Efficacy and Safety Study of Darolutamide (ODM-201) in Men With High-risk Non-metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer

NCT ID: NCT02200614

Last Updated: 2022-06-28

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

1509 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-09-12

Study Completion Date

2021-06-14

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of BAY1841788 (ODM-201) in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Prostate Cancer Non-Metastatic Castration-Resistant

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Darolutamide (BAY1841788)

Participants received Darolutamide 600 mg (2 tablets of 300 mg) twice daily with food, equal to a total daily dose of 1200 mg.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Darolutamide (Nubeqa, BAY1841788)

Intervention Type DRUG

Darolutamide 600 mg (2 tablets of 300 mg) twice daily with food, equivalent to a total daily dose of 1200 mg.

Placebo

Participants received matching placebo 2 tablets twice daily with food.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Matching placebo 2 tablets twice daily with food.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Darolutamide (Nubeqa, BAY1841788)

Darolutamide 600 mg (2 tablets of 300 mg) twice daily with food, equivalent to a total daily dose of 1200 mg.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Matching placebo 2 tablets twice daily with food.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

ODM-201

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Histologically or cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of prostate without neuroendocrine differentiation or small cell features.
* Castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) with castrate level of serum testosterone.
* Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) doubling time of ≤ 10 months and PSA \> 2ng/ml.
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1.
* Blood counts at screening: haemoglobin ≥ 9.0 g/dl,absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1500/µl, platelet count ≥ 100,000/µl.
* Screening values of serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and/or aspartate transaminase (AST) ≤ 2.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN), total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x ULN, creatinine ≤ 2.0 x ULN.
* Sexually active patients, unless surgically sterile, must agree to use condoms as an effective barrier method and refrain from sperm donation during the study treatment and for 3 months after the end of the study treatment.

Exclusion Criteria

* History of metastatic disease at any time or presence of detectable metastases.
* Acute toxicities of prior treatments and procedures not resolved to grade ≤ 1 or baseline before randomisation.
* Prior treatment with: second generation androgen receptor (AR) inhibitors, other investigational AR inhibitors, or CYP17 enzyme inhibitor.
* Use of estrogens or 5-α reductase inhibitors or AR inhibitors.
* Prior chemotherapy or immunotherapy for prostate cancer.
* Use of systemic corticosteroid.
* Radiation therapy within 12 weeks before randomisation.
* Severe or uncontrolled concurrent disease, infection or co-morbidity.
* Treatment with bisphosphonate or denosumab within 12 weeks before randomisation.
* Known hypersensitivity to the study treatment or any of its ingredients.
* Major surgery within 28 days before randomisation.
* Any of the following within 6 months before randomisation: stroke, myocardial infarction, severe/unstable angina pectoris, coronary/peripheral artery bypass graft; congestive heart failure New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III or IV.
* Uncontrolled hypertension.
* Prior malignancy.
* Gastrointestinal disorder or procedure which expects to interfere significantly with absorption of study treatment.
* Active viral hepatitis, active human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or chronic liver disease.
* Treatment with any investigational drug within 28 days before randomisation.
* Any condition that in the opinion of the investigator would impair the patients' ability to comply with the study procedures.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Orion Corporation, Orion Pharma

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Bayer

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bayer Study Director

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Bayer

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Homewood, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Anchorage, Alaska, United States

Site Status

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Fountain Valley, California, United States

Site Status

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

Laguna Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Whittier, California, United States

Site Status

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Parker, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Boca Raton, Florida, United States

Site Status

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Port Saint Lucie, Florida, United States

Site Status

Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Evanston, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Springfield, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Greenwood, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Jeffersonville, Indiana, United States

Site Status

West Des Moines, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Annapolis, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Salisbury, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Royal Oak, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States

Site Status

Voorhees Township, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Syracuse, New York, United States

