Development of a New Tool for Dyspnea Measurement in Chronic Respiratory Diseases
NCT ID: NCT02229994
Last Updated: 2025-11-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
199 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2010-03-16
2015-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Detect and Infer the Severity of COPD by Intelligent Terminal Device
NCT05551169
Predictive Properties of the 6-Minute Stepper Test for Mortality in COPD
NCT06703359
A Study for the Assessment of the Words Used by Patients and Physicians to Express the Symptoms of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
NCT01219946
Prevalence and Characterization of Persistent Dyspnea After Hospitalization
NCT03798158
Evaluate the Accuracy of a COPD Screening Algorithm Model
NCT06109974
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
According to the ATS dyspnea is the term used to characterize a subjective experience of breathing discomfort, covering qualitatively distinct sensations of varying intensity.
The subjective nature of dyspnea and the high complexity of its determinants explain the often moderate correlations obtained with physiological data. Dyspnea must therefore be measured specifically.
The aim of this study is the cross-sectional and longitudinal psychometric validation of a self-administered dyspnea questionnaire (assessing the impact of dyspnea on activities restriction), usable in clinical practice in order to assess dyspnea and its alterations in adult patients with chronic respiratory diseases.
(COPD, diffuse interstitial lung diseases, Pulmonary arterial hypertension, Cystic fibrosis)
Like any psychometric instrument, an efficient evaluation of dyspnea scale should ideally satisfy all the following required features: evaluative, discriminant, good reproducibility, and high sensitivity to change.
The desired features apart from content validity are reproducibility and especially a high sensitivity to change, particularly following pulmonary rehabilitation.
Thus, this questionnaire should precisely enable to assess the benefit of rehabilitation and it's sustainment in maintenance phase.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Adults patients with chronic respiratory diseases
\- 200 adult patients with chronic respiratory diseases will be studied longitudinally and transversely (follow-up: 6 months) in 12 centres.
1. Sample 1 (n=110 patients) with COPD
2. Sample 2 (n=30 patients) with Diffuse interstitial lung diseases
3. Sample 3 (n=30 patients) with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension primary or secondary (post embolic .....).
4. Sample 4 (n=30 patients) Adult with Cystic fibrosis
Cross sectional psychometric evaluation of a self-administered dyspnea questionnaire.
Evaluation will be performed on a group of 200 patients deriving from 4 samples.
* From these 200 patients, a sub-sample will be evaluated at 7 days (DYSLIM questionnaire only) for reproducibility (n = 50 patients: 10 patients with diffuse interstitial lung disease, 10 patients with cystic fibrosis, 10 patients with arterial pulmonary hypertension, 20 patients with COPD).
* From these 200 patients, a sub-sample (COPD, n = 60) will be recruited among patients undergoing pulmonary rehabilitation at the beginning of the 6 months separating follow up visit and the initial assessment.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cross sectional psychometric evaluation of a self-administered dyspnea questionnaire.
Evaluation will be performed on a group of 200 patients deriving from 4 samples.
* From these 200 patients, a sub-sample will be evaluated at 7 days (DYSLIM questionnaire only) for reproducibility (n = 50 patients: 10 patients with diffuse interstitial lung disease, 10 patients with cystic fibrosis, 10 patients with arterial pulmonary hypertension, 20 patients with COPD).
* From these 200 patients, a sub-sample (COPD, n = 60) will be recruited among patients undergoing pulmonary rehabilitation at the beginning of the 6 months separating follow up visit and the initial assessment.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Sample 1A: n = 50: group of patients with no change in usual care and no acute event (evaluation of reproducibility)
* Sample1B: n = 60: patients assessed before and after a qualifying period of pulmonary rehabilitation
* 2\) Sample 2 (n = 30): diffuse interstitial lung diseases Criteria: Pulmonary Fibrosis: Idiopathic or nonspecific interstitial lung diseases (NILD) according to international criteria (ATS), sarcoidosis with parenchymal lesions (old classification stage II and III), and exceptionally alveolar proteinosis.
* 3\) Sample 3 (n = 30) primary or secondary arterial pulmonary hypertension (post embolic .....).
* 4\) Sample4 (n = 30): Adult with Cystic fibrosis.
* 5\) patient with stable Status (no exacerbation for at least one month)
Exclusion Criteria
* 2\) Inability to fill in questionnaires
* 3\) Other respiratory disease
* 4\) left symptomatic heart failure
* 5\) Obesity with a BMI\> 35 kg/m2
* 6\) Inability to perform PFT (Pulmonary Function Testing)
* 7\) Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
* 8\) Patient unable to consent
* 9\) Lack of social insurance coverage
* 10\) Patient in exclusion period because of another protocol
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Pr Joel COSTE, Hôpital Hôtel Dieu - Unité de Bio Statistiques et Epidémiologiques, Paris
UNKNOWN
URC-CIC Paris Descartes Necker Cochin
OTHER
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Thierry Perez, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
CHRU de Lille / Hôpital Calmette - France
Nicolas ROCHE, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
APHP- Hopital Cochin
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Service de Pneumologie AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Centre
Paris, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2009-A00181-56
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.