage Infant Formula Milk Powder (Stage 1 0-6 months)
4. Abbott Similac Infant Formula Milk Powder (Stage 1 0-6 months)
5. Wyeth S-26 SMA Gold Infant Formula Milk Powder (Stage 1 0-6 months)
6. Beingmate Love plus Infant Formula Milk Powder (Stage 1 0-6 months)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Fed by breast milk before enrollment;
* Concent form signed by parents
Exclusion Criteria
* During pregnancy, the mothers had pregnancy complications or other disease that may affect the study results;
* Having serious diseases that may affect study interventions, such as neonatal sepsis, pneumonia (associated with respiratory failure), heart failure and other diseases;
* Having neonatal diarrhea or acute respiratory infections within 48 hours before enrollment;
* Having potential metabolic diseases, chronic diseases, congenital malformations, central nervous system disorders, neuromuscular disorders or diseases affecting bone metabolism that may affect growth or the study results;
* Having taken any food containing prebiotics or probiotics within 15 days of enrollment;
* Having gluten allergy (celiac disease);
* Body weight-to-height Z-value \<-3 according to the standard of WHO;
* Receiving hormone therapy and intravenous nutrition;
* Lactose intolerance;
* Have participated in other clinical studies within 3 months prior to the date of screening;
* Unable to comply the study schedule
7 Days
90 Days
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Bright Dairy & Food Co., Ltd
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Xiaoyang Sheng, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
XinHua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai JiaoTong University
Shanghai, , China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
13-SC-7-BRD-002
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.