Clinical Evaluation, Organic Response in Obesity Patients Subjected to Vertical Videolaparoscopy Gastroplasty With or Without Perioperative Cares Recommended by the Acerto Project. Randomized Study.

NCT ID: NCT02113995

Last Updated: 2014-04-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-04-30

Study Completion Date

2012-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background To evaluate clinical results, insulin resistance and inflammatory response to trauma in morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic Sleeve gastrectomy who received either traditional preoperative care or treatment following the ACERTO protocol.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Methods The population of the study consisted of morbidly obese patients, who were operated on with the Sleeve procedure, from Cuiaba, MT, between April and October 2012. We studied the inflammatory response and insulin resistance by measuring levels of glucose, insulin, Homa IR, reactive C protein, albumin, pre-albumin, alpha 1 acid glicoprotein, interleukin 6 and glycosylated hemoglobin. We also studied hydration, nausea and vomiting, hypertension, and length of hospital stay.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

To Evaluate Clinical Results, Insulin Resistance and Inflammatory Response to Trauma in Morbidly Obese Patients

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ACERTO

Patients received 400 ml of a beverage containing water and 50 g of maltodextrin 6 hours before the operation. They received orally extra 200 ml of this beverage containing water and 25 g of maltodextrin 3 hours before the operation. Regarding the intravenous fluids, they received 1 to 1.5 liter of crystalloid fluids (ringer lactate) in the intraoperative. In the immediate postoperative they were programmed to receive 2 liters of crystalloid fluids (ringer lactate) and 1 to 2 liters in the first day of the postoperative period. The venous hydration was suspended as soon as they started to drink liquids.

Prophylaxis of nausea and vomiting with dexamethasone 8 mg at the beginning of the anesthesia and ondansetron 4-8 mg after the surgery. In the postoperative period we utilized analgesics such as dipyrone and ketorolac and, if necessary, low doses of morphine and antiemetics like ondansetron.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

ACERTO protocol vs Traditional care

Intervention Type OTHER

Three sample blood collections were performed, being one in the anesthesic induction and the others in the next 24 to 48 hours. The blood was sent to the laboratory for dosages of glucose, insulin, C-reactive protein, albumin, prealbumin, alpha 1 acid glycoprotein and interleukin 6. During the anesthesic induction we also collected blood for analize glycosylated hemoglobin.

Traditional care

The analgesia in the postoperative period of the group control was performed with dipyrone, tramadol hydrochloride, and morphine. The prophylaxis of nausea and vomiting with dexamethasone 8 mg in the beginning of the anesthesia and the metoclopramide at the end of the surgery. During the anesthetic induction antibiotic prophylaxis (cefazolin 3 grams/day for 2 days) was administrated.

The control group were submitted to the protocol of traditional fasting with at least 8 hours. Patients in this group received 1 to 2 liters of crystalloid fluid (ringer lactate) in the intraoperative, and they received 3 to 4 liters of crystalloid fluids (ringer lactate, saline 0.9% and/or dextrose 5%). In the immediate postoperative, 2 to 3 liters in the first day of postoperative and, finally, 1 to 2 liters in the second day of the postoperative.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

ACERTO protocol vs Traditional care

Intervention Type OTHER

Three sample blood collections were performed, being one in the anesthesic induction and the others in the next 24 to 48 hours. The blood was sent to the laboratory for dosages of glucose, insulin, C-reactive protein, albumin, prealbumin, alpha 1 acid glycoprotein and interleukin 6. During the anesthesic induction we also collected blood for analize glycosylated hemoglobin.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ACERTO protocol vs Traditional care

Three sample blood collections were performed, being one in the anesthesic induction and the others in the next 24 to 48 hours. The blood was sent to the laboratory for dosages of glucose, insulin, C-reactive protein, albumin, prealbumin, alpha 1 acid glycoprotein and interleukin 6. During the anesthesic induction we also collected blood for analize glycosylated hemoglobin.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\-

Exclusion Criteria

\-
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cuiaba University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Gunther Peres Pimenta

MD PhD Gunther Peres Pimenta

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gunther P Pimenta, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Cuiaba University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

ACERTO protocol

Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

018/CEP-UNIC/2011.

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.