Proximal Row Carpectomy Versus Four Corner Fusion

NCT ID: NCT01906996

Last Updated: 2014-02-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

114 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-07-31

Study Completion Date

2014-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

There are two types of interventions to treat a post-traumatic wrist osteoarthritis: the proximal row carpectomy and the four corner fusion. They are used to reduce pain and to maintain the mobility. In previous studies are shown that the proximal row carpectomy shows a better mobility of the wrist postoperatively, whereas the four corner fusion has lower progression of radiocarpale osteoarthritis.

The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical, radiological and subjective outcomes after the treatment with a proximal row carpectomy or a four corner fusion.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Two surgical procedures are used to treat a post-traumatic wrist osteoarthritis, especially after scaphoid non-union advanced collapse (SNAC) and scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC): the proximal row carpectomy and the four corner fusion. Both surgical procedures are rescue operations. They are used to reduce pain and to maintain the mobility, compared to a complete stiffening of the wrist.

In previous studies are shown that the proximal row carpectomy shows a better mobility of the wrist postoperatively and a lower complication rate, whereas the four corner fusion has a lower progression of radiocarpale osteoarthritis and a better grip strength.

The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical, radiological and subjective outcomes after the treatment with a proximal row carpectomy or a four corner fusion.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Wrist Osteoarthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

proximal row carpectomy

patients were treated with a proximal row carpectomy

proximal row carpectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

excision of the scaphoid, lunate and triquetrum

four corner fusion

patients were treated with a four corner fusion

four corner fusion

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

excision of the scaphoid and stiffening of the lunate, capitate and triquetrum by a plate

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

proximal row carpectomy

excision of the scaphoid, lunate and triquetrum

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

four corner fusion

excision of the scaphoid and stiffening of the lunate, capitate and triquetrum by a plate

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* post-traumatic wrist osteoarthritis
* treated with a proximal row carpectomy or four corner fusion
* signed written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* no knowledge of German
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Schulthess Klinik

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Daniel Herren

Dr. med.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Daniel B Herren, Dr. med.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Schulthess Klinik

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Schulthess Klinik

Zurich, Canton of Zurich, Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PRC01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.