Evaluation of Effectiveness and Tolerability of Tapentadol Hydrochloride in Subjects With Severe Chronic Low Back Pain Taking Either WHO Step I or Step II Analgesics or no Regular Analgesics
NCT ID: NCT00983385
Last Updated: 2019-01-15
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
208 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-09-30
2010-07-06
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The trial will compare the effectiveness of previous analgesic treatment (either WHO Step I or Step II analgesics or no regular analgesics) with that of tapentadol hydrochloride prolonged release (PR) treatment during defined periods of evaluation.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Effectiveness and Tolerability of Tapentadol Hydrochloride in Subjects With Severe Chronic Low Back Pain Taking WHO Step III Analgesics But Showing a Lack of Tolerability
NCT00986258
Evaluation of Effectiveness and Tolerability of Tapentadol Hydrochloride in Subjects With Severe Pain Due to Osteoarthritis Taking Either WHO Step I or Step II Analgesics or no Regular Analgesic
NCT00983073
Comparison of Increasing Doses of Tapentadol Versus a Combination of Tapentadol and Pregabalin
NCT01352741
Tapentadol Prolonged Release (PR) Versus Oxycodone/Naloxone Prolonged Release in Severe Chronic Low Back Pain With a Neuropathic Component.
NCT01838616
Evaluation of Effectiveness and Tolerability of Tapentadol Hydrochloride in Subjects With Severe Pain Due to Osteoarthritis Taking WHO Step III Analgesics But Showing a Lack of Tolerability.
NCT00982280
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Tapentadol
Tapentadol PR was given orally twice a day. A maximum of 2 oral Tapentadol immediate release (IR) tablets per day, with a minimum of a 4 hour interval between doses, were taken if there were acute pain episodes. The total daily dose of Tapentadol PR and IR were not permitted to exceed 500 mg per day.
Tapentadol PR
Tapentadol Prolonged Release (PR) Titration and Optimal Dose Period: Starting at 50 mg Tapentadol PR twice daily, adjusted with 50 mg PR steps (upwards or downwards) as necessary to achieve a balance between pain relief and a satisfactory level of tolerability. Participants were not permitted to exceed a dose of 500 mg of Tapentadol per day.
Observation period
Eligibility assessment period to characterize the baseline over a one week period (week -1). Participants continued their previous treatment prior to allocation to tapentadol, if eligible.
Tapentadol PR
Maintenance Period: In this period participants continued Tapentadol Prolonged Release (PR) on the dose established in the Titration and Optimal Dose Period. Tapentadol IR participants were not permitted to exceed a total daily tapentadol dose of 500 mg.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Tapentadol PR
Tapentadol Prolonged Release (PR) Titration and Optimal Dose Period: Starting at 50 mg Tapentadol PR twice daily, adjusted with 50 mg PR steps (upwards or downwards) as necessary to achieve a balance between pain relief and a satisfactory level of tolerability. Participants were not permitted to exceed a dose of 500 mg of Tapentadol per day.
Observation period
Eligibility assessment period to characterize the baseline over a one week period (week -1). Participants continued their previous treatment prior to allocation to tapentadol, if eligible.
Tapentadol PR
Maintenance Period: In this period participants continued Tapentadol Prolonged Release (PR) on the dose established in the Titration and Optimal Dose Period. Tapentadol IR participants were not permitted to exceed a total daily tapentadol dose of 500 mg.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Participants were men or non-pregnant, non-lactating women. Female participants must be postmenopausal, surgically sterile, or practicing an effective method of birth control. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test at screening.
* Participants must be appropriately communicative to verbalize and to differentiate with regard to location and intensity of the pain.
* Participants must be at least 18 years of age.
* Participants must have a diagnosis of chronic low back pain; chronic pain defined as pain lasting for at least 3 months.
* If the participant has radicular pain, this must have been present for at least 3 months and stable for the 4 weeks before enrollment.
* Participants's pain must require a strong analgesic (defined as WHO Step III) as judged by the Investigator.
* Participants must report a rate of satisfaction with their previous analgesic regimen not exceeding "fair" on a subject satisfaction with treatment scale (5-point VRS).
* If under regular, daily pretreatment:
* Participants must be taking a WHO Step I or Step II analgesic medication on a daily basis for at least 2 weeks prior to the Screening Visit.
* The Investigator considers dose increase of WHO Step I analgesics (as mono- or combination therapy) and/or continuation with or dose increase of WHO Step II analgesics inadequate for the individual participant, whatever applicable.
* Participants must have an average pain intensity score (NRS 3) greater than 5 points during the last 3 days prior to the Screening Visit. or
* If no regular analgesic pretreatment is reported:
* Participants must have an average pain intensity score (NRS-3) greater than 6 points in the last 3 days prior to the Screening Visit and related to low back pain.
