A Study to Look at Tapentadol Tablets in Children and Adolescents in Pain
NCT ID: NCT02151682
Last Updated: 2019-09-12
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2/PHASE3
73 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-04-29
2018-10-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pharmacokinetic, Efficacy and Safety Study of Tapentadol Oral Solution in Children With Postoperative Pain
NCT01729728
A Study to Look at Tapentadol Oral Solution in Children and Adolescents in Pain
NCT02081391
Pharmacokinetics and Safety Study of Tapentadol for Postsurgical Pain in Children and Adolescents
NCT01134536
Evaluation of Effectiveness and Tolerability of Tapentadol Hydrochloride in Subjects With Severe Chronic Low Back Pain Taking Either WHO Step I or Step II Analgesics or no Regular Analgesics
NCT00983385
Evaluation of Effectiveness and Tolerability of Tapentadol Hydrochloride in Subjects With Severe Chronic Low Back Pain Taking WHO Step III Analgesics But Showing a Lack of Tolerability
NCT00986258
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
If eligible and willing, participants from Part 1 could enter a 12 month follow-up period (Part 2). In Part 2 of this study, participants were either treated with tapentadol PR tablets or entered observations arms where they were not treated at all or with standard of care.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
There were 4 arms in Part 2: The investigators/participants decided if participants from Part 1 switched to or continued on tapentadol PR (tapentadol arm) or if they received no treatment/standard of care treatment if needed (2 direct observation arms following treatment in Part 1 and 1 observation arm after initial treatment with tapentadol in Part 2).
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Morphine prolonged-release (Part 1)
10 milligram (mg) or 30 mg tablets were taken orally twice daily. Starting doses varied from 10 to 40 mg morphine PR twice daily depending on participant's weight; if necessary, doses were gradually increased up to a maximum dose defined per weight group.
The highest dose defined for participants weighing 55 kg and more was 200 mg per day.
Morphine prolonged release
Tapentadol prolonged-release (Part 1)
25 mg or 100 mg tablets were taken orally twice daily. Starting doses varied from 25 to 100 mg tapentadol PR twice daily depending on participant's weight. If necessary, doses were gradually increased up to a maximum dose defined per weight group.
The highest dose defined for participants weighing 55 kg and more was 500 mg per day.
Tapentadol prolonged release
Tapentadol in Part 2 after Tapentadol or Morphine in Part 1
Participants on tapentadol PR in Part 1 of the study continued on the current dose of tapentadol PR in Part 2 and if necessary could modify their tapentadol PR dosage. Participants who were randomized to morphine PR in Part 1 of the study were rotated to tapentadol PR in Part 2 with 70 percent of their current morphine equivalent dose or lower. The dosage could be increased gradually up to approximately 4.5 mg/kg body weight tapentadol PR twice daily.
Tapentadol prolonged release
Observation Period after Tapentadol in Part 1
Participants who completed tapentadol PR in Part 1 of the study or discontinued tapentadol treatment early in Part 1 could continue directly in the observation period in Part 2 for up to 12 months (with standard-of-care treatment if needed).
No interventions assigned to this group
Observation Period after Morphine in Part 1
Participants who completed morphine PR treatment in Part 1 of the study or discontinued early from morphine treatment in Part 1 could continue directly in the observation period in Part 2 (with standard-of-care treatment if needed).
No interventions assigned to this group
Observation Period after Tapentadol in Part 2
Participants who completed tapentadol PR or morphine PR treatment in Part 1 of the study could enter the Observation Period for up to 12 months (with standard-of-care treatment if needed) after they had discontinued from tapentadol PR treatment in Part 2.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Tapentadol prolonged release
Morphine prolonged release
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Participants were eligible for the study at enrollment if all the following applied:
* Informed consent (if applicable assent) obtained.
* Male or female participant at least 6 years of age at the Enrollment Visit and less than 18 years of age on Day 14.
* Participant has an underlying long-term pain condition (e.g., cancer, chronic disease, planned or performed surgery) that is, according to the judgment of the investigator, expected to require a twice-daily prolonged release opioid treatment until at least the end of the 14-day Treatment Period.
* Participant can swallow tablets of appropriate size.
* Participant is able to participate in the study as planned and willing to comply with the requirements of the protocol including refraining from drinking beverages containing alcohol and recreational intake of drugs while on study medication.
Participants had to satisfy the following criteria before allocation to treatment:
* Less than 18 years of age.
* No opioid intake or last calculated morphine equivalent dose of less than 3.5 mg/kg per day.
* Participant has a body weight of at least 17.5 kg.
