Internet Monitoring vs Medication to Control Blood Sugar in Type 2 Diabetes
NCT ID: NCT02185755
Last Updated: 2023-09-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-08-31
2016-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparing Internet Blood Glucose Monitoring System and Continuous Glucose Monitoring System
NCT01162694
Blood Monitoring and Data Acquisition and Utilization in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Insulin
NCT01175408
Effect of Internet Therapeutic Intervention on A1C Levels in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM) on Monotherapy
NCT01044368
3-Month Trial Observation of A1c Change
NCT01415271
Real-world Effects of Using Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Pharmacist-led Coaching on the Management of Type 2 Diabetes Among Adults Not Using Insulin (REAL isCGM T2D)
NCT06837103
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
To determine the effectiveness of an Internet-based glucose monitoring system (IBGMS) in the absence of medication changes.
2. Hypothesis:
IBGMS without medication changes is comparable to conventional medication at reducing HbA1c levels over 8% in patients with T2DM.
3. Justification:
Patients with T2DM having elevated HbA1c levels may be prescribed additional medications to help manage their blood sugar levels, which include oral hypoglycemic agents and/or insulin. As IBGMS has been shown to be effective in reducing HbA1c in T2DM, there is an opportunity to determine whether if this system could be used as an alternative to medication.
The benefits would include reduced side effects as a result of substituting for the effects of medication, as well as reduced financial costs associated with acquiring medication.
Considering that IBGMS increases the frequency at which patients receive feedback to change medications as compared to typical treatment, the risk is as typical for a patient opting for no medication changes for the same period of time.
4. Objectives: The primary end-point is to determine if patients using IBGMS have reduced HbA1c values at followup, and to compare the reduction to the control group on typical medications.
5. Research Method: 120 patients with T2DM satisfying the inclusion criteria will be recruited and have baseline HbA1c established through regular lab blood tests. They will be randomized into one of two groups, one that will be trained to use IBGMS and one control group going on an appropriate additional medication.
The IBGMS group will be asked to report their blood sugars to their endocrinologist biweekly and receive feedback for each report. No medication changes will be offered in the feedback, but lifestyle or dietary recommendations may be included.
The control group will be asked to take their new medications as indicated by their endocrinologist.
Both groups will have followup visits with their endocrinologist at 3 and 6 months, and will also have blood tests done at those time points checking their HbA1c levels.
The effectiveness of both interventions will be evaluated individually and against each other.
For the IBGMS group, a rescue secondary endpoint occurs if a subject maintains an HbA1c level at or greater than 8% after 3 months; the subject will be withdrawn from the study and put under standard care.
6. Statistical Analysis: The sample size was calculated to be 120 by estimating mean differences and standard deviations using data from previous studies. For the calculation the statistical power was 0.80 and alpha of 0.05.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Internet-Based Glucose Monitoring System
The subjects enrolled in the Internet Therapeutic Intervention arm receive standard care by testing their blood glucose at least 3 times daily and visit the endocrinologist every 3 months; however, they are also asked to upload their blood glucose readings online every 2 weeks for the health practitioner to view and provide feedback limited to non-medicine related comments and suggestions.
Internet-Based Glucose Monitoring System
Normal Medication Positive Control
The subjects will be prescribed a new medication as appropriate for normal therapy. This group will receive no biweekly feedback nor require to report online, but will see the endocrinologist every 3 months up to 6 months.
Normal Medication Positive Control
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Internet-Based Glucose Monitoring System
Normal Medication Positive Control
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* HbA1c \> 8%
* Willingness to test blood glucose levels a minimum of 3 times daily
* Willingness to be trained on using the Internet-Based Glucose Monitoring System
* Willingness to be randomized
* Trained in self-blood glucose monitoring
* Internet access on a computer
* No prior use or training on IBGMS
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients using medications known to influence control of diabetes (eg steroids systemic or inhaled)
* Liver disease (AST (aspartate aminotransferase) or ALT (alanine aminotransferase) levels \> 2.5 times the reference level)
* Renal insufficient with a serum creatinine level \> 200 μmol/L
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Endocrine Research Society
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
ERS Gap Student
Medical Director
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Hugh D Tildesley, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Providence Health Care, University of British Columbia
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Dr. Hugh Tildesley Inc.
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Nathan DM, Cleary PA, Backlund JY, Genuth SM, Lachin JM, Orchard TJ, Raskin P, Zinman B; Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC) Study Research Group. Intensive diabetes treatment and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2005 Dec 22;353(25):2643-53. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052187.
Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet. 1998 Sep 12;352(9131):837-53.
Hirsch IB, Bode BW, Childs BP, Close KL, Fisher WA, Gavin JR, Ginsberg BH, Raine CH, Verderese CA. Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose (SMBG) in insulin- and non-insulin-using adults with diabetes: consensus recommendations for improving SMBG accuracy, utilization, and research. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2008 Dec;10(6):419-39. doi: 10.1089/dia.2008.0104.
Austin MM, Haas L, Johnson T, Parkin CG, Parkin CL, Spollett G, Volpone MT. Self-monitoring of blood glucose: benefits and utilization. Diabetes Educ. 2006 Nov-Dec;32(6):835-6, 844-7. doi: 10.1177/0145721706295873. No abstract available.
Tildesley HD, Mazanderani AB, Ross SA. Effect of Internet therapeutic intervention on A1C levels in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with insulin. Diabetes Care. 2010 Aug;33(8):1738-40. doi: 10.2337/dc09-2256.
Cho JH, Chang SA, Kwon HS, Choi YH, Ko SH, Moon SD, Yoo SJ, Song KH, Son HS, Kim HS, Lee WC, Cha BY, Son HY, Yoon KH. Long-term effect of the Internet-based glucose monitoring system on HbA1c reduction and glucose stability: a 30-month follow-up study for diabetes management with a ubiquitous medical care system. Diabetes Care. 2006 Dec;29(12):2625-31. doi: 10.2337/dc05-2371.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IBGMS standalone
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.