Pilot Study of Sedation With Propofol in Refractory Pains Due to Care in Palliative Care Unit
NCT ID: NCT02198404
Last Updated: 2023-11-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
10 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-06-20
2015-09-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The investigators believe that Propofol could be used in this instance
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficiency and Safety of a Procedural Sedation by Propofol on Terminally Ill Patients With Refractory Pain
NCT02734511
Randomized Study of Propofol Versus Fentanyl and Midazolam in Pediatric Patients Requiring Mechanical Ventilation and Sedation Therapy
NCT00004424
Pupilometric Evaluation of Patients Under Procedural Sedation With Propofol
NCT05750485
Ketamine-propofol Versus Ketamine Alone for Procedural Sedation in Adults
NCT01544725
SEvoflurane for Sedation in ARds
NCT04235608
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The investigators believe that Propofol could be used in this instance. The arguments in favour of Propofol include its pharmaco-kinetic characteristics and the fact that it is currently used in other circumstances. Propofol has an action delay which is more rapid that Midazolam therefore its effect is seen 1 minute after a bolus and 5 minutes after for Midazolam. The effect after a short administration lasts only a few minutes however the effect of Midazolam is more prolonged (sometimes several hours). As with Midazolam, a titrated use in weaker doses, should allow sufficient sedation, in the context which interests us, without marked secondary effects.
It is not unreasonable to think that the short action duration of Propofol could minimise respiratory risks in the hours after the treatment compared to Midazolam. With Propofol, the patient wakes as soon as the painful medical procedure has finished, with Midazolam sedation may be prolonged to several hours leading to a risk respiratory depression or secretion retention.
For these reasons; the investigators would like to verify that the use of Propofol is feasible in the context of refractory pain associated with medical procedures (dressing changes, movement during personal care tasks e.g. washing) in the palliative care unit. This is a preliminary study prior to completion of a more extensive multi-centre research project on the role Propofol could play in this situation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
sedation with propofol
propofol injection: induction with propofol at 20 mg/kg/h. When patient is sleeping, the dosage is deceased to 6 mg/kg/h
sedation with propofol
induction with propofol at 20mg/kg/h. Then, when the patient is sleeping, dosage is decreased to 6 mg/kg/h
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
sedation with propofol
induction with propofol at 20mg/kg/h. Then, when the patient is sleeping, dosage is decreased to 6 mg/kg/h
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* dying terminally patients
* pains resisting to fentanyl and MEOPA (Melange equimolaire Oxygène protocyde d'Azote) (EMONO = equimolar mixture of oxygene and nitrous oxide)
Exclusion Criteria
* contra-indication to egg lecithin
* Respiratory insufficiency
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
CIAIS Jean-François, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Nice University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Nice University Hospital
Nice, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
14-PP-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.