Eagle AF (Atrial Fibrillation) - Endoscopically Guided Laser Ablation of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

NCT ID: NCT02234102

Last Updated: 2015-08-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

160 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-08-31

Study Completion Date

2017-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study aims to compare the results of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with a single technology approach in patients suffering from paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) with patients who have persistent AF of less than 3 months. Many studies have shown that electrical reconnection of the pulmonary veins following the index procedure can occur in up to 40% of targeted veins leading to a recurrence of PAF. Endoscopically guided laser ablation utilising the HeartLight system (CardioFocus Inc., USA) has been shown to be safe and effective and has also shown promising rates of durable isolation compared to point by point radio frequency techniques. However, the impact of employing this technique for patients with persistent AF has not yet been reported. The study hypothesis is that there will be no statistically significant difference between the results of PVI in the two groups of patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (PAF)

Endoscopically guided laser ablation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Endoscopically guided laser ablation HeartLight system

Intervention Type DEVICE

Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Endoscopically guided laser ablation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Endoscopically guided laser ablation HeartLight system

Intervention Type DEVICE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Endoscopically guided laser ablation HeartLight system

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

HeartLight system

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* failure of at least one specific class I or III antiarrhythmic drug (AAD)
* left atrial size \< 50 mm
* left ventricular ejection fraction \> 45%
* others
* specific for PAF: diagnosed with self-terminating episodes for no longer than 7 days
* specific for persistent AF: diagnosed with episodes of \> 7 days and \< 90 days

Exclusion Criteria

* AF secondary to a reversible cause of non-cardiac origin
* uncontrollable hypertension
* left atrial thrombus
* others
* specific for PAF: more than 1 electrical cardioversion in the year prior to enrollment
* specific for persistent AF more than 4 electrical cardioversions in the year prior to enrollment
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Prof. Dr. med. Bernd Lemke

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Prof. Dr. med. Bernd Lemke

Klinikdirektor der Klinik für Innere Medizin III

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bernd Lemke, Prof. Dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Klinikum Lüdenscheid Klinik f. Innere Medizin III

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

St.Vinzenz-Hospital GmbH

Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Märkische Kliniken GmbH, Klinik für Innere Medizin III

Lüdenscheid, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Vivantes Netzwerk für Gesundheit GmbH

Berlin, State of Berlin, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Bernd Lemke, Prof. Dr.

Role: CONTACT

+49 2351 4665551

Markus Zarse, PD Dr.

Role: CONTACT

+49 2351 4666299

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Dinh Quang Nguyen, Dr.

Role: primary

+49 22177124059

Markus Zarse, PD Dr.

Role: primary

+49 2351 4666299

Niels Christian Ewertsen, Dr.

Role: primary

+49 30130225167

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AF 34/2014 version 02

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.