Site Status

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

Asheboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Canton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Gahanna, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Middleburg Heights, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Bala-Cynwyd, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Fairfax, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Wheeling, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Buenos Aires, Ciudad Auton. de Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Santa Fé, Santa Fe Province, Argentina

Site Status

San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán Province, Argentina

Site Status

Córdoba, , Argentina

Site Status

Córdoba, , Argentina

Site Status

Córdoba, , Argentina

Site Status

La Rioja, , Argentina

Site Status

Randwick, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Douglas, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Kurralta Park, South Australia, Australia

Site Status

Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Lesnoy, , Belarus

Site Status

Minsk, , Belarus

Site Status

Bonheiden, , Belgium

Site Status

Kortrijk, , Belgium

Site Status

Libramont, , Belgium

Site Status

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

Sint-Truiden, , Belgium

Site Status

Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil

Site Status

Salvador, Estado de Bahia, Brazil

Site Status

Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil

Site Status

Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil

Site Status

Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil

Site Status

Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil

Site Status

Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil

Site Status

Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil

Site Status

Passo Fundo, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

Itajaí, Santa Catarina, Brazil

Site Status

Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Jaú, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Ribeirao Preto - SP, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Sorocaba, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Varna, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status

Burlington, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Granby, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Pointe-Claire, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia

Site Status

Montería, Departamento de Córdoba, Colombia

Site Status

Floridablanca, Santander Department, Colombia

Site Status

Jablonec nad Nisou, , Czechia

Site Status

Kolín, , Czechia

Site Status

Olomouc, , Czechia

Site Status

Opava, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Tallinn, , Estonia

Site Status

Helsinki, , Finland

Site Status

Kuopio, , Finland

Site Status

Seinäjoki, , Finland

Site Status

Tampere, , Finland

Site Status

Turku, , Finland

Site Status

Angers, , France

Site Status

Bayonne, , France

Site Status

Besançon, , France

Site Status

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Caen, , France

Site Status

Cergy-Pontoise, , France

Site Status

Clermont-Ferrand, , France

Site Status

Créteil, , France

Site Status

Dijon, , France

Site Status

La Roche-sur-Yon, , France

Site Status

Limoges, , France

Site Status

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Nancy, , France

Site Status

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Pierre-Bénite, , France

Site Status

Poitiers, , France

Site Status

Reims, , France

Site Status

Rennes, , France

Site Status

Rouen, , France

Site Status

Saint-Mandé, , France

Site Status

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status

Suresnes, , France

Site Status

Tours, , France

Site Status

Villejuif, , France

Site Status

Emmendingen, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Kirchheim unter Teck, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Mühlacker, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Nürtingen, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Reutlingen, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Tübingen, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Zirndorf, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, Germany

Site Status

Marburg, Hesse, Germany

Site Status

Herzberg am Harz, Lower Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Holzminden, Lower Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Hagenow, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany

Site Status

Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Düsseldorf, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Mülheim, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Wuppertal, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany

Site Status

Dresden, Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Magdeburg, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Debrecen, , Hungary

