Three-Dimensional Hindfoot Alignment Measurements Based On Biplanar Radiographs: Prospective Clinical Feasibility Study

NCT ID: NCT02196415

Last Updated: 2018-10-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-07-31

Study Completion Date

2017-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

* The measurement of hindfoot alignment is a technical challenge.
* Today, hindfoot alignment is typically measured on hindfoot alignment view radiographs or long axial view radiographs. Measurements on both types of radiographs are hampered by technical shortcomings such as minimal rotational misplacement of the foot at the time of image acquisition. In previous publications our study groups demonstrated substantial measurement errors due to these shortcomings as well as bad interreader agreement.
* Hindfoot alignment measurement is feasible on MR images but hampered by the non-weight-bearing position of the patient and therefore not suited for pre-treatment evaluation.
* In an ex vivo study using plastic phantoms of a foot our research group could demonstrate superior interreader agreement and complete correction for foot misplacement at the time of image acquisition using a 3D secondary measurement technique based on biplanar low dose radiographs.
* Image acquisition using biplanar low dose radiographs is associated with a substantial reduction (about 1/7) of radiation dose applied to the patient compared to standard radiographs.
* Therefore the question arises if these excellent ex vivo results can be confirmed in a prospective clinical study.

Objectives:

1. Evaluation of technical feasibility of 3D hindfoot alignment measurements based on biplanar radiographs.
2. Reproduction of superior interreader agreement of measurements based on biplanar radiographs compared to measurements on conventional radiographs.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Additional information to the brief summary:

Outcome(s): Hindfoot alignment measurement on standard radiographs and biplanar radiographs. The hindfoot angle is measured between the tibial axis and the calcaneal axis in degrees. Measurement results on plain films and based on 3D reconstructions will be compared.

Inclusion/Exclusion criteria:

* Inclusion: All patients referred for hindfoot alignment radiographs. These are all adults having suffered severe trauma or suffering from osteoarthrosis of the ankle joint. No inclusion of vulnerable participants.
* Exclusion criteria: Prior surgery, prior fracture, children and adolescents younger than the age of 20 years, known pregnancy.

Measurements and Procedures: Measurement of hindfoot alignment based on conventional radiographs and based on biplanar radiographs by two independent radiologists. Comparison of measurement results (paired-t-test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test) and calculation of interreader agreement (Intraclass correlation coefficient).

Study Product / Intervention: EOS low-dose biplanar x-ray scanner, EOS imaging, Paris, France One scan of the ankle joint to obtain an antero-posterior and lateral view.

Control Intervention: Conventional x-rays of the ankle joint (a.p., lateral, long axial or hindfoot alignment view) as referred from the clinician for treatment planning.

Number of Participants: 50 adults Based on a power analysis we think that this number of patients will enable reliable results. Because we do not know how big the differences between the measurements on standard radiographs and measurements on biplanar radiographs will be it is very difficult to perform a reasonable power analysis. In prior studies comparing torsion measurements on biplanar radiographs with CT measurements we were able to produce reliable results with the same number of patients.

Study Schedule:

First-Participant-In: June 2014 Last-Participant-Out: May 2015

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Congenital Medial Deviation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Biplanar Radiography

standard biplanar radiography of the foot

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

EOS low-dose biplanar radiography scanner

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients referred for hindfoot alignment radiographs. These are all adults having suffered severe trauma or suffering from osteoarthrosis of the ankle joint. No inclusion of vulnerable participants.

Exclusion Criteria

* Prior surgery, prior fracture, children and adolescents younger than the age of 20 years, known pregnancy.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Balgrist University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Florian M Buck, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Balgrist University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Radiology Department, Balgrist University Clinic

Zurich, Canton of Zurich, Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KEK-ZH-Nr. 2013-0459

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

SPLATT to Peroneus Brevis vs TATT to Lateral Cuneiform
NCT06300645 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA
Orthotic Dose Response Study
NCT02629731 COMPLETED NA