Insulation Failure in St. Jude Riata Leads

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-07-31

Study Completion Date

2019-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A recent study evaluated the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database, which contains reports of adverse events involving medical devices6,9. The FDA updates the database every two months. A total of 107 Riata leads with reported inside-out insulation breaks were found, of which 105 were available for analysis. The average age of the leads was 62.1+/-18.6 months. A total of 226 insulation defects were found with 143 inside-out insulation abrasions. Twenty-eight of the 105 leads (26.7%) had inside-out insulation defects underneath one or more of the high voltage-shocking coil. Of these, 23 were 8F and five were 7F Riata ST leads. Exposed cables or conductors were present in 32 leads and six leads had melted cables, presumably due to one or more high voltage shocks. 22 of the 43 leads assessed (51.2%) also had abraded ETFE cable coating exposing the conductor. Noise and other sensing issues were the most common signs of failure. Seven leads were found to have externalized cables and five exhibited electrical abnormalities. 31 patients (29.5%) experienced inappropriate shocks of which 41% had abraded cables.

A critical decision facing physicians is how to screen and manage patients who are found to have externalized cables. Externalized cables on fluoroscopy may precede any electrical abnormalities. Also noise may not be detected on all ICD models. A recent case report suggested that changes in lead parameters might be transient and may be missed. The lead may function normally as the high-voltage and pace-sense cables are covered with ETFE, which serves as the second insulating barrier. As this is a very thin layer (0.0015 inches) the reliability of this to withstand a high-energy shock is unknown. This may lead to failure of appropriate therapy for life threatening arrhythmias.

The aim of this study is to screen patients with ICD leads that potentially could have multiple different failure mechanisms, including inside-out insulation breaks, to develop a novel new algorithm and methods to detect these defects, thereby enabling physicians to prevent complications from failure of these leads.

It is hypothesized that current monitoring tools are insufficient for detecting the sometimes transient electrical failures of the Riata family of leads, and that additional device diagnostic information in combination with fluoroscopy may improve detection of electrical failures.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Failure of Chronically Implanted Defibrillator Leads -Incidence and Management

NCT00614718

Death, Sudden, Cardiac Ventricular Fibrillation

COMPLETED

Lead Extract Study

NCT01169441

Cardiac Surgical Procedures

COMPLETED

Shock Testing to Unmask RV Lead and GEnerator Malfunction in ICD Patients: the SURGE-ICD Registry

NCT04858672

Implantable Defibrillator Lead Dysfunction Implantable Automatic Defibrillator Malfunction Implantable Defibrillator User

UNKNOWN

Pediatric Lead Extractability and Survival Evaluation (PLEASE)

NCT00335036

Ventricular Tachycardia Ventricular Fibrillation Cardiomyopathy +2 more

TERMINATED NA

S-ICD Electrode Registry

NCT05713708

ICD Malfunction Sudden Cardiac Death

UNKNOWN

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A recent study evaluated the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database, which contains reports of adverse events involving medical devices6,9. The FDA updates the database every two months. A total of 107 Riata leads with reported inside-out insulation breaks were found, of which 105 were available for analysis. The average age of the leads was 62.1+/-18.6 months. A total of 226 insulation defects were found with 143 inside-out insulation abrasions. Twenty-eight of the 105 leads (26.7%) had inside-out insulation defects underneath one or more of the high voltage-shocking coil. Of these, 23 were 8F and five were 7F Riata ST leads. Exposed cables or conductors were present in 32 leads and six leads had melted cables, presumably due to one or more high voltage shocks. 22 of the 43 leads assessed (51.2%) also had abraded ETFE cable coating exposing the conductor. Noise and other sensing issues were the most common signs of failure. Seven leads were found to have externalized cables and five exhibited electrical abnormalities. 31 patients (29.5%) experienced inappropriate shocks of which 41% had abraded cables.

A critical decision facing physicians is how to screen and manage patients who are found to have externalized cables. Externalized cables on fluoroscopy may precede any electrical abnormalities. Also noise may not be detected on all ICD models. A recent case report suggested that changes in lead parameters might be transient and may be missed. The lead may function normally as the high-voltage and pace-sense cables are covered with ETFE, which serves as the second insulating barrier. As this is a very thin layer (0.0015 inches) the reliability of this to withstand a high-energy shock is unknown. This may lead to failure of appropriate therapy for life threatening arrhythmias.

