Pediatric Continuity Care Intensivist

NCT ID: NCT02146573

Last Updated: 2020-09-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

276 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-05-31

Study Completion Date

2018-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will implement and evaluate the effects of a pediatric continuity care intensivist program. This study will determine the impact of an additional pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) intensivist on outcomes at the patient and family level. It will also evaluate the training program to prepare the continuity care intensivist (CCI).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This randomized controlled trial will implement and evaluate the effects of a pediatric continuity care intensivist (CCI) program. The study will evaluate how effective the modified communication training for providers is to perform this new role. The primary outcome for the study is whether a CCI will affect several patient level outcomes for patients who have been admitted to the PICU longer than 7 days. Patient length of stay, hospital acquired conditions, time to limitations of interventions and new medical technology will be assessed comparing the intervention and usual care arms. The study will also determine the impact of the CCI program on parent/family satisfaction with provider communication and decision-making for their child.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Critical Illness

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

CCI Provider for Parent-patient dyad

Parents and patients are randomly assigned to a Continuity Care Intensivist (CCI) Provider who has received specialized communication training. The parent-patient dyad will receive standardized care from the CCI throughout their time in the PICU in addition to being assigned a rotating physician of record.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Continuity Care Intensivist Communication Training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Physicians enrolled in the intervention arm will complete a two to three part communication training. Survey measures of communication competency and burnout will be administered at baseline, after training, and at the end of the study. After the communication training, physicians will undergo an OSCE assessment with a simulated patient to evaluate communication skills. At the end of the study, CCI providers will receive surveys that assess the experience and challenges of the role, repeat surveys assessing competency with communication and frequency of engaging families in goals of care conversations, in addition to a follow-up focus group that will assess their experience with the intervention, the time required and the potential tradeoffs in other duties required by them to participate as a CCI.

Continuity Care Intensivist (CCI) Provider Program

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

After undergoing CCI training, CCI providers will fulfill a standardized role with parent-patient dyads:

* CCI will meet with families on a regular basis and at change of physician of record throughout their entire PICU hospitalization.
* Help patients/families navigate decisions in concert with preferences and beliefs
* Help patients/families and other care providers look at "bigger picture"; trajectory of illness, goals, and hopes for the patient.
* Serve as point person for active intensivists on service and other specialists
* Help resolve conflict when multiple providers have different opinions on course of action

Usual Care for Parent-patient dyad

Patients and parents randomly assigned to usual care in the PICU which includes the rotation of the physician of record approximately every 7 days. There is no standardized process by which patients may be assigned a primary attending who would follow them throughout their stay. In the usual care arm it may never happen that they are assigned a primary intensivist, regardless of the length of their hospitalization.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Continuity Care Intensivist Communication Training

Physicians enrolled in the intervention arm will complete a two to three part communication training. Survey measures of communication competency and burnout will be administered at baseline, after training, and at the end of the study. After the communication training, physicians will undergo an OSCE assessment with a simulated patient to evaluate communication skills. At the end of the study, CCI providers will receive surveys that assess the experience and challenges of the role, repeat surveys assessing competency with communication and frequency of engaging families in goals of care conversations, in addition to a follow-up focus group that will assess their experience with the intervention, the time required and the potential tradeoffs in other duties required by them to participate as a CCI.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Continuity Care Intensivist (CCI) Provider Program

After undergoing CCI training, CCI providers will fulfill a standardized role with parent-patient dyads:

* CCI will meet with families on a regular basis and at change of physician of record throughout their entire PICU hospitalization.
* Help patients/families navigate decisions in concert with preferences and beliefs
* Help patients/families and other care providers look at "bigger picture"; trajectory of illness, goals, and hopes for the patient.
* Serve as point person for active intensivists on service and other specialists
* Help resolve conflict when multiple providers have different opinions on course of action

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

CCI Communication Training CCI Provider

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

CCI Provider

1\. Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Attending Physician who volunteers to serve in the role of CCI.

