Endoscopic Argon Plasma Coagulation Vs. Control For Weight Regain After Gastric Surgery

NCT ID: NCT03055754

Last Updated: 2019-05-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

42 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-05-31

Study Completion Date

2019-04-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Bariatric surgery procedures have consistently been demonstrated to reduce long-term co-morbidities and mortality. Despite its benefits, weight regain is common, usually initiating around two years after the initial procedure, the underlying mechanism often being an enlargement of the anastomosis diameter for the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Although a reduction in the anastomosis diameter has been reported in association with endoscopic argon plasma coagulation, to our knowledge this therapy has not been formally tested in a randomized controlled trial. the objective of this study is to conduct a randomized, parallel controlled trial comparing endoscopic argon plasma coagulation to reduce the enlargement of the anastomosis diameter for the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus control with an initial diagnostic endoscopic followed by observation. The investigators hypothesize that the argon coagulation arm will achieve greater weight reduction, with a low incidence of adverse events.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This will be a parallel randomized controlled trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio, comparing endoscopic argon plasma coagulation to reduce the enlargement of the anastomosis diameter for the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus control with an initial diagnostic endoscopic followed by observation. The study is designed and reported in accordance with the CONSORT statement for parallel randomized trials. Eventual changes made to the design after trial commencement will be fully reported, including changes in eligibility criteria throughout the study.

Ethical aspects: The study will undergo full review by the local Institutional Review Board, all potential participants being provided with informed consent. Study protocol will only be initiated after consent is signed.

Participants: Inclusion criteria will involve all consecutive patients who have previously undergone a bariatric procedure and who now present with symptoms of weight regain, difficulty maintaining weight, and lack of satiety after meals. The investigator will not exclude any patients meeting these criteria. No other treatments will be provided. A total of 40 participants will be part of this analysis, or 20 per randomization arm.

Setting: Data will be collected at the Kaiser Clinic in São José do Rio Preto, Brazil. Participant accrual will start in April of 2016, with the end of follow-up occurring around the end of 2017.

Interventions: Interventions for the argon randomized arm will include an endoscopic procedure with a full inventory, measurement of the anastomosis diameter, and an argon plasma coagulation. The control arm will only undergo a full inventory and measurement of the anastomosis diameter, without any intervention. Participants allocated to the observational arm and presenting with continued symptoms of weight regain, difficulty maintaining weight, and lack of satiety after meals will not be prevented from undergoing an argon intervention, although our analyses will still analyze their results within the observation arm, thus observing an intention to treat protocol.

Outcomes: Primary outcomes of interested will be weight regain, gastrointestinal symptoms, and satiety verbal analog scale. Secondary outcome measures will include fasting glucose concentration, HbA1c concentration, body weight, body mass index, waist circumference, arterial blood pressure, plasma total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol and triglycerides, quality of life, surgical complications, and diabetes-related complications.

Sample size: The sample size is estimated to be 40 participants total, or 20 in each randomization arm.

Randomization: The random sequence will be generated using the statistical language R by a researcher not involved with subject allocation. The randomization schedule has a blocking size of an undisclosed size, with no stratification. Randomization will be implemented by an administrative assistant using sealed, sequentially numbered envelopes. Researchers will be specifically instructed not to attempt to break the randomization schedule in any manner. Subject allocation will be performed by the principal investigator (GQ) soon after consent and prior to the endoscopic procedure. Given the nature of this intervention, the only individual blinded regarding randomization will be the data analyst. Blinding will be ensured by having codes in the final dataset.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Obesity Weight Gain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Argon randomized arm

Endoscopic procedure with a full inventory, measurement of the anastomosis diameter, and an argon plasma coagulation. Followup of all patients by a multidisciplinary team (life, food orientations).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Argon randomized arm

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Endoscopic argon plasma coagulation

Control arm

Full inventory and measurement of the anastomosis diameter, without any intervention. Followup of all patients by a multidisciplinary team (life, food orientations).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Control arm

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

No Endoscopic procedure

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Argon randomized arm

Endoscopic argon plasma coagulation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Control arm

No Endoscopic procedure

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* all consecutive patients who have previously undergone a bariatric procedure
* who present with symptoms of weight regain, difficulty maintaining weight, and lack of satiety after meals.

Exclusion Criteria

\-
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

76 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Kaiser Clinic and Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Luiz G de Quadros, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Kaiser Clinic and Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Kaiser Clinic and Day Hospital

São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D; CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 May;115(5):1063-1070. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181d9d421. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20410783 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KaiserCH

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.