Long-term Outcome of Proximal Row Carpectomy. Influence of the Shape of the Capitate
NCT ID: NCT02080663
Last Updated: 2014-03-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
60 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2014-03-31
2014-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Also, the shape of the head of the capitate may play a role in the development of arthritis. A more round shape could distribute the forces more equally and thus prevent the progression of cartilage damage
The study hypothesis is:
* PRC preserves range of motion and force in the long term (more than 10 years postoperatively).
* A more round head of the capitate is associated with an increased risk of developing arthritis in the new joint.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Proximal Row Carpectomy Versus Four Corner Fusion
NCT01906996
The Use of Proximal Carpal Row Versus Iliac Crest as Bone Graft in Total Wrist Fusion
NCT04403958
Comparison of ARPE Prosthesis With the Literature
NCT01904019
Follow-up of Patients After 4-row Arthrodesis or Proximal Row Carpectomy
NCT00284310
Outcomes of Motion-preserving Surgery and Arthrodesis at the Distal Interphalangeal (DIP) Joint
NCT03074916
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Questions
* VAS pain in rest and during activity
* Pain is quantified as none, minimal (pain with strenuous activity), moderate (pain with daily activity), or severe (pain at rest).
* If pain, use of analgetics, splint, …
* quick DASH
* patient related wrist evaluation (PRWE) score. form-36 (SF-36) general health status outcome ?
* Satisfaction, do it again?
* Complications? Re-operations?
* Return to work after operation, which job (manual labor?) changed job due to wrist problems? Worker's compensation claims?
Clinical review
* grip force + other side to compare (Jamar Dynamometer)
* pinch grip + other side to compare
* range of motion measurement:
* absolute and compared to other side
* flexion-extension, ulnar-radial deviation and prosupination
Radiography:
* Standard anterioposterior and lateral wrist radiography performed to evaluate the onset or degree of arthritis.
o Radiocapitate arthrosis grading:
* None
* Minimal (joint space narrowing alone),
* Moderate (joint space narrowing with adjacent subchondral sclerosis)
* severe (bone collapse, erosion, or subchondral cyst formation)
* Oldest radiography of each patient was retrieved and the shape of the capitate evaluated.
* If available, a pre-operative MRI scan could also be interpreted. (Probably no MRI's available, but MRI gives a better indication of the shape of the capitate than plain X-ray).
* Review: documentation of intra-operative findings concerning capitate and lunate fossa.
Statistical analysis
* Student's t-test on the numerical data
* Wilcoxon signed- rank test on the visual analog scales
* Differences significant at p \< .05. Two-tailed tests in all cases.
* Subgroups according to initial diagnosis
* Compare results with the initial follow-up to evaluate the prospective value of this follow-up moment.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Proximal row carpectomy
Proximal row carpectomy
Proximal row carpectomy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Proximal row carpectomy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital Pellenberg
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Maarten Van Nuffel
Fellow Upper Limb Surgery
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Maarten Van Nuffel, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospitals Leuven
Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PRC Van Nuffel De Smet
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.