Rewarding Feedback in Motor Learning and Rehabilitation
NCT ID: NCT02189564
Last Updated: 2016-05-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
45 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-01-31
2016-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The investigators hypothesize improved motor skill learning and higher involvement of the dopaminsrgic system under rewarding vs. non-rewarding conditions.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Internet-based MOTOmed Exercise to Reduce Spasticity and Improve Physical Function in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis
NCT03548974
Implementation of a New Motor Skill Learning Therapeutic Device in Children With Cerebral Palsy Rehabilitation
NCT03930836
Sensory Perceptual Training on Activities of Daily Living and Hand Functions
NCT06554990
New Perspectives in the Rehabilitation of Children With Motor Disorders : the Role of the Mirror Neuron System
NCT01016496
Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy and Action Observation Training in Children With Unilateral Cerebral Palsy
NCT03256357
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
BASIC_SCIENCE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intrinsic reward
Feedback about good performance
Feedback about good performance
Intrinsic and extrinsic reward
Feedback about good performance + money
Feedback about good performance + money
Intrinsic reward (average performance)
Feedback about random selection of trials
Feedback about average performance
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Feedback about good performance
Feedback about good performance + money
Feedback about average performance
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* right handed
Exclusion Criteria
* pregnancy
20 Years
35 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Zurich
OTHER
Kai Lutz, PhD
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Kai Lutz, PhD
Scientific Director
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cereneo, Center For Rehabilitation and Neurology
Vitznau, Canton of Lucerne, Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Widmer M, Ziegler N, Held J, Luft A, Lutz K. Rewarding feedback promotes motor skill consolidation via striatal activity. Prog Brain Res. 2016;229:303-323. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2016.05.006. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
KFSP-SUB1-LU13054
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.