Project CHOICE: Efficacy Testing of CHOICE and CHOICE+Normative Feedback Interventions

NCT ID: NCT02083523

Last Updated: 2014-03-11

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: COMPLETED
• Clinical Phase: PHASE1
• Total Enrollment: 48 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2013-03-31
• Study Completion Date: 2013-08-31

Brief Summary

This study will use a pilot test format to examine the efficacy of a brief Motivational Interviewing (MI) intervention developed by the investigator Dr. Douglas Smith called CHOICE (Compassionate Helpers Openly Inviting Client Empowerment)with youth referred for substance abuse assessments to substance abuse treatment agencies in Chicago and Urbana, IL.

Detailed Description

This study will use a pilot test format to examine the efficacy of a brief Motivational Interviewing (MI) intervention developed by the investigator Dr. Douglas Smith called CHOICE (Compassionate Helpers Openly Inviting Client Empowerment)with youth referred for substance abuse assessments to substance abuse treatment agencies in Chicago and Urbana, IL. The study will have two arms: one group will receive the standard CHOICE Motivational Interview (MI) while the second group will receive the CHOICE Motivational Interview with a Normative Feedback component, called CHOICE+ (CHOICE Plus). The hypothesis is that there will be no difference in outcomes between those that receive the standard CHOICE and those that receive the CHOICE+ MI.

Conditions

Substance-related Disorders

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: TREATMENT
• Blinding Strategy: SINGLE

Study Groups

Motivational Interview

The Motivational Interview, or MI, (15-30 minutes) was provided after initial substance use disorder assessments but prior to treatment admission. I twas facilitated by a computer generated report and included: an orientation to the session, discussion of the participants' strengths, an agenda setting procedure, a review of concerns, and a session summary. Therapists conveyed empathy, used reflective listening, tried to elicit and reinforce change talk elements, and elicited action steps from the participants.

Group Type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Motivational Interview

Intervention Type: BEHAVIORAL

The Motivational Interview (MI) addresses ambivalence about change. It's effects are mediated by how well counselors evoke change talk, or in-session client utterances about the: need for; commitment to; ability to; or steps needed, to change.

MI with Normative Feedback

The Motivational Interview with Normative Feedback, or MI + NF, condition/intervention included all procedures described for the MI condition. Additionally, in the MI + NF condition/intervention, the participants' days of marijuana and alcohol use were compared to two sets of norms ( age specific or level of care specific) available for treatment attending youth. Therapists used whichever norm provided a greater contrast with participants' use.

Group Type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Motivational Interview with Normative Feedback

Intervention Type: BEHAVIORAL

NOrmative Feedback (NF) contrasts and individual's substance use to available norms for one's reference group (i.e., descriptive norms.) Essentially, NF highlights how an individual's behavior is non-normative, which in turn, is thought to lead to reduced substance use.

Interventions

Motivational Interview with Normative Feedback

NOrmative Feedback (NF) contrasts and individual's substance use to available norms for one's reference group (i.e., descriptive norms.) Essentially, NF highlights how an individual's behavior is non-normative, which in turn, is thought to lead to reduced substance use.

Intervention Type: BEHAVIORAL

Motivational Interview

The Motivational Interview (MI) addresses ambivalence about change. It's effects are mediated by how well counselors evoke change talk, or in-session client utterances about the: need for; commitment to; ability to; or steps needed, to change.

Intervention Type: BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

CHOICE + (MI + NF); CHOICE

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Youth 13-19 years of age (and their parents or legal guardians if their youth has been referred for an assessment with the Prairie Center counseling staff.)
• referred for an assessment to see if they need substance use disorder treatment
• have used substances on 13 or more days out of the past 90 days or scored higher than 2 on the CRAFT assessment. -

Exclusion Criteria

• Low cognitive functioning

• Minimum Eligible Age: 13 Years
• Maximum Eligible Age: 19 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Douglas Smith

Assistant Professor Douglas Smith

Responsibility Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Douglas Smith, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Illinois Urbana Champaign

Other Identifiers

Smith13356

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id