MRI / Ultrasound Fusion With Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Guidance
NCT ID: NCT02233725
Last Updated: 2014-09-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE1
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-07-31
2015-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Perfusion to Detect Disease in Prostate Carcinoma
NCT00230386
Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer With 18F-DCFPyL PET/MR
NCT03149861
US-CT Fusion for Post Implant Dosimetry
NCT03692104
Choline PET/CT and MRI for Targeted Prostate Biopsy
NCT01751737
Real Time MRI Fused to Cone Beam CT Guided Biopsies of the Prostate.
NCT04180592
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
While MRI / Ultrasound Fusion is being shown to increase prostate cancer identification and targeting for biopsy, it is a very limited modality due to the costs associated. Many sites will also not have access to an MRI unit, and the fusion system is prohibitively expensive, and requires specialized training to configure the system and modulate the images in real-time. However, ultrasound is an in expensive modality that is readily available. If the materials and methods in the utilization of contrast-enhanced ultrasounds can be correlated to MRI / Ultrasound fusion, better protocols can be developed for contrast-enhanced ultrasound. This more cost-effective method of identifying and targeting prostate cancer could then be exported to smaller communities who would otherwise still be carrying out the sextant biopsy model.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Definity Perflutren Suspension
Injection of Definity Perflutren Injectable Suspension- which travels in the bloodstream throughout the body. These microbubbles are identifiable on ultrasound imaging, and studies of the liver and kidney have identified it as a useful adjunct to identifying vascular lesions. Areas of regular blood flow will not have as large a concentration of the microbubble agent as will areas that have increased blood flow and neovascularisation. It has been well documented that cancerous solid lesions undergo neovascularisation and have increased blood flow to the area.
Definity Perflutren Injectable Suspension
a single dose of 10 μL/kg of the activated product by intravenous bolus injection over 30-60 seconds, followed by a 10 mL saline flush. If necessary, a second 10 μL/kg dose may be administered 5 minutes after the first injection to prolong contrast enhancement
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Definity Perflutren Injectable Suspension
a single dose of 10 μL/kg of the activated product by intravenous bolus injection over 30-60 seconds, followed by a 10 mL saline flush. If necessary, a second 10 μL/kg dose may be administered 5 minutes after the first injection to prolong contrast enhancement
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who have had previous reaction to any contrast agent at any point in the past
* Patients who have had previous septic infection from prostate biopsies at any point in the past
* Patients who have a right-to-left, bi-directional, or transient right-to-left cardiac shunts.
* Patients undergoing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary calculi.
* Patients with pre-existing cardiopulmonary compromise including, but not limited to, acute myocardial infarction, acute coronary artery syndromes, worsening or unstable congestive heart failure, serious ventricular arrhythmias or respiratory failure, including patients receiving mechanical ventilation
25 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of British Columbia
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Christopher Eddy, BSc
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
VCH
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Vancouver Coastal Health (VCHRI/VCHA)
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Maxeiner A, Fischer T, Stephan C, Cash H, Slowinski T, Kilic E, Durmus T. [Real-time MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy improves detection rates of prostate cancer in pre-biopsied patients]. Aktuelle Urol. 2014 May;45(3):197-203. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1375682. Epub 2014 Jun 5. German.
Rifkin MD, Dahnert W, Kurtz AB. State of the art: endorectal sonography of the prostate gland. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990 Apr;154(4):691-700. doi: 10.2214/ajr.154.4.1690499. No abstract available.
Oyen R, Van Popel H, Van de Voorde W, Knapen P, Ameye F, Baert AL, Baert LV. [The significance of focal hypoechoic lesions in the peripheral zone of the prostate]. J Belge Radiol. 1995 Dec;78(6):356-8. Dutch.
Sibley RI, Sibley AF. Correlation of digital rectal examination, prostate specific antigen, and transrectal ultrasound in prostate carcinoma in African Americans. J Natl Med Assoc. 1997 May;89(5):318-23.
Norberg M, Egevad L, Holmberg L, Sparen P, Norlen BJ, Busch C. The sextant protocol for ultrasound-guided core biopsies of the prostate underestimates the presence of cancer. Urology. 1997 Oct;50(4):562-6. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00306-3.
Halpern EJ, Ramey JR, Strup SE, Frauscher F, McCue P, Gomella LG. Detection of prostate carcinoma with contrast-enhanced sonography using intermittent harmonic imaging. Cancer. 2005 Dec 1;104(11):2373-83. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21440.
Mitterberger M, Pinggera GM, Horninger W, Bartsch G, Strasser H, Schafer G, Brunner A, Halpern EJ, Gradl J, Pallwein L, Frauscher F. Comparison of contrast enhanced color Doppler targeted biopsy to conventional systematic biopsy: impact on Gleason score. J Urol. 2007 Aug;178(2):464-8; discussion 468. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.107. Epub 2007 Jun 11.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
H14-00830
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.