Usual Care (UC) Provider

1\. Any Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Attending Physician who is not enrolled as a CCI.

Parent-Patient Dyads

1. Parent/guardian of a child who has been admitted to the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) PICU for ≥7 days after onset of the study
2. Parent/guardian ≥ 18 years old
3. Parent/guardian is English-speaking
4. Child \<18 years old at time of enrollment
5. Child has been admitted to the PICU at CHOP for ≥7 days
6. Medical team believed that patient will remain in the PICU for at least another seven days

Exclusion Criteria

CCI Provider

1\. Any medical care provider who is not an attending physician (e.g., Pediatric critical care residents, nurses, and fellows)

UC Provider

1. Any medical care provider who is not an attending physician (e.g., Pediatric critical care residents, nurses, and fellows)
2. Attending physician who is enrolled in the study as a CCI

Parent-Patient Dyads

1. Parent or guardian who has previously participated in the CCI study in a previous hospitalization (in either usual care or intervention arm)
2. Parent or guardian of a child who has already been hospitalized in the PICU \>7 days at the onset of the study.
3. Child ≥18 years of age at time of enrollment
4. Child has previously participated in the CCI study in a previous PICU stay (in either usual care or intervention arm)
5. Child has been hospitalized in the PICU \>7 days at the onset of the study
6. Child already has a "primary" attending
7. Child has a sibling that has already been enrolled in the study. This child will be ineligible for the study but will be assigned to the same care as the child who is or was enrolled in the study.
8. If contact was not established for enrollment by 14 days after admission, then the patient was no longer considered eligible for enrollment to maintain comparability of length of stay at enrollment.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jennifer K Walter, MD, PhD, MS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Board R, Ryan-Wenger N. Long-term effects of pediatric intensive care unit hospitalization on families with young children. Heart Lung. 2002 Jan-Feb;31(1):53-66. doi: 10.1067/mhl.2002.121246.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11805751 (View on PubMed)

Balluffi A, Kassam-Adams N, Kazak A, Tucker M, Dominguez T, Helfaer M. Traumatic stress in parents of children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2004 Nov;5(6):547-53. doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000137354.19807.44.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15530191 (View on PubMed)

Needle JS, O'Riordan M, Smith PG. Parental anxiety and medical comprehension within 24 hrs of a child's admission to the pediatric intensive care unit*. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2009 Nov;10(6):668-74; quiz 674. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181a706c9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19451843 (View on PubMed)

Pochard F, Darmon M, Fassier T, Bollaert PE, Cheval C, Coloigner M, Merouani A, Moulront S, Pigne E, Pingat J, Zahar JR, Schlemmer B, Azoulay E; French FAMIREA study group. Symptoms of anxiety and depression in family members of intensive care unit patients before discharge or death. A prospective multicenter study. J Crit Care. 2005 Mar;20(1):90-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2004.11.004.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16015522 (View on PubMed)

Fauman KR, Pituch KJ, Han YY, Niedner MF, Reske J, LeVine AM. Predictors of depressive symptoms in parents of chronically ill children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2011 Dec;28(8):556-63. doi: 10.1177/1049909111403465. Epub 2011 Mar 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21454321 (View on PubMed)

Nuss SL, Hinds PS, LaFond DA. Collaborative clinical research on end-of-life care in pediatric oncology. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2005 May;21(2):125-34; discussion 134-44. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2004.12.011.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15991662 (View on PubMed)

Diaz-Caneja A, Gledhill J, Weaver T, Nadel S, Garralda E. A child's admission to hospital: a qualitative study examining the experiences of parents. Intensive Care Med. 2005 Sep;31(9):1248-54. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2728-8. Epub 2005 Jul 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16021417 (View on PubMed)

