Evaluation of Effectiveness and Tolerability of Tapentadol Hydrochloride in Subjects With Severe Chronic Low Back Pain Taking Either WHO Step I or Step II Analgesics or no Regular Analgesics

NCT ID: NCT00983385

Last Updated: 2019-01-15

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

208 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-09-30

Study Completion Date

2010-07-06

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The main objective of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of tapentadol hydrochloride prolonged release in subjects suffering from severe chronic low back pain (LBP) who are taking either WHO Step I or Step II analgesics or no regular analgesics. This is a clinical effectiveness trial designed to establish a link between anticipated clinical outcomes and the clinical practice by means of selected measures of clinical and subject-reported outcome.

The trial will compare the effectiveness of previous analgesic treatment (either WHO Step I or Step II analgesics or no regular analgesics) with that of tapentadol hydrochloride prolonged release (PR) treatment during defined periods of evaluation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Pain Low Back Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Tapentadol

Tapentadol PR was given orally twice a day. A maximum of 2 oral Tapentadol immediate release (IR) tablets per day, with a minimum of a 4 hour interval between doses, were taken if there were acute pain episodes. The total daily dose of Tapentadol PR and IR were not permitted to exceed 500 mg per day.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tapentadol PR

Intervention Type DRUG

Tapentadol Prolonged Release (PR) Titration and Optimal Dose Period: Starting at 50 mg Tapentadol PR twice daily, adjusted with 50 mg PR steps (upwards or downwards) as necessary to achieve a balance between pain relief and a satisfactory level of tolerability. Participants were not permitted to exceed a dose of 500 mg of Tapentadol per day.

Observation period

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility assessment period to characterize the baseline over a one week period (week -1). Participants continued their previous treatment prior to allocation to tapentadol, if eligible.

Tapentadol PR

Intervention Type DRUG

Maintenance Period: In this period participants continued Tapentadol Prolonged Release (PR) on the dose established in the Titration and Optimal Dose Period. Tapentadol IR participants were not permitted to exceed a total daily tapentadol dose of 500 mg.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Tapentadol PR

Tapentadol Prolonged Release (PR) Titration and Optimal Dose Period: Starting at 50 mg Tapentadol PR twice daily, adjusted with 50 mg PR steps (upwards or downwards) as necessary to achieve a balance between pain relief and a satisfactory level of tolerability. Participants were not permitted to exceed a dose of 500 mg of Tapentadol per day.

Intervention Type DRUG

Observation period

Eligibility assessment period to characterize the baseline over a one week period (week -1). Participants continued their previous treatment prior to allocation to tapentadol, if eligible.

Intervention Type OTHER

Tapentadol PR

Maintenance Period: In this period participants continued Tapentadol Prolonged Release (PR) on the dose established in the Titration and Optimal Dose Period. Tapentadol IR participants were not permitted to exceed a total daily tapentadol dose of 500 mg.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Palexia® Nucynta® Palexia® Nucynta®

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Participants must have signed an Informed Consent Form.
* Participants were men or non-pregnant, non-lactating women. Female participants must be postmenopausal, surgically sterile, or practicing an effective method of birth control. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test at screening.
* Participants must be appropriately communicative to verbalize and to differentiate with regard to location and intensity of the pain.
* Participants must be at least 18 years of age.
* Participants must have a diagnosis of chronic low back pain; chronic pain defined as pain lasting for at least 3 months.
* If the participant has radicular pain, this must have been present for at least 3 months and stable for the 4 weeks before enrollment.
* Participants's pain must require a strong analgesic (defined as WHO Step III) as judged by the Investigator.
* Participants must report a rate of satisfaction with their previous analgesic regimen not exceeding "fair" on a subject satisfaction with treatment scale (5-point VRS).
* If under regular, daily pretreatment:

* Participants must be taking a WHO Step I or Step II analgesic medication on a daily basis for at least 2 weeks prior to the Screening Visit.
* The Investigator considers dose increase of WHO Step I analgesics (as mono- or combination therapy) and/or continuation with or dose increase of WHO Step II analgesics inadequate for the individual participant, whatever applicable.
* Participants must have an average pain intensity score (NRS 3) greater than 5 points during the last 3 days prior to the Screening Visit. or
* If no regular analgesic pretreatment is reported:

* Participants must have an average pain intensity score (NRS-3) greater than 6 points in the last 3 days prior to the Screening Visit and related to low back pain.

