Study of Sedative Medications in Patients With Severe Infection and Respiratory Failure

NCT ID: NCT02203019

Last Updated: 2020-03-02

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

36 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-08-31

Study Completion Date

2016-09-22

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patients with infections in their blood often become very sick. These patients are usually put in an intensive care unit for careful observation and treatment. These patients may develop a low blood pressure, lung failure, and kidney failure. When these problems develop, care becomes quite complicated. Patients with lung failure often need help with a breathing machine to make certain that the breathing is adequate. The machine helps keep the oxygen level high enough for healthy tissues. When patients are placed on the machine for breathing they require a tube to be placed into lungs. This can be quite uncomfortable. These patients need sedation to help them tolerate the uncomfortable breathing tube and other parts of their routine necessary care. This study will compare two drugs (dexmedetomidine and propofol) which are frequently used for sedation in intensive care patients. Clinical studies suggest that these drugs are both effective and safe. The main question is whether or not one of the drugs is better in a patient with a blood infection. This study will try to determine that. Our main goal is to see whether or not patients on one particular drug come off the breathing machine faster than patients on the other drug. These drugs are not experimental drugs and are approved by the Food and Drug Administration. There is no placebo drug being used in this study. All patients in this study will receive the best possible care based on their medical condition.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients admitted to the MICU with acute respiratory care and possible sepsis will be evaluated and managed by the internal medicine MICU team. This team includes faculty members, pulmonary fellows, and internal medicine residents. These physicians will make all the decisions regarding the initial management of the patient. The admitting team will be approached by the study investigators to solicit their support for the recruitment of the patient into the study. During some periods of time the study investigators will be directly involved in the patient care.

The general approach to managing patients with sepsis includes blood cultures, serum lactate levels, and empiric antibiotics. Other cultures from the respiratory tract, urinary tract, and other sites are also obtained as indicated. Empiric antibiotic choices will be based on the most likely source of infection. Patient will receive fluid administration and vasopressors to maintain mean arterial pressure blood pressures greater than or equal to 60 mmHg.

Mechanical ventilation support will follow ARDS network guidelines. In general patients will be on an assist-control mode, a low tidal volume (6 mm/kg ideal body weight), and a FiO2 adequate to maintain O2 saturations greater than equal to 90%. PEEP levels will be based on the FiO2 using ARDS network recommendations. The ventilator management goal is to have the lowest possible plateau pressure and lowest FiO2 possible to maintain adequate ventilation and oxygenation.

Fentanyl will be routinely ordered for analgesia. Per current UMC policy, initial fentanyl boluses will be given at 50mcg IV every 2 hours as needed to keep pain level less than 4/10. At the discretion of the provider, a fentanyl drip may be administered if intermittent fentanyl does not achieve adequate analgesia. If a fentanyl drip is initiated, the drip will have a range of 25-200 mcg/hour to achieve a pain level of less than 4/10. If an allergy to fentanyl is documented, the patient will be excluded from the study.

Once a mechanically ventilated patient with sepsis is selected for enrollment, the patient will be randomized (via a computer-generated randomization program) to one of two sedation arms: 1) propofol, or 2) dexmedetomidine.

Per current UMC policy, propofol will be initiated at 5 mcg/kg/minute (0.3mg/kg/hour) and titrated every 5 minutes by 5mcg/kg/minute to RASS (Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale) goal -1 to +1. The maximum dose of propofol will be 80 mcg/kg/minute.

Dexmedetomidine will be initiated at 0.2 mcg/kg/hour and will be titrated every 5 minutes by 0.1mcg/kg/hour to a maximum dose of 1.4 mcg/kg/hour to a RASS goal of -1 to +1. Although dexmedetomidine has only been approved in the United States for short-term sedation of ICU patients (\< 24 hrs) at a maximal dose of 0.7 μg/kg/hr (up to 1.0 μg/kg/h for procedural sedation), several studies demonstrate the safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine infusions administered for greater than 24 hrs (up to 28 days) and at higher doses (up to 1.5 μg/kg/hr).

