TACE Study-Liver Embolization Perfusion (VGH Radiology LIU)
NCT ID: NCT02093104
Last Updated: 2017-05-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
40 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2014-02-28
2016-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Can Quantitative MRI After cTACE Help Predict Survival ?
NCT02173119
Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Evaluation of Liver Functional Status and Treatment Efficacy in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Locoregional Therapy
NCT01281683
Accuracy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Post TACE
NCT04569799
Follow up After TACE by Elastography and Color Doppler.
NCT06070623
Efficacy of TACE With Endoscopic Therapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT05017922
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The major difference between C-arm CT systems and clinical CT systems is the difference in imaging speed. We have developed a new approach that should allow us to overcome this speed limitation. The major difference between conventional CT versus CT perfusion is the obtaining of an extra series of images. CT perfusion results in an increase in the amount of radiation exposure during the CT scan that measures the blood flow of the targeted tumor; however, CT perfusion is much faster than conventional CT.
Prospective participants are being invited to the study because part of the treatment towards the tumour therapy involves obtaining an angiogram.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. OR radiologic evidence of liver metastatic disease
3. Amenable to embolization or ablation as adjuvant, neoadjuvant or definitive (curative or palliative) therapy.
4. Adult \> 19 years old and estimated life expectancy over 3 months
5. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status under or equals 1
6. Adequate haematological function: Hb over or equals 9g/100mL, absolute neutrophil count over or equals 1 500/mm3, platelet count over or equals 50 000/mm3
7. Adequate renal function; serum creatinine under 150μmol/L
8. Bilirubin under or equals 50 µmol/L, Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or ALT uner or equals 5 x upper limit of normal (ULN), international normalized ratio (INR) under or equals 1.5
9. Liver cirrhosis Child Pugh A - B7
10. Ability to provide written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
2. Women who are pregnant or breast feeding
3. Allergy to contrast media
4. Contraindication to hepatic artery catheterisation, such as severe peripheral vascular disease precluding catheterisation OR contraindication to locally curative ablation due to size, location or shape.
5. Psychiatric or other disorder likely to impact on informed consent
6. Patient unable and/or unwilling to comply with treatment and study instructions
19 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of British Columbia
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dave Liu
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
David MT Liu, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UBC/VCHA/VGH
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Vancouver General Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SIEMENS Canada/USA
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
H12-03704
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.