Site Status

Győr, , Hungary

Site Status

Nyíregyháza, , Hungary

Site Status

Szeged, , Hungary

Site Status

Szekszárd, , Hungary

Site Status

Szolnok, , Hungary

Site Status

Zalaegerszeg, , Hungary

Site Status

Haifa, , Israel

Site Status

Chieti, Abruzzo, Italy

Site Status

Lecce, Apulia, Italy

Site Status

Catanzaro, Calabria, Italy

Site Status

Napoli, Campania, Italy

Site Status

Forlì Cesena, Emilia-Romagna, Italy

Site Status

Modena, Emilia-Romagna, Italy

Site Status

Parma, Emilia-Romagna, Italy

Site Status

Rome, Lazio, Italy

Site Status

Rome, Lazio, Italy

Site Status

Turin, Piedmont, Italy

Site Status

Turin, Piedmont, Italy

Site Status

Messina, Sicily, Italy

Site Status

Palermo, Sicily, Italy

Site Status

Arezzo, Tuscany, Italy

Site Status

Nagoya, Aichi-ken, Japan

Site Status

Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan

Site Status

Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan

Site Status

Kōriyama, Fukushima, Japan

Site Status

Maebashi, Gunma, Japan

Site Status

Ōtake, Hiroshima, Japan

Site Status

Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan

Site Status

Kobe, Hyōgo, Japan

Site Status

Higashiibaraki, Ibaraki, Japan

Site Status

Kanazawa, Ishikawa-ken, Japan

Site Status

Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan

Site Status

Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan

Site Status

Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan

Site Status

Sendai, Miyagi, Japan

Site Status

Ueda, Nagano, Japan

Site Status

Kashihara, Nara, Japan

Site Status

Yufu, Oita Prefecture, Japan

Site Status

Sayama, Osaka, Japan

Site Status

Wako, Saitama, Japan

Site Status

Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan

Site Status

Utsunomiya, Tochigi, Japan

Site Status

Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Mitaka, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Nakano-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Sumida-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan

Site Status

Chiba, , Japan

Site Status

Fukui, , Japan

Site Status

Hiroshima, , Japan

Site Status

Kyoto, , Japan

Site Status

Nagasaki, , Japan

Site Status

Nagasaki, , Japan

Site Status

Okayama, , Japan

Site Status

Osaka, , Japan

Site Status

Osaka, , Japan

Site Status

Osaka, , Japan

Site Status

Toyama, , Japan

Site Status

Daugavpils, , Latvia

Site Status

Jelgava, , Latvia

Site Status

Leipaja, , Latvia

Site Status

Riga, , Latvia

Site Status

Riga, , Latvia

Site Status

Riga, , Latvia

Site Status

Kaunas, , Lithuania

Site Status

Kaunas, , Lithuania

Site Status

Klaipėda, , Lithuania

Site Status

Vilnius, , Lithuania

Site Status

Vilnius, , Lithuania

Site Status

La Victoria, Arequipa, Peru

Site Status

Lima, , Peru

Site Status

Lima, , Peru

Site Status

San Isidro, , Peru

Site Status

Elblag, , Poland

Site Status

Gdansk, , Poland

Site Status

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Otwock, , Poland

Site Status

Rzeszów, , Poland

Site Status

Siedlce, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Guimarães, Braga District, Portugal

Site Status

Almada, Lisbon District, Portugal

Site Status

Matosinhos Municipality, Porto District, Portugal

Site Status

Braga, , Portugal

Site Status

Lisbon, , Portugal

Site Status

Lisbon, , Portugal

Site Status

Lisbon, , Portugal

Site Status

Lisbon, , Portugal

Site Status

Porto, , Portugal

Site Status

Porto, , Portugal

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Cluj-Napoca, , Romania

Site Status

Craiova, , Romania

Site Status

Craiova, , Romania

Site Status

Oradea, , Romania

Site Status

Ploieşti, , Romania

Site Status

Târgu Mureş, , Romania

Site Status

Chelyabinsk, , Russia

Site Status

Ivanovo, , Russia

Site Status

Kazan', , Russia

Site Status

Krasnoyarsk, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Nizhny Novgorod, , Russia

Site Status

Novosibirsk, , Russia

Site Status

Obninsk, , Russia

Site Status

Omsk, , Russia

Site Status

Orenburg, , Russia

Site Status

Pyatigorsk, , Russia

Site Status

Rostov-on-Don, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Saratov, , Russia