Colville G, Darkins J, Hesketh J, Bennett V, Alcock J, Noyes J. The impact on parents of a child's admission to intensive care: integration of qualitative findings from a cross-sectional study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2009 Apr;25(2):72-9. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2008.10.002. Epub 2008 Nov 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19019677 (View on PubMed)

Back AL, Arnold RM, Baile WF, Fryer-Edwards KA, Alexander SC, Barley GE, Gooley TA, Tulsky JA. Efficacy of communication skills training for giving bad news and discussing transitions to palliative care. Arch Intern Med. 2007 Mar 12;167(5):453-60. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.5.453.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17353492 (View on PubMed)

Davidson JE, Powers K, Hedayat KM, Tieszen M, Kon AA, Shepard E, Spuhler V, Todres ID, Levy M, Barr J, Ghandi R, Hirsch G, Armstrong D; American College of Critical Care Medicine Task Force 2004-2005, Society of Critical Care Medicine. Clinical practice guidelines for support of the family in the patient-centered intensive care unit: American College of Critical Care Medicine Task Force 2004-2005. Crit Care Med. 2007 Feb;35(2):605-22. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000254067.14607.EB.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17205007 (View on PubMed)

Namachivayam P, Shann F, Shekerdemian L, Taylor A, van Sloten I, Delzoppo C, Daffey C, Butt W. Three decades of pediatric intensive care: Who was admitted, what happened in intensive care, and what happened afterward. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2010 Sep;11(5):549-55. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181ce7427.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20124947 (View on PubMed)

Feudtner C, Christakis DA, Connell FA. Pediatric deaths attributable to complex chronic conditions: a population-based study of Washington State, 1980-1997. Pediatrics. 2000 Jul;106(1 Pt 2):205-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10888693 (View on PubMed)

Azoulay E, Pochard F, Chevret S, Lemaire F, Mokhtari M, Le Gall JR, Dhainaut JF, Schlemmer B; French FAMIREA Group. Meeting the needs of intensive care unit patient families: a multicenter study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Jan;163(1):135-9. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.163.1.2005117.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11208638 (View on PubMed)

Johnson D, Wilson M, Cavanaugh B, Bryden C, Gudmundson D, Moodley O. Measuring the ability to meet family needs in an intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 1998 Feb;26(2):266-71. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199802000-00023.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9468163 (View on PubMed)

Curtis JR, Ciechanowski PS, Downey L, Gold J, Nielsen EL, Shannon SE, Treece PD, Young JP, Engelberg RA. Development and evaluation of an interprofessional communication intervention to improve family outcomes in the ICU. Contemp Clin Trials. 2012 Nov;33(6):1245-54. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.06.010. Epub 2012 Jul 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22772089 (View on PubMed)

Schneiderman LJ. Ethics consultation in the intensive care unit. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2005 Dec;11(6):600-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ccx.0000179933.54508.7a.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16292067 (View on PubMed)

Schneiderman LJ. Effect of ethics consultations in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2006 Nov;34(11 Suppl):S359-63. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000237078.54456.33.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17057599 (View on PubMed)

Schneiderman LJ, Gilmer T, Teetzel HD. Impact of ethics consultations in the intensive care setting: a randomized, controlled trial. Crit Care Med. 2000 Dec;28(12):3920-4. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200012000-00033.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11153636 (View on PubMed)

Schneiderman LJ, Gilmer T, Teetzel HD, Dugan DO, Blustein J, Cranford R, Briggs KB, Komatsu GI, Goodman-Crews P, Cohn F, Young EW. Effect of ethics consultations on nonbeneficial life-sustaining treatments in the intensive care setting: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003 Sep 3;290(9):1166-72. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.9.1166.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12952998 (View on PubMed)

Gilmer T, Schneiderman LJ, Teetzel H, Blustein J, Briggs K, Cohn F, Cranford R, Dugan D, Kamatsu G, Young E. The costs of nonbeneficial treatment in the intensive care setting. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Jul-Aug;24(4):961-71. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.4.961.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16136635 (View on PubMed)