Exclusion Criteria
* Presence of active systemic or local infection that may, in the opinion of the Investigator, affect the efficacy, quality of life/function or safety assessments.
* History of alcohol or drug abuse, or suspicion of in Investigator's judgement.
* Presence of concomitant autoimmune inflammatory conditions.
* Known history of or laboratory values reflecting severe renal impairment.
* Known history of moderately or severely impaired hepatic function.
* History of or active hepatitis B or C within the past 3 months or history of HIV infection
* History of seizure disorder or epilepsy.
* Any of the following within 1 year: mild/moderate traumatic brain injury, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or brain neoplasm. Severe traumatic brain injury within 15 years (consisting of 1 or more of the following: brain contusion, intracranial hematoma, either unconsciousness or post-traumatic amnesia lasting more than 24 h) or residual sequelae suggesting transient changes in consciousness.
* Pregnant or breast-feeding.
* History of allergy to, or hypersensitivity to tapentadol hydrochloride or its excipients, or contraindications related to tapentadol hydrochloride including:
* Participants with acute or severe bronchial asthma or hypercapnia.
* Participants who have or are suspected of having paralytic ileus.
* Employees of the Investigator or trial site, with direct involvement in this trial or other trials under the direction of the Investigator or trial site, as well as family members of employees of the Investigator.
* Participation in another trial concurrently or within 4 weeks prior to the Screening Visit.
* Known to or suspected of not being able to comply with the protocol and the use of the investigational medicinal product.
* Use of monoamine oxidase inhibitors within 14 days before the Screening Visit.
* Non-stable dosing of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors within 30 days before the Screening Visit (the doses must remain stable during the trial).
* Presence of conditions other than low back pain that could confound the assessment or self evaluation of pain, e.g., anatomical deformities, significant skin conditions such as abscess or syndromes with widespread pain such as fibromyalgia.
* Any concomitant painful condition that could interfere with the subject's trial assessments or with their ability to differentiate low back pain from other painful conditions.
* Any painful procedures during the trial (e.g., major surgery) that may, in the opinion of the Investigator, affect the efficacy or safety assessments.
* Pending litigation due to chronic pain or disability.
* Intake of Step III analgesics within the 30 days prior to the Screening Visit.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Grünenthal GmbH
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Hans Kress, Prof. MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Medical University / AKH Vienna
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Site 5
Graz, , Austria
Site 1
Vienna, , Austria
Site 2
Vienna, , Austria
Site 3
Vienna, , Austria
Site 4
Vienna, , Austria
Site 3
Karlovac, , Croatia
Site 2
Opatija, , Croatia
Site 1
Sisak, , Croatia
Site 2
Châteaugiron, , France
Site 4
La Seyne-sur-Mer, , France
Site 3
Murs Erigné, , France
Site 1
Paris, , France
Site 3
Berlin, , Germany
Site 7
Böblingen, , Germany
Site 4
Celle, , Germany
Site 1
Dresden, , Germany
Site 6
Hanover, , Germany
Site 8
Leipzig, , Germany
Site 5
Lünen, , Germany
Site 2
Wiesbaden, , Germany
Site 6
Bologna, , Italy
Site 5
Catania, , Italy
Site 2
Genova, , Italy
Site 4
Parma, , Italy
Site 3
Pavia, , Italy
Site 1
Rome, , Italy
Site 1
Lublin, , Poland
Site 4
Tychy, , Poland
Site 3
Wroclaw, , Poland
Site 5
Alicante, , Spain
Site 1
Badalona, , Spain
Site 7
Guadalajara, , Spain
Site 6
Madrid, , Spain
Site 4
Oviedo, , Spain
Site 8
Pamplona, , Spain
Site 3
Valencia, , Spain
Site 1
Morges, , Switzerland
Site 2
Valens, , Switzerland
Site 7
Belfast, , United Kingdom
Site 2
Bristol, , United Kingdom
Site 8
Chelmsford, , United Kingdom
Site 6
Edinburgh, , United Kingdom
Site 1
Glasgow, , United Kingdom
Site 4
London, , United Kingdom
Site 5
London, , United Kingdom
Site 3
Plymouth, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Steigerwald I, Muller M, Davies A, Samper D, Sabatowski R, Baron R, Rozenberg S, Szczepanska-Szerej A, Gatti A, Kress HG. Effectiveness and safety of tapentadol prolonged release for severe, chronic low back pain with or without a neuropathic pain component: results of an open-label, phase 3b study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Jun;28(6):911-36. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2012.679254. Epub 2012 May 9.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2009-010427-12
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
KF5503/44
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
787579
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.