Evaluation of Effectiveness and Tolerability of Tapentadol Hydrochloride in Subjects With Severe Chronic Low Back Pain Taking WHO Step III Analgesics But Showing a Lack of Tolerability

NCT ID: NCT00986258

Last Updated: 2019-01-09

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

136 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-10-30

Study Completion Date

2011-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The main objective of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of tapentadol hydrochloride prolonged release in subjects suffering from severe chronic low back pain (LBP) who are taking WHO Step III analgesics and show lack of tolerability. This is a clinical effectiveness trial designed to establish a link between anticipated clinical outcomes and the clinical practice by means of selected measures of clinical and subject-reported outcome.

The trial will compare the effectiveness of previous analgesic treatment (WHO Step III) with that of tapentadol hydrochloride prolonged release treatment during defined periods of evaluation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain Chronic Pain Low Back Pain Neuropathic Pain Nociceptive Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Tapentadol Prolonged Release

Other Names:

* Nucynta
* Palexia

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tapentadol Prolonged Release

Intervention Type DRUG

Participants started with 50 mg, 100 mg or 150 mg tapentadol prolonged release (PR) twice daily. Opioid rotation to tapentadol was scheduled as follows:

* if less than 100 mg morphine equivalent start with 50 mg tapentadol PR;
* if on 101 to 160 mg morphine equivalent daily dose start with 100 mg tapentadol PR;
* if above 161 mg morphine equivalent daily dose start with 150 mg tapentadol PR.

Tapentadol doses were adjusted to a level that provided adequate analgesia (upwards or downwards on a weekly basis). After 5 weeks, the doses of tapentadol PR were kept stable (start of Maintenance phase). The tapentadol PR formulation was administered for up to 12 weeks. Tapentadol immediate release 50 mg (no more than twice daily; at least 4 hours apart) was considered as medication for acute pain episodes however, participants were not permitted to dose tapentadol immediate release any more when a daily dose of 500 mg tapentadol PR was reached.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Tapentadol Prolonged Release

Participants started with 50 mg, 100 mg or 150 mg tapentadol prolonged release (PR) twice daily. Opioid rotation to tapentadol was scheduled as follows:

* if less than 100 mg morphine equivalent start with 50 mg tapentadol PR;
* if on 101 to 160 mg morphine equivalent daily dose start with 100 mg tapentadol PR;
* if above 161 mg morphine equivalent daily dose start with 150 mg tapentadol PR.

Tapentadol doses were adjusted to a level that provided adequate analgesia (upwards or downwards on a weekly basis). After 5 weeks, the doses of tapentadol PR were kept stable (start of Maintenance phase). The tapentadol PR formulation was administered for up to 12 weeks. Tapentadol immediate release 50 mg (no more than twice daily; at least 4 hours apart) was considered as medication for acute pain episodes however, participants were not permitted to dose tapentadol immediate release any more when a daily dose of 500 mg tapentadol PR was reached.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

- Nucynta - Palexia

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Participants must have signed an Informed Consent Form indicating that they understand the purpose of and procedures required for the trial and are willing to participate in it.
* Participants are men or non-pregnant, non-lactating women. Sexually active women must be postmenopausal, surgically sterile, or practicing an effective method of birth control (e.g., prescription oral contraceptives, contraceptive injections, intrauterine device, double barrier method, contraceptive patch, male partner sterilization) before entry and throughout the trial. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test at screening.
* Participants must be appropriately communicative to verbalize and to differentiate with regard to location and intensity of the pain.
* Participants must be at least 18 years of age.
* Participants must have a diagnosis of chronic low back pain; chronic pain defined as pain lasting for at least 3 months
* If the Participant has radicular pain, this must have been present for at least 3 months and stable for the 4 weeks before enrollment.
* Participant's pain must require a strong analgesic (defined as WHO Step III) as judged by the Investigator.
* Participants must be taking a WHO Step III analgesic on a daily basis for at least 3 months prior to the Screening Visit.
* Participants must have responded to the WHO Step III analgesic, i.e., participants must have a confirmed average pain intensity score (NRS 3) of ≤5 points during the last 3 days prior to the Screening Visit.
* Participants must report opioid-related side effects as the reason to change their analgesic.
* Participants must report a rate of satisfaction with their previous analgesic regimen not exceeding "fair" on a subject satisfaction with treatment scale (5-point VRS).