Site Status

Tyumen, , Russia

Site Status

Ufa, , Russia

Site Status

Vladimir, , Russia

Site Status

Belgrade, , Serbia

Site Status

Belgrade, , Serbia

Site Status

Niš, , Serbia

Site Status

Bratislava, , Slovakia

Site Status

Bratislava, , Slovakia

Site Status

Martin, , Slovakia

Site Status

Trenčín, , Slovakia

Site Status

George, Eastern Cape, South Africa

Site Status

Port Elizabeth, Eastern Cape, South Africa

Site Status

Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa

Site Status

Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa

Site Status

Paarl, Western Cape, South Africa

Site Status

Rondebosch, Western Cape, South Africa

Site Status

Cape Town, , South Africa

Site Status

Cape Town, , South Africa

Site Status

Gwangju, Gwangju Gwang''yeogsi, South Korea

Site Status

Cheongju-si, North Chungcheong, South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, Seoul Teugbyeolsi, South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, Seoul Teugbyeolsi, South Korea

Site Status

Daegu, , South Korea

Site Status

Daegu, , South Korea

Site Status

Incheon, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Elche, Alicante, Spain

Site Status

Cadiz, Andalusia, Spain

Site Status

L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Jerez de la Frontera, Cádiz, Spain

Site Status

Manacor, Illes Baleares, Spain

Site Status

Palma de Mallorca, Illes Baleares, Spain

Site Status

Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Bilbao, Vizcaya, Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Córdoba, , Spain

Site Status

Granada, , Spain

Site Status

Lugo, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Málaga, , Spain

Site Status

Salamanca, , Spain

Site Status

Seville, , Spain

Site Status

Seville, , Spain

Site Status

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Gothenburg, , Sweden

Site Status

Örebro, , Sweden

Site Status

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Uppsala, , Sweden

Site Status

Kaohsiung City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Kaoshiung, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taichung, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taoyuan District, , Taiwan

Site Status

Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Izmir, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Izmir, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Manisa, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Sivas, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Chernivtsi, , Ukraine

Site Status

Dnipro, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kharkiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kryvyi Rih, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kyiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kyiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Uzhhorod, , Ukraine

Site Status

Zaporizhzhya, , Ukraine

Site Status

Reading, Berkshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Llanelli, Carmarthenshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Romford, Essex, United Kingdom

Site Status

Stevenage, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Dartford, Kent, United Kingdom

Site Status

Maidstone, Kent, United Kingdom

Site Status

Preston, Lancashire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Bebington, Merseyside, United Kingdom

Site Status

Scunthorpe, North East Lincolnshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom

Site Status

Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Dudley, West Midlands, United Kingdom

Site Status

Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Wakefield, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Cardiff, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Glasgow, , United Kingdom

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Australia Austria Belarus Belgium Brazil Bulgaria Canada Colombia Czechia Estonia Finland France Germany Hungary Israel Italy Japan Latvia Lithuania Peru Poland Portugal Romania Russia Serbia Slovakia South Africa South Korea Spain Sweden Taiwan Turkey (Türkiye) Ukraine United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ni X, Sui J, Wang B, Wang H, Freedland SJ, Ye D, Zhu Y. Lower Testosterone Level and Metastases-Free Survival in Patients With Nonmetastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Treated With Novel Antiandrogens: A Post Hoc Analysis of SPARTAN and ARAMIS. J Urol. 2025 Jul;214(1):10-17. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004545. Epub 2025 Mar 25.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40132221 (View on PubMed)

Shore ND, Gratzke C, Feyerabend S, Werbrouck P, Carles J, Vjaters E, Tammela TLJ, Morris D, Aragon-Ching JB, Concepcion RS, Emmenegger U, Fleshner N, Grabbert M, Lietuvietis V, Mahammedi H, Cruz FM, Paula A, Pieczonka C, Rannikko A, Richardet M, Silveira G, Kuss I, Le Berre MA, Verholen F, Sarapohja T, Smith MR, Fizazi K. Extended Safety and Tolerability of Darolutamide for Nonmetastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer and Adverse Event Time Course in ARAMIS. Oncologist. 2024 Jul 5;29(7):581-588. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae019.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38394384 (View on PubMed)

