Evaluation of Effectiveness and Tolerability of Tapentadol Hydrochloride in Subjects With Severe Chronic Low Back Pain Taking WHO Step III Analgesics But Showing a Lack of Tolerability
NCT ID: NCT00986258
Last Updated: 2019-01-09
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE3
136 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-10-30
2011-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The trial will compare the effectiveness of previous analgesic treatment (WHO Step III) with that of tapentadol hydrochloride prolonged release treatment during defined periods of evaluation.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Effectiveness and Tolerability of Tapentadol Hydrochloride in Subjects With Severe Chronic Low Back Pain Taking Either WHO Step I or Step II Analgesics or no Regular Analgesics
NCT00983385
Evaluation of Effectiveness and Tolerability of Tapentadol Hydrochloride in Subjects With Severe Pain Due to Osteoarthritis Taking WHO Step III Analgesics But Showing a Lack of Tolerability.
NCT00982280
Comparison of Increasing Doses of Tapentadol Versus a Combination of Tapentadol and Pregabalin
NCT01352741
Evaluation of Effectiveness and Tolerability of Tapentadol Hydrochloride in Subjects With Severe Pain Due to Osteoarthritis Taking Either WHO Step I or Step II Analgesics or no Regular Analgesic
NCT00983073
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of Tapentadol (CG5503) Extended Release (ER) in Patients With Moderate to Severe Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT00449176
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Tapentadol Prolonged Release
Other Names:
* Nucynta
* Palexia
Tapentadol Prolonged Release
Participants started with 50 mg, 100 mg or 150 mg tapentadol prolonged release (PR) twice daily. Opioid rotation to tapentadol was scheduled as follows:
* if less than 100 mg morphine equivalent start with 50 mg tapentadol PR;
* if on 101 to 160 mg morphine equivalent daily dose start with 100 mg tapentadol PR;
* if above 161 mg morphine equivalent daily dose start with 150 mg tapentadol PR.
Tapentadol doses were adjusted to a level that provided adequate analgesia (upwards or downwards on a weekly basis). After 5 weeks, the doses of tapentadol PR were kept stable (start of Maintenance phase). The tapentadol PR formulation was administered for up to 12 weeks. Tapentadol immediate release 50 mg (no more than twice daily; at least 4 hours apart) was considered as medication for acute pain episodes however, participants were not permitted to dose tapentadol immediate release any more when a daily dose of 500 mg tapentadol PR was reached.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Tapentadol Prolonged Release
Participants started with 50 mg, 100 mg or 150 mg tapentadol prolonged release (PR) twice daily. Opioid rotation to tapentadol was scheduled as follows:
* if less than 100 mg morphine equivalent start with 50 mg tapentadol PR;
* if on 101 to 160 mg morphine equivalent daily dose start with 100 mg tapentadol PR;
* if above 161 mg morphine equivalent daily dose start with 150 mg tapentadol PR.
Tapentadol doses were adjusted to a level that provided adequate analgesia (upwards or downwards on a weekly basis). After 5 weeks, the doses of tapentadol PR were kept stable (start of Maintenance phase). The tapentadol PR formulation was administered for up to 12 weeks. Tapentadol immediate release 50 mg (no more than twice daily; at least 4 hours apart) was considered as medication for acute pain episodes however, participants were not permitted to dose tapentadol immediate release any more when a daily dose of 500 mg tapentadol PR was reached.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Participants are men or non-pregnant, non-lactating women. Sexually active women must be postmenopausal, surgically sterile, or practicing an effective method of birth control (e.g., prescription oral contraceptives, contraceptive injections, intrauterine device, double barrier method, contraceptive patch, male partner sterilization) before entry and throughout the trial. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test at screening.
* Participants must be appropriately communicative to verbalize and to differentiate with regard to location and intensity of the pain.
* Participants must be at least 18 years of age.
* Participants must have a diagnosis of chronic low back pain; chronic pain defined as pain lasting for at least 3 months
* If the Participant has radicular pain, this must have been present for at least 3 months and stable for the 4 weeks before enrollment.