Exclusion Criteria

* Presence of a clinically significant disease or laboratory findings that in the Investigator's opinion may affect efficacy or safety assessments.
* Presence of active systemic or local infection that may, in the opinion of the Investigator, affect the efficacy, quality of life/function or safety assessments.
* History of alcohol or drug abuse, or suspicion of in Investigator's judgement.
* Presence of concomitant autoimmune inflammatory conditions.
* Known history of or laboratory values reflecting severe renal impairment.
* Known history of moderately or severely impaired hepatic function.
* History of or active hepatitis B or C within the past 3 months or history of HIV infection
* History of seizure disorder or epilepsy.
* Any of the following within 1 year: mild/moderate traumatic brain injury, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or brain neoplasm. Severe traumatic brain injury within 15 years (consisting of 1 or more of the following: brain contusion, intracranial hematoma, either unconsciousness or post-traumatic amnesia lasting more than 24 h) or residual sequelae suggesting transient changes in consciousness.
* Pregnant or breast-feeding.
* History of allergy to, or hypersensitivity to tapentadol hydrochloride or its excipients, or contraindications related to tapentadol hydrochloride including:
* Participants with acute or severe bronchial asthma or hypercapnia.
* Participants who have or are suspected of having paralytic ileus.
* Employees of the Investigator or trial site, with direct involvement in this trial or other trials under the direction of the Investigator or trial site, as well as family members of employees of the Investigator.
* Participation in another trial concurrently or within 4 weeks prior to the Screening Visit.
* Known to or suspected of not being able to comply with the protocol and the use of the investigational medicinal product.
* Use of monoamine oxidase inhibitors within 14 days before the Screening Visit.
* Non-stable dosing of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors within 30 days before the Screening Visit (the doses must remain stable during the trial).
* Presence of conditions other than low back pain that could confound the assessment or self evaluation of pain, e.g., anatomical deformities, significant skin conditions such as abscess or syndromes with widespread pain such as fibromyalgia.
* Any concomitant painful condition that could interfere with the subject's trial assessments or with their ability to differentiate low back pain from other painful conditions.
* Any painful procedures during the trial (e.g., major surgery) that may, in the opinion of the Investigator, affect the efficacy or safety assessments.
* Pending litigation due to chronic pain or disability.
* Intake of Step III analgesics within the 30 days prior to the Screening Visit.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Grünenthal GmbH

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hans Kress, Prof. MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Medical University / AKH Vienna

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Site 5

Graz, , Austria

Site Status

Site 1

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Site 2

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Site 3

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Site 4

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Site 3

Karlovac, , Croatia

Site Status

Site 2

Opatija, , Croatia

Site Status

Site 1

Sisak, , Croatia

Site Status

Site 2

Châteaugiron, , France

Site Status

Site 4

La Seyne-sur-Mer, , France

Site Status

Site 3

Murs Erigné, , France

Site Status

Site 1

Paris, , France

Site Status

Site 3

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Site 7

Böblingen, , Germany

Site Status

Site 4

Celle, , Germany

Site Status

Site 1

Dresden, , Germany

Site Status

Site 6

Hanover, , Germany

Site Status

Site 8

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

Site 5

Lünen, , Germany

Site Status

Site 2

Wiesbaden, , Germany

Site Status

Site 6

Bologna, , Italy

Site Status

Site 5

Catania, , Italy

Site Status

Site 2

Genova, , Italy

Site Status

Site 4

Parma, , Italy

Site Status

Site 3

Pavia, , Italy

Site Status

Site 1

Rome, , Italy

Site Status

Site 1

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Site 4

Tychy, , Poland

Site Status

Site 3

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Site 5

Alicante, , Spain

Site Status

Site 1

Badalona, , Spain

Site Status

Site 7

Guadalajara, , Spain

Site Status

Site 6

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Site 4

Oviedo, , Spain

Site Status

Site 8

Pamplona, , Spain

Site Status

Site 3

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Site 1

Morges, , Switzerland

Site Status

Site 2

Valens, , Switzerland

Site Status

Site 7

Belfast, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Site 2

Bristol, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Site 8

Chelmsford, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Site 6

Edinburgh, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Site 1

Glasgow, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Site 4

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Site 5

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Site 3

Plymouth, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Austria Croatia France Germany Italy Poland Spain Switzerland United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Steigerwald I, Muller M, Davies A, Samper D, Sabatowski R, Baron R, Rozenberg S, Szczepanska-Szerej A, Gatti A, Kress HG. Effectiveness and safety of tapentadol prolonged release for severe, chronic low back pain with or without a neuropathic pain component: results of an open-label, phase 3b study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Jun;28(6):911-36. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2012.679254. Epub 2012 May 9.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22443293 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2009-010427-12

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

KF5503/44

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

787579

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Tapentadol (CG5503)
NCT00421928 COMPLETED PHASE3