Exclusion Criteria

* Presence of a clinically significant disease or laboratory findings that in the Investigator's opinion may affect efficacy or safety assessments.
* Presence of active systemic or local infection that may, in the opinion of the Investigator, affect the efficacy, quality of life/function or safety assessments.
* History of alcohol or drug abuse, or suspicion of in Investigator's judgement.
* Presence of concomitant autoimmune inflammatory conditions.
* Known history of or laboratory values reflecting severe renal impairment.
* Known history of moderately or severely impaired hepatic function.
* History of or active hepatitis B or C within the past 3 months or history of HIV infection.
* History of seizure disorder or epilepsy.
* Any of the following within 1 year: mild/moderate traumatic brain injury, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or brain neoplasm. Severe traumatic brain injury within 15 years (consisting of 1 or more of the following: brain contusion, intracranial hematoma, either unconsciousness or post traumatic amnesia lasting more than 24 h) or residual sequelae suggesting transient changes in consciousness.
* Pregnant or breast-feeding.
* History of allergy to, or hypersensitivity to tapentadol hydrochloride or its excipients, or contraindications related to tapentadol hydrochloride including:
* Subjects with acute or severe bronchial asthma or hypercapnia.
* Subjects who have or are suspected of having paralytic ileus.
* Employees of the Investigator or trial site, with direct involvement in this trial or other trials under the direction of the Investigator or trial site, as well as family members of employees of the Investigator.
* Participation in another trial concurrently or within 4 weeks prior to the Screening Visit.
* Known to or suspected of not being able to comply with the protocol and the use of the investigational medicinal product.
* Use of monoamine oxidase inhibitors within 14 days before the Screening Visit.
* Non-stable dosing of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors within 30 days before the Screening Visit (the doses must remain stable during the trial).
* Presence of concomitant painful condition other than low back pain that could confound the subject's trial assessments or self evaluation of pain, e.g., anatomical deformities, significant skin conditions such as abscess or syndromes with widespread pain such as fibromyalgia.
* Any painful procedures during the trial (e.g., major surgery) that may, in the opinion of the Investigator, affect the efficacy or safety assessments.
* Pending litigation due to chronic pain or disability.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Grünenthal GmbH

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michael Schäfer, Prof. MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Charité University Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

BE004

Bruges, , Belgium

Site Status

BE003

Charleroi, , Belgium

Site Status

BE002

Edegem, , Belgium

Site Status

BE001

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

CZ001

Brno, , Czechia

Site Status

FR004

Thionville, , France

Site Status

FR001

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

DE005

Albstadt, , Germany

Site Status

DE001

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

DE003

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

DE006

Kiel, , Germany

Site Status

DE004

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

DE008

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

DE007

Stuttgart, , Germany

Site Status

NL002

Alkmaar, , Netherlands

Site Status

NL004

Doetinchem, , Netherlands

Site Status

NL003

Eindhoven, , Netherlands

Site Status

NL001

Tiel, , Netherlands

Site Status

PL002

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

PL001

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

ES006

Cadiz, , Spain

Site Status

ES001

Granada, , Spain

Site Status

ES003

Málaga, , Spain

Site Status

ES004

Seville, , Spain

Site Status

ES005

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

CH001

Basel, , Switzerland

Site Status

CH002

Sankt Gallen, , Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium Czechia France Germany Netherlands Poland Spain Switzerland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Galvez R, Schafer M, Hans G, Falke D, Steigerwald I. Tapentadol prolonged release versus strong opioids for severe, chronic low back pain: results of an open-label, phase 3b study. Adv Ther. 2013 Mar;30(3):229-59. doi: 10.1007/s12325-013-0015-6. Epub 2013 Mar 7.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23475406 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2009-010428-25

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

KF5503/45

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

835093

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

A Study of Pain Relief in Low Back Pain
NCT00325949 COMPLETED PHASE3
Phase 2 Chronic Low Back Pain Study
NCT01364922 COMPLETED PHASE2