* Participant's pain must require a strong analgesic (defined as WHO Step III) as judged by the Investigator.
* Participants must be taking a WHO Step III analgesic on a daily basis for at least 3 months prior to the Screening Visit.
* Participants must have responded to the WHO Step III analgesic, i.e., participants must have a confirmed average pain intensity score (NRS 3) of ≤5 points during the last 3 days prior to the Screening Visit.
* Participants must report opioid-related side effects as the reason to change their analgesic.
* Participants must report a rate of satisfaction with their previous analgesic regimen not exceeding "fair" on a subject satisfaction with treatment scale (5-point VRS).
Exclusion Criteria
* Presence of active systemic or local infection that may, in the opinion of the Investigator, affect the efficacy, quality of life/function or safety assessments.
* History of alcohol or drug abuse, or suspicion of in Investigator's judgement.
* Presence of concomitant autoimmune inflammatory conditions.
* Known history of or laboratory values reflecting severe renal impairment.
* Known history of moderately or severely impaired hepatic function.
* History of or active hepatitis B or C within the past 3 months or history of HIV infection.
* History of seizure disorder or epilepsy.
* Any of the following within 1 year: mild/moderate traumatic brain injury, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or brain neoplasm. Severe traumatic brain injury within 15 years (consisting of 1 or more of the following: brain contusion, intracranial hematoma, either unconsciousness or post traumatic amnesia lasting more than 24 h) or residual sequelae suggesting transient changes in consciousness.
* Pregnant or breast-feeding.
* History of allergy to, or hypersensitivity to tapentadol hydrochloride or its excipients, or contraindications related to tapentadol hydrochloride including:
* Subjects with acute or severe bronchial asthma or hypercapnia.
* Subjects who have or are suspected of having paralytic ileus.
* Employees of the Investigator or trial site, with direct involvement in this trial or other trials under the direction of the Investigator or trial site, as well as family members of employees of the Investigator.
* Participation in another trial concurrently or within 4 weeks prior to the Screening Visit.
* Known to or suspected of not being able to comply with the protocol and the use of the investigational medicinal product.
* Use of monoamine oxidase inhibitors within 14 days before the Screening Visit.
* Non-stable dosing of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors within 30 days before the Screening Visit (the doses must remain stable during the trial).
* Presence of concomitant painful condition other than low back pain that could confound the subject's trial assessments or self evaluation of pain, e.g., anatomical deformities, significant skin conditions such as abscess or syndromes with widespread pain such as fibromyalgia.
* Any painful procedures during the trial (e.g., major surgery) that may, in the opinion of the Investigator, affect the efficacy or safety assessments.
* Pending litigation due to chronic pain or disability.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Grünenthal GmbH
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael Schäfer, Prof. MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Charité University Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
BE004
Bruges, , Belgium
BE003
Charleroi, , Belgium
BE002
Edegem, , Belgium
BE001
Liège, , Belgium
CZ001
Brno, , Czechia
FR004
Thionville, , France
FR001
Toulouse, , France
DE005
Albstadt, , Germany
DE001
Berlin, , Germany
DE003
Berlin, , Germany
DE006
Kiel, , Germany
DE004
Leipzig, , Germany
DE008
Leipzig, , Germany
DE007
Stuttgart, , Germany
NL002
Alkmaar, , Netherlands
NL004
Doetinchem, , Netherlands
NL003
Eindhoven, , Netherlands
NL001
Tiel, , Netherlands
PL002
Krakow, , Poland
PL001
Poznan, , Poland
ES006
Cadiz, , Spain
ES001
Granada, , Spain
ES003
Málaga, , Spain
ES004
Seville, , Spain
ES005
Valencia, , Spain
CH001
Basel, , Switzerland
CH002
Sankt Gallen, , Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Galvez R, Schafer M, Hans G, Falke D, Steigerwald I. Tapentadol prolonged release versus strong opioids for severe, chronic low back pain: results of an open-label, phase 3b study. Adv Ther. 2013 Mar;30(3):229-59. doi: 10.1007/s12325-013-0015-6. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2009-010428-25
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
KF5503/45
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
835093
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.