Fizazi K, Shore ND, Smith M, Ramos R, Jones R, Niegisch G, Vjaters E, Wang Y, Srinivasan S, Sarapohja T, Verholen F. Efficacy and safety outcomes of darolutamide in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with comorbidities and concomitant medications from the randomised phase 3 ARAMIS trial. Eur J Cancer. 2023 Oct;192:113258. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113258. Epub 2023 Jul 27.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37660438 (View on PubMed)

Carles J, Medina-Lopez RA, Puente J, Gomez-Ferrer A, Nebra JC, Saez Medina MI, Ribal MJ, Antolin AR, Alvarez-Ossorio JL, Suarez Novo JF, Agut CM, Srinivasan S, Ortiz J, Fizazi K. Darolutamide in Spanish patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: ARAMIS subgroup analysis. Future Oncol. 2023 Apr;19(12):819-828. doi: 10.2217/fon-2022-1131. Epub 2023 May 24.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37222151 (View on PubMed)

Shore ND, Stenzl A, Pieczonka C, Klaassen Z, Aronson WJ, Karsh L, Ryan CJ, Ortiz J, Srinivasan S, Mohamed AF, Verholen F. Impact of darolutamide on local symptoms: pre-planned and post hoc analyses of the ARAMIS trial. BJU Int. 2023 Apr;131(4):452-460. doi: 10.1111/bju.15887. Epub 2022 Sep 29.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36087070 (View on PubMed)

Chowdhury S, Oudard S, Uemura H, Joniau S, Dearden L, Capone C, Van Sanden S, Diels J, Hadaschik BA. Apalutamide Compared with Darolutamide for the Treatment of Non-metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Efficacy and Tolerability in a Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison. Adv Ther. 2022 Jan;39(1):518-531. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01885-6. Epub 2021 Nov 19.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34797506 (View on PubMed)

Fizazi K, Blue I, Nowak JT. Darolutamide and survival in nonmetastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer: a patient perspective of the ARAMIS trial. Future Oncol. 2021 May;17(14):1699-1707. doi: 10.2217/fon-2020-1291. Epub 2021 Feb 8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33554636 (View on PubMed)

Fizazi K, Shore N, Tammela TL, Ulys A, Vjaters E, Polyakov S, Jievaltas M, Luz M, Alekseev B, Kuss I, Le Berre MA, Petrenciuc O, Snapir A, Sarapohja T, Smith MR; ARAMIS Investigators. Nonmetastatic, Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer and Survival with Darolutamide. N Engl J Med. 2020 Sep 10;383(11):1040-1049. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001342.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32905676 (View on PubMed)

Shore N, Zurth C, Fricke R, Gieschen H, Graudenz K, Koskinen M, Ploeger B, Moss J, Prien O, Borghesi G, Petrenciuc O, Tammela TL, Kuss I, Verholen F, Smith MR, Fizazi K. Evaluation of Clinically Relevant Drug-Drug Interactions and Population Pharmacokinetics of Darolutamide in Patients with Nonmetastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Results of Pre-Specified and Post Hoc Analyses of the Phase III ARAMIS Trial. Target Oncol. 2019 Oct;14(5):527-539. doi: 10.1007/s11523-019-00674-0.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31571095 (View on PubMed)

Fizazi K, Shore N, Tammela TL, Ulys A, Vjaters E, Polyakov S, Jievaltas M, Luz M, Alekseev B, Kuss I, Kappeler C, Snapir A, Sarapohja T, Smith MR; ARAMIS Investigators. Darolutamide in Nonmetastatic, Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019 Mar 28;380(13):1235-1246. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1815671. Epub 2019 Feb 14.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30763142 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/

Click here to find information about studies related to Bayer Healthcare products conducted in Europe.

http://clinicaltrials.bayer.com/

Click here to find results for studies related to Bayer products.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2013-003820-36

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

17712

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.