Temel JS, Greer JA, Admane S, Gallagher ER, Jackson VA, Lynch TJ, Lennes IT, Dahlin CM, Pirl WF. Longitudinal perceptions of prognosis and goals of therapy in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a randomized study of early palliative care. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jun 10;29(17):2319-26. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.32.4459. Epub 2011 May 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21555700 (View on PubMed)

Contro N, Larson J, Scofield S, Sourkes B, Cohen H. Family perspectives on the quality of pediatric palliative care. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002 Jan;156(1):14-9. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.156.1.14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11772185 (View on PubMed)

Leach MJ. Rapport: a key to treatment success. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2005 Nov;11(4):262-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2005.05.005. Epub 2005 Jun 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16290897 (View on PubMed)

Kimberlin C, Brushwood D, Allen W, Radson E, Wilson D. Cancer patient and caregiver experiences: communication and pain management issues. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2004 Dec;28(6):566-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2004.03.005.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15589081 (View on PubMed)

DeLemos D, Chen M, Romer A, Brydon K, Kastner K, Anthony B, Hoehn KS. Building trust through communication in the intensive care unit: HICCC. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2010 May;11(3):378-84. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181b8088b.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19770787 (View on PubMed)

Meert KL, Eggly S, Pollack M, Anand KJ, Zimmerman J, Carcillo J, Newth CJ, Dean JM, Willson DF, Nicholson C; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network. Parents' perspectives on physician-parent communication near the time of a child's death in the pediatric intensive care unit. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2008 Jan;9(1):2-7. doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000298644.13882.88.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18477906 (View on PubMed)

Heyland DK, Rocker GM, Dodek PM, Kutsogiannis DJ, Konopad E, Cook DJ, Peters S, Tranmer JE, O'Callaghan CJ. Family satisfaction with care in the intensive care unit: results of a multiple center study. Crit Care Med. 2002 Jul;30(7):1413-8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200207000-00002.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12130954 (View on PubMed)

Mack JW, Wolfe J, Cook EF, Grier HE, Cleary PD, Weeks JC. Hope and prognostic disclosure. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Dec 10;25(35):5636-42. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.6110.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18065734 (View on PubMed)

Epstein D, Unger JB, Ornelas B, Chang JC, Markovitz BP, Moromisato DY, Dodek PM, Heyland DK, Gold JI. Psychometric evaluation of a modified version of the family satisfaction in the ICU survey in parents/caregivers of critically ill children*. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013 Oct;14(8):e350-6. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3182917705.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23863815 (View on PubMed)

Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 6880820 (View on PubMed)

Pyke-Grimm KA, Degner L, Small A, Mueller B. Preferences for participation in treatment decision making and information needs of parents of children with cancer: a pilot study. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 1999 Jan;16(1):13-24. doi: 10.1177/104345429901600103.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9989013 (View on PubMed)

Cegala DJ, Coleman MT, Turner JW. The development and partial assessment of the medical communication competence scale. Health Commun. 1998;10(3):261-88. doi: 10.1207/s15327027hc1003_5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16370986 (View on PubMed)

Snyder CR, Harris C, Anderson JR, Holleran SA, Irving LM, Sigmon ST, Yoshinobu L, Gibb J, Langelle C, Harney P. The will and the ways: development and validation of an individual-differences measure of hope. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991 Apr;60(4):570-85. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.60.4.570.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2037968 (View on PubMed)

Makoul G, Krupat E, Chang CH. Measuring patient views of physician communication skills: development and testing of the Communication Assessment Tool. Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Aug;67(3):333-42. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.05.005. Epub 2007 Jun 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17574367 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB 14-010987

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Oxy-PICU Neurodevelopmental Follow-up Study
NCT06734715 NOT_YET_RECRUITING
PICU Patient Diary
NCT03777527 UNKNOWN
LongVentKids Study
NCT04112459 UNKNOWN