The aim of this study is to screen patients with ICD leads that potentially could have multiple different failure mechanisms, including inside-out insulation breaks, to develop a novel new algorithm and methods to detect these defects, thereby enabling physicians to prevent complications from failure of these leads.

It is hypothesized that current monitoring tools are insufficient for detecting the sometimes transient electrical failures of the Riata family of leads, and that additional device diagnostic information in combination with fluoroscopy may improve detection of electrical failures.

This will be a prospective, single-center study. Patients who consent to participate will be enrolled for up to three years.

This study offers the potential of direct benefit to the patient and indirect benefit for future users of the ICD systems. This study may identify inside-out insulation breaks and prevent impending lead failure. Additionally, analyses of the data collected as part of this study may help to develop an "electronic footprint" or pattern to remotely identify inside-out insulation breaks in all ICD leads Potential risks include exposure to radiation from a fluoroscopic exam of the lead and receiving a synchronized ICD shock.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Implanted With Any Currently (and Any Future) FDA-approved Medtronic ICD or CRT Device to Which is Attached a St. Jude Riata Lead

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

participants

all subjects meeting inclusion and none of exclusion criteria

Group Type OTHER

fluoroscopy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Fluoroscopic evaluation of three different views (left anterior oblique, right anterior oblique and anterior/posterior) and magnification will be performed to check for externalized cables at 15 frames per second using the best visualized angle per screening electrophysiologist.

synchronized high-voltage shock

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

If fluoroscopic evaluation shows externalized conductors or if patient is deemed high-risk, the patient will be consented for synchronized high voltage shock through his/her device. This will be done in the non-invasive electrophysiology lab with conscious sedation as is done during defibrillation threshold testing.

For patients undergoing a generator (ICD) change as part of standard of care, performance of synchronized, high-voltage shock will be performed at the discretion of the electrophysiologist.

Holter monitor

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Participants will be given a 24-hour Holter monitor at baseline and once annually, and will be followed at least every three months throughout the study. Participants who are found to have an electrical abnormality at any point during the study may be given a 24-hour Holter monitor if it is believed that this procedure will provide clinically useful information regarding the integrity of the lead.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

fluoroscopy

Fluoroscopic evaluation of three different views (left anterior oblique, right anterior oblique and anterior/posterior) and magnification will be performed to check for externalized cables at 15 frames per second using the best visualized angle per screening electrophysiologist.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

synchronized high-voltage shock

If fluoroscopic evaluation shows externalized conductors or if patient is deemed high-risk, the patient will be consented for synchronized high voltage shock through his/her device. This will be done in the non-invasive electrophysiology lab with conscious sedation as is done during defibrillation threshold testing.

For patients undergoing a generator (ICD) change as part of standard of care, performance of synchronized, high-voltage shock will be performed at the discretion of the electrophysiologist.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Holter monitor

Participants will be given a 24-hour Holter monitor at baseline and once annually, and will be followed at least every three months throughout the study. Participants who are found to have an electrical abnormality at any point during the study may be given a 24-hour Holter monitor if it is believed that this procedure will provide clinically useful information regarding the integrity of the lead.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male or female
* Age ≥18
* Implanted with any Medtronic Protecta® VR/DR/CRT, XT-VR/DR/CRT, Secura®, Virtuoso®, Maximo II®, Concerto® VR, Evera® or Viva® (and any future FDA-approved Medtronic ICD) device to which is attached a St. Jude Riata lead (Models 1560, 1561, 1562, 1570, 1571, 1572, 1580, 1581, 1582, 1590, 1591, 1592, 7000, 7001, 7002, 7010, 7011, 7040, 7041, 7042)
* Willing and able to sign informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Age \<18
* ICD that does not use a Riata lead
* Riata lead not connected to Medtronic Protecta® VR/DR/CRT, XT-VR/DR/CRT, Maximo II® Secura®, Virtuoso®, Concerto® VR, Evera® or Viva® (and any future FDA-approved Medtronic ICD) device
* Unwilling or unable to sign informed consent

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No