* If a female of childbearing potential (post menarchal and not surgically incapable of childbearing) and sexually active, must practice an effective method of birth control (e.g., prescription oral contraceptives, contraceptive injections, intrauterine device, double barrier method, contraceptive patch) before allocation to study medication until the end of intake of study medication.
* If a female and post menarchal or older than 12 years, has a negative urine pregnancy test on the day before or on the day of allocation to study medication.
Part 2
* Participant has completed the 14-day Treatment Period.
* Participant is still in need of prolonged release opioid treatment.
* Participant does not meet any of the compulsory discontinuation criteria.
Exclusion Criteria
The following was checked at enrollment:
* Has been previously enrolled in this study or a previous study with tapentadol.
* Has a clinically relevant history of hypersensitivity, allergy, or contraindication to morphine or tapentadol or any ingredient, including galactose intolerance (see investigator's brochure for tapentadol prolonged-release \[PR\] and summary of product characteristics for morphine PR), or naloxone.
* History or current condition of any one of the following:
* Seizure disorder or epilepsy.
* Serotonin syndrome.
* Traumatic or hypoxic brain injury, brain contusion, stroke, transient ischemic attack, intracranial hematoma, posttraumatic amnesia, brain neoplasm, or episode(s) of more than 24 hours duration of unconsciousness.
* History or current condition of any one of the following:
* Moderate to severe renal or hepatic impairment.
* Abnormal pulmonary function or clinically relevant respiratory disease (e.g., acute or severe bronchial asthma, hypercapnia)
* Complex regional pain syndrome.
* A pain indication with a strong psycho-somatic component that, in the judgment of the investigator, is unlikely to respond to opioids.
* History of alcohol or drug abuse in the investigator's judgment, based on history and physical examination. Drugs of abuse detected in urine screen unless explained by allowed concomitant medication
* Participant has:
* A clinically relevant abnormal electrocardiogram.
* Signs of pre-excitation syndrome.
* Brugada's syndrome.
* QT or corrected QT (QTcF, Fridericia) interval greater than 470 ms.
* Any surgery scheduled during the first 14 days of the study that is expected to require post-surgical intensive care unit (ICU) treatment, or that requires post-surgical parenteral pain-treatment, or may, affect the safety of the participant.
* Participant is not able to understand and comply with the protocol as appropriate for the age of the participant or participant is cognitively impaired in the investigator's judgment such that they cannot comply with the protocol.
* Participant, parent or the legal representative is an employee of the investigator or study site, with direct involvement in the proposed study or other studies under the direction of that investigator or study site, or family member of the employees or the investigator.
The following was checked at the enrollment and the allocation visits:
* Has a concomitant disease or disorder (e.g., endocrine, metabolic, neurological, psychiatric, infection) that in the opinion of the investigator may affect or compromise participant safety during the study participation.
* Pancreatic/biliary tract disease (e.g., pancreatitis) or paralytic ileus.
* Intake of forbidden concomitant medication/use of forbidden therapies (see synopsis section Concomitant medications/therapies).
* Female participant is breastfeeding a child.
The following was checked at the allocation to treatment visit:
* Has received a drug or used a medical device not approved for human use within 30 days prior to visit.
* Based on data from the local laboratory, one or more of:
* Total serum bilirubin greater than 2.0 mg/dL.
* Serum albumin less than 2.8 g/dL.
* Aspartate transaminase or alanine transaminase greater than 5 times upper limit of normal.
* Based on data from the local laboratory, creatinine clearance less than 30 mL/min per 1.73 m2 (calculated according to a formula that is appropriate for the respective age group).
6 Years
17 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Grünenthal GmbH
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Director Clinical Trials
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Grünenthal GmbH
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
BE001
Leuven, , Belgium
BG005
Pleven, , Bulgaria
BG004
Plovdiv, , Bulgaria
BG001
Sofia, , Bulgaria
BG006
Sofia, , Bulgaria
CL004
Santiago, , Chile
CL001
Valparaíso, , Chile
FR008
Amiens, , France
FR004
Brest, , France
FR002
Lille, , France
FR006
Lyon, , France
FR005
Nice, , France
FR001
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, , France
FR003
Villejuif, , France
DE001
Homburg, , Germany
HU001
Budapest, , Hungary
IT003
Turin, , Italy
PT001
Braga, , Portugal
PT002
Porto, , Portugal
ES003
Valladolid, , Spain
GB005
Leeds, , United Kingdom
GB003
Manchester, , United Kingdom
GB006
Sheffield, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2012-004360-22
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
U1111-1154-4572
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
KF5503-66
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.