Whole Body Bone Scan vs 18F-Choline PET/CT in Prostate Cancer
NCT ID: NCT02232685
Last Updated: 2016-10-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
143 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-09-30
2016-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Better initial staging will result in better treatment of the individual patient. If we are able to develop a more accurate method of staging patients with undetected metastases on current staging will be spared of the side-effects associated with current treatment - impotence, incontinence, radiation damage etc.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Choline PET/CT vs. MeAIB PET/CT in Prostate Cancer
NCT02232672
Diagnostic Imaging of Bone Metastases in Prostate Cancer Patients
NCT03134261
Novel Imaging in Staging of Primary Prostate Cancer
NCT03537391
Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (PMSA)-Based PET Imaging of High Risk Prostate Cancer
NCT03976843
Whole Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study
NCT04117594
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The aetiology of the disease is not well understood. In its most common form PCa evolves from the glandular tissue of the prostate. Metastatic spread will most commonly happen as lymphogenous spread to the regional lymph nodes or as haematogenous spread to the red bone marrow .
Intended curative treatment of PCa is associated with considerable side effects, in particular incontinence, impotence and radiation damage to the surrounding tissues. Furthermore, over 30% of patients with organ-confined disease, which was treated with radical prostatectomy, will have biochemical relapse within 10 years . Relapse may be due to local recurrent disease suggesting poor surgical quality or poor initial staging with undetected metastases at the time of treatment.
At diagnosis patients are stratified as having low, intermediary or high risk of dissieminatio according to D'Amico. Patients with intermediate or high risk of dissemination will be examined further with whole-body bone scintigraphy (WBS) and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND).
2. Background. 2.1. Current staging and limitations. WBS has been the examination of choice for evaluation of potential dissemination to bone. WBS utilizes 99mTc-labeled methylene diphosphonate (99mTc-MDP) that binds to the bone matrix formed by the osteoblasts. Gamma cameras detect the γ-radiation emitted by the decaying tracer thereby creating a 2-dimentional image depicting local osteoblast activity .
Several limitations apply to the use of WBS in staging of patients with PCa. Sensitivity has reported as low as 39% in lesion-based analysis in patients with a low number of lesions . This combines with a low sensitivity due to many equivocal lesions caused by other bone pathology than metastasis.
Sensitivity and specificity is improved by the use of single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), where the same tracer as with WBS is used to generate a three-dimensional image using a rotating gamma camera. This method also gives better anatomical information on the exact position of a potential metastasis.
The examination of choice for the evaluation of potential metastases to lymph nodes is extended PLND . This procedure is done either prior to radiotherapy or during prostatectomy in patients with intermediate or high risk of dissemination. The optimal extent of the dissection is debated. The extended PLND performed at our institution includes the nodes in the obturator fossa, the nodes over the external iliac artery and vein, the nodes around the internal iliac artery and the nodes along the common iliac artery up to the crossing of the ureter. This dissection is assumed to include approximately 75% of lymph nodes known to harbor primary prostatic lymph node metastases . Extended PLND is surgically demanding with risk of lymphocele formation, infectious complications and severe bleeding due the lymph nodes' close proximity to the large vessels in the pelvis. All in all extended PLND is perhaps the best option for lymph node staging of PCa but it cannot be considered as optimal due to the above-mentioned issues.
2.2 Positron Emission Tomography (PET). Positron Emission Tomography combined with Computerized Tomography (PET/CT) is a well-established tool in diagnosing and staging of several types of cancer . PET is an imaging technique where pairs of gamma rays emitted by positron-emitting radionuclide tracer are detected, producing a three-dimensional image of tracer concentration based on the amount of gamma rays emitted. The radioactive tracer is coupled to a biologically active molecule depending on the organ or metabolic process of interest . These images can then be fused with CT to create a combined functional and high-resolution anatomical image. Several tracers have been developed for use in cancer diagnostics and staging. As of now, PET/CT has no generally accepted role in the diagnosing or staging of PCa neither in Europe nor in the US .
2.2.1 Choline. Choline is a precursor for phosphatidylcholine, a phospholipid that is integrated in the cell membrane making it a marker for cell membrane turnover and metabolism . 11C-Choline was first used as a PET tracer in 1997 . Since then many studies have been performed with 11C-Choline and later 18F-Choline (FCH) having approximately the same properties as 11C-Choline, but with a longer half-life (110 min vs. 20 min) making it more versatile in every-day use. A recent study from our department tested the use of FCH-PET/CT in detecting lymph node metastasis in 210 patients with PCa . The study concluded that FCH-PET/CT was not ideally suited for lymph node staging but could give additional information about bone metastasis. Several other investigators have also implied this , . A likely reason for the better detection of metastasis to the bone is that bone metastasis in an early stage is actually bone-marrow metastases rather than bone matrix metastasis and that it most likely that bone-marrow metastases proceed to bone matrix metastases. These will not be detectable by WBS (and probably not by CT and MRI either). Larger prospective series on the use of FCH-PET/CT for imaging of bone metastasis in PCa-patients have not yet been produced.
3. Trial objective. To compare the diagnostic accuracy in detecting bone metastases of WBS, SPECT and FCH PET/CT in 280 patients with newly diagnosed PCa with intermediate or high risk of disseminated disease
4. Method. The patients will have two scans performed, first one with two acquisitions using only one administration of tracer i.e. a WBS followed by a SPECT acquisition and on another day a FCH-PET/CT. Image acquisition will be performed approximately 60 min after intravenous injection of the tracer.
The scans are performed in random order within three weeks and the images interpreted by a specialist in nuclear medicine and a specialist in radiology. Patients who already have had WBS performed will only have a FCH-PET/CT performed.
Images are interpreted based on visual evaluation with supplementary measurements of Standardized uptake values (SUV).
In case of agreement between the scans, the patient will proceed to clinical treatment as usual. In case of disagreement between the three modalities a MRI will be performed on the lesion of interest. If the results after MRI are still inconclusive a bone biopsy with emphasis on getting marrow tissue as well as bone matrix, will be performed. This will in many cases not be possible due to the size of the lesion and in these cases MRI will serve as reference standard.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Choline PET/CT
18F-Choline PET/CT
18F-Choline PET/CT
18F-Choline PET/CT
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
18F-Choline PET/CT
18F-Choline PET/CT
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Written consent and
* PSA ≥ 20 ng/mL and/or
* Gleason score \> 6 and/or
* cT-stage ≥ cT2c
Exclusion Criteria
* Other active malign disease
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Odense University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mike Allan Mortensen
MD
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Odense University Hospiatal
Odense, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MAM_PROSTAGE1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.