Daily sedation stops will be performed in both study arms per MICU weaning policy. Patients will be allowed to return to a RASS of 0 to +1, and the physician will be alerted for assessment. If the physician determines sedation needs to be re-started, it will be at 50% of the dose prior to the sedation stop. This dose will then be titrated to a RASS goal of -1 to +1.

Patients with inadequate sedation scores on their assigned drug will receive supplemental sedation with midazolam or lorazepam using IV boluses as needed based on nursing and physician assessment.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sepsis Respiratory Failure Agitation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Propofol

Propofol will be administered for sedation.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Propofol

Intervention Type DRUG

Propofol will be administered for sedation in mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis.

Fentanyl

Intervention Type DRUG

Fentanyl will be administered for analgesia in mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis. The use of Fentanyl is not an intervention "of interest".

Dexmedetomidine

Dexmedetomidine will be administered for sedation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Dexmedetomidine

Intervention Type DRUG

Dexmedetomidine will be administered for sedation in mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis.

Fentanyl

Intervention Type DRUG

Fentanyl will be administered for analgesia in mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis. The use of Fentanyl is not an intervention "of interest".

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Propofol

Propofol will be administered for sedation in mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis.

Intervention Type DRUG

Dexmedetomidine

Dexmedetomidine will be administered for sedation in mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis.

Intervention Type DRUG

Fentanyl

Fentanyl will be administered for analgesia in mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis. The use of Fentanyl is not an intervention "of interest".

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Diprivan Precedex

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Men and women 18-89 years old
* with the diagnosis of sepsis (as specified below) within the previous 24 hours
* who require mechanical ventilation, and
* provide informed consent either personally or by an authorized representative.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with documented allergies to propofol, dexmedetomidine, fentanyl, eggs or egg products, or soy or soy products.
* A heart rate less than 50 beats/minute or grade 2 or 3 AV heart block
* Mean arterial pressure less than 55 mmHg despite appropriate fluid resuscitation and vasopressor support.
* Current triglyceride level \> 400 mg/dl
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

89 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kenneth Nugent, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Medical Center

Lubbock, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Carson SS, Kress JP, Rodgers JE, Vinayak A, Campbell-Bright S, Levitt J, Bourdet S, Ivanova A, Henderson AG, Pohlman A, Chang L, Rich PB, Hall J. A randomized trial of intermittent lorazepam versus propofol with daily interruption in mechanically ventilated patients. Crit Care Med. 2006 May;34(5):1326-32. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000215513.63207.7F.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16540958 (View on PubMed)

Pandharipande PP, Pun BT, Herr DL, Maze M, Girard TD, Miller RR, Shintani AK, Thompson JL, Jackson JC, Deppen SA, Stiles RA, Dittus RS, Bernard GR, Ely EW. Effect of sedation with dexmedetomidine vs lorazepam on acute brain dysfunction in mechanically ventilated patients: the MENDS randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2007 Dec 12;298(22):2644-53. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.22.2644.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18073360 (View on PubMed)

Pandharipande PP, Sanders RD, Girard TD, McGrane S, Thompson JL, Shintani AK, Herr DL, Maze M, Ely EW; MENDS investigators. Effect of dexmedetomidine versus lorazepam on outcome in patients with sepsis: an a priori-designed analysis of the MENDS randomized controlled trial. Crit Care. 2010;14(2):R38. doi: 10.1186/cc8916. Epub 2010 Mar 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20233428 (View on PubMed)

Jakob SM, Ruokonen E, Grounds RM, Sarapohja T, Garratt C, Pocock SJ, Bratty JR, Takala J; Dexmedetomidine for Long-Term Sedation Investigators. Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam or propofol for sedation during prolonged mechanical ventilation: two randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 2012 Mar 21;307(11):1151-60. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.304.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22436955 (View on PubMed)

American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference: definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. Crit Care Med. 1992 Jun;20(6):864-74.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 1597042 (View on PubMed)

Sigler MB, Islam EA, Nugent K. Comparison of dexmedetomidine and propofol in mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis: a pilot study. The Southwest Respiratory and Critical Care Chronicles 2018;6(22):10-15.

Reference Type RESULT

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

L14-136

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Dexmedetomidine for Continuous Sedation
NCT00226785 TERMINATED PHASE3