Three-Dimensional Hindfoot Alignment Measurements Based On Biplanar Radiographs: Prospective Clinical Feasibility Study
NCT ID: NCT02196415
Last Updated: 2018-10-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
50 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2014-07-31
2017-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* Today, hindfoot alignment is typically measured on hindfoot alignment view radiographs or long axial view radiographs. Measurements on both types of radiographs are hampered by technical shortcomings such as minimal rotational misplacement of the foot at the time of image acquisition. In previous publications our study groups demonstrated substantial measurement errors due to these shortcomings as well as bad interreader agreement.
* Hindfoot alignment measurement is feasible on MR images but hampered by the non-weight-bearing position of the patient and therefore not suited for pre-treatment evaluation.
* In an ex vivo study using plastic phantoms of a foot our research group could demonstrate superior interreader agreement and complete correction for foot misplacement at the time of image acquisition using a 3D secondary measurement technique based on biplanar low dose radiographs.
* Image acquisition using biplanar low dose radiographs is associated with a substantial reduction (about 1/7) of radiation dose applied to the patient compared to standard radiographs.
* Therefore the question arises if these excellent ex vivo results can be confirmed in a prospective clinical study.
Objectives:
1. Evaluation of technical feasibility of 3D hindfoot alignment measurements based on biplanar radiographs.
2. Reproduction of superior interreader agreement of measurements based on biplanar radiographs compared to measurements on conventional radiographs.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effectiveness of Subtalar Arthroereisis With Endorthesis for Pediatric Flexible Flat Foot
NCT03372642
3D Multisegment Foot Model Used for the Clinical Outcome After Ankle and Hindfoot Reconstruction
NCT04822558
Biomechanical Assessment of Gait in Lower-Extremity-Amputees
NCT01332123
Acute Efficacy of Exercises Applied With Xbox and Biodex Devices in Pes Planus"
NCT06238505
Radiological Outcomes of Modified Extra-articular LCL
NCT06562062
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Outcome(s): Hindfoot alignment measurement on standard radiographs and biplanar radiographs. The hindfoot angle is measured between the tibial axis and the calcaneal axis in degrees. Measurement results on plain films and based on 3D reconstructions will be compared.
Inclusion/Exclusion criteria:
* Inclusion: All patients referred for hindfoot alignment radiographs. These are all adults having suffered severe trauma or suffering from osteoarthrosis of the ankle joint. No inclusion of vulnerable participants.
* Exclusion criteria: Prior surgery, prior fracture, children and adolescents younger than the age of 20 years, known pregnancy.
Measurements and Procedures: Measurement of hindfoot alignment based on conventional radiographs and based on biplanar radiographs by two independent radiologists. Comparison of measurement results (paired-t-test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test) and calculation of interreader agreement (Intraclass correlation coefficient).
Study Product / Intervention: EOS low-dose biplanar x-ray scanner, EOS imaging, Paris, France One scan of the ankle joint to obtain an antero-posterior and lateral view.
Control Intervention: Conventional x-rays of the ankle joint (a.p., lateral, long axial or hindfoot alignment view) as referred from the clinician for treatment planning.
Number of Participants: 50 adults Based on a power analysis we think that this number of patients will enable reliable results. Because we do not know how big the differences between the measurements on standard radiographs and measurements on biplanar radiographs will be it is very difficult to perform a reasonable power analysis. In prior studies comparing torsion measurements on biplanar radiographs with CT measurements we were able to produce reliable results with the same number of patients.
Study Schedule:
First-Participant-In: June 2014 Last-Participant-Out: May 2015
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Biplanar Radiography
standard biplanar radiography of the foot
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Balgrist University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Florian M Buck, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Balgrist University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Radiology Department, Balgrist University Clinic
Zurich, Canton of Zurich, Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
KEK-ZH-Nr. 2013-0459
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.