Assessing the Rates of Major Complications in Combined Mini-incision Microscopic Varicocelectomy
NCT ID: NCT02092311
Last Updated: 2015-07-03
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
570 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-01-31
2015-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Testicular Sperm Retrieval Rate After Varicocele Ligation in Men With Non Obstructive Azoospermia
NCT07008495
The Role of Microsurgery in Surgical Treatment of Varicocele.
NCT02722187
The Effect and Prognosis of Different Operations on Varicocele - a Single-center Clinical Study
NCT01757548
Sclerotherapy of Internal Spermatic Veins in Patients With Varicocele and Localized Prostate Cancer
NCT00637208
Comparison Between Loupe-Assisted Varicocelectomy With Nitroglycerin Instillation and Microscopic Varicocelectomy
NCT06509321
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
All of them were operated by a single experienced and expert microscopic surgeon.
Informed consent is received from all of the possible candidates in accordance to national and Declaration of Helsinki guidelines.
Selection of patients for undergoing Combined varicocelectomy was done during the operation due to the nature of including criteria.
In this method after making an incision at inguinal level, veins are evaluated and if the including criteria is existed, only external spermatic vein is ligated at the depth of the inguinal canal and other veins are left alone for prevention of damage to the artery. Then another mini incision is made at high inguinal level and the rest of surgery is conducted by retroperitoneal approach.
The incidence rate of major complications (recurrence, testicular atrophy, hydrocele) of experimental group is compared to the incidence rate of the same complications of the patients in control group that were operated with currently common inguinal and subinguinal microscopic varicocelectomy accompanied by testicular delivery, an approach that is suggested by Goldstein and associates.
The study hypothesis is that using this method will lead to less major complications including recurrence, hydrocele and also less incidental injuries to the arteries that will result to less testicular atrophy.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Combined Microscopic Varicocelectomy
Patients in this arm were operated with Combined Mini-incision Microscopic approach
Combined Microscopic Varicocelectomy
After making a mini-incision at inguinal level, veins are evaluated, and if the including criteria (Complexity and tortuosity of the veins and/or existence of veins that are contiguous with arteries so that separating and ligation of the veins could jeopardize the artery) are existed, only external spermatic vein, if dilated, is ligated at the depth of the inguinal canal, and other veins are left alone for prevention of damage to the artery. Subsequently, another mini-incision is made at high inguinal level and the rest of surgery is conducted by retroperitoneal approach, which is also done microscopically
Inguinal and Subinguinal Varicocelectomy
Patients in this arm have the same including criteria as Experimental arm but they were operated with conventional and currently popular approach of Microscopic Inguinal and Sub inguinal varicocelectomy suggested by Goldstien and associates
Inguinal and Subinguinal varicocelectomy
Microscopic Inguinal and Sub inguinal varicocelectomy, recommended by Goldstein and associates, are currently popular approaches. In this approach the spermatic cord structures are pulled up and out of the wound so that the testicular artery, lymphatics, and small periarterial veins may be more easily identified. In addition, an inguinal or subinguinal approach allows access to external spermatic and even gubernacular veins.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Combined Microscopic Varicocelectomy
After making a mini-incision at inguinal level, veins are evaluated, and if the including criteria (Complexity and tortuosity of the veins and/or existence of veins that are contiguous with arteries so that separating and ligation of the veins could jeopardize the artery) are existed, only external spermatic vein, if dilated, is ligated at the depth of the inguinal canal, and other veins are left alone for prevention of damage to the artery. Subsequently, another mini-incision is made at high inguinal level and the rest of surgery is conducted by retroperitoneal approach, which is also done microscopically
Inguinal and Subinguinal varicocelectomy
Microscopic Inguinal and Sub inguinal varicocelectomy, recommended by Goldstein and associates, are currently popular approaches. In this approach the spermatic cord structures are pulled up and out of the wound so that the testicular artery, lymphatics, and small periarterial veins may be more easily identified. In addition, an inguinal or subinguinal approach allows access to external spermatic and even gubernacular veins.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Veins which are contiguous with arteries so that separating and ligation of the vein could lead to artery injury
Exclusion Criteria
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
OTHER
Omid Fertility Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Omid Pouyan, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Omid Fertility Center
Navid Pooyan, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Omid Fertility Center
Robabeh Taheri Panah, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Infertility and Reproductive Health research center of Shahid Beheshti university of medical sciences
Ashraf Ale Yasin, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Omid Fertility Center
Marzieh Agha Hosseini, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Omid Fertility Center
Hojatollah Saeidi Saeid Abadi, P.H.D
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Omid FC
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Omid fertility center
Tehran, Tehran Province, Iran
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CMMV
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.