The Use of Paravertebral Block for Cardiac Surgery

NCT ID: NCT02180893

Last Updated: 2016-03-15

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-01-31

Study Completion Date

2014-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Pain after robotic cardiac surgery is a known problem and is often difficult to manage. Paravertebral nerve blocks are a proven method of pain relief following thoracotomy. A paravertebral block has been shown to provide good pain relief with minimal side effects, however, paravertebral blocks for robotic surgery have not been well studied. Currently the investigators routinely perform PVB on this patient population (of 50 MV robotic cases done between January and October 2012, 36 received paravertebral blocks with no adverse events noted). The investigators believe this should be studied further and that paravertebral blocks will reduce the amount of additional pain medication patients require in the first 24 hours after surgery, decrease intubation time and improve PACU and hospital discharge times.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Pain after robotic cardiac surgery is a known problem and is often difficult to manage. Paravertebral nerve blocks are a proven method of pain relief following thoracotomy. A paravertebral block has been shown to provide good pain relief with minimal side effects, however, paravertebral blocks for robotic surgery have not been well studied. Currently we routinely perform PVB on this patient population (of 50 MV robotic cases done between January and October 2012, 36 received paravertebral blocks with no adverse events noted). We believe this should be studied further and that paravertebral blocks will reduce the amount of additional pain medication patients require in the first 24 hours after surgery, decrease intubation time and improve PACU and hospital discharge times.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Mitral Valve Insufficiency

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Paravertebral block

Patient receiving a PVB prior to robotic mitral valve surgery

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Paravertebral Block

Intervention Type OTHER

Paravertebral nerve block injection

No block

Patients who did not receive PVB

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo Comparator

Intervention Type OTHER

No block

Patients who did not receive PVB

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Paravertebral Block

Paravertebral nerve block injection

Intervention Type OTHER

Placebo Comparator

No block

Patients who did not receive PVB

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients over the age of 18 years of age undergoing robotic mitral valve surgery.
* have capacity to understand and sign consent form

Exclusion Criteria

* patients that are not candidates for paravertebral block as per ASRA guidelines (Horlocker, Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2010). In short, this includes patients taking specific anti platelet agents such as clopidigrel, anticoagulants such as heparin or low molecular weight heparin, or patients with an INR of greater than 1.5. -patients with a history of COPD or other respiratory diseases that would confound data on time to extubated will be excluded.
* Patients that with a diagnosis of chronic pain, or patients currently taking narcotics are excluded, as this would confound data on postoperative narcotic requirements.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

NYU Langone Health

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Peter J Neuburger, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

NYU

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

NYU Langone Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Suri RM, Antiel RM, Burkhart HM, Huebner M, Li Z, Eton DT, Topilsky T, Sarano ME, Schaff HV. Quality of life after early mitral valve repair using conventional and robotic approaches. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Mar;93(3):761-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.11.062.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22364970 (View on PubMed)

Lynch JJ, Mauermann WJ, Pulido JN, Rehfeldt KH, Torres NE. Use of paravertebral blockade to facilitate early extubation after minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2010 Mar;14(1):47-8. doi: 10.1177/1089253210363009.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20472625 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

S12-02774

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Pain Control Trial
NCT05906134 RECRUITING PHASE1/PHASE2
Cryo Nerve Block Trial
NCT06861387 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA