Patient and Provider Glucose Reporting Preferences Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP)

NCT ID: NCT02074384

Last Updated: 2016-03-28

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

161 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-03-31

Study Completion Date

2015-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

International Diabetes Center (IDC) proposes a preference and usability study of glucose data acquisition and reporting, evaluating streamlined standardized cloud-based glucose reporting including work flow as well as patient and clinician preference at Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) Exchange sites to enhance standard Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP) reporting. This phase 2 project assesses the efficacy of standardized glucose data report generation and preferred report presentation format; both are necessary to increase use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data to improve care processes and outcomes for Type 1 diabetes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patient participation in diabetes treatment has relied upon episodic self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). SMBG assists patients and clinicians with adjustments of insulin, identification of hypoglycemia, nutritional intake and activity in order to optimize diabetes control. SMBG however is subject to bias dependent upon the testing frequency and timing. In contrast, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems capture continuous 24-hour glucose data uninterrupted and unbiased. It provides valuable information about daily/nightly alterations in glucose patterns. Unfortunately SMBG, CGM and insulin pump devices have proprietary software with unique data standards, acquisition methods, reports, and graphic displays. These differences make evaluation and comparison of SMBG or CGM data difficult for clinicians and patients. IDC created an Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP) report to reduce challenges of device specific reports through a standardized report which is produced from any device with streamlined graphic displays of glucose trends.

The phase 1 project (2012), gathered expert stakeholders (clinical, research, industry, patients) who validated data standards and recommended changes to the CGM-AGP reports. These changes are now integrated into a secure cloud-based infrastructure for AGP reporting.

Phase 2 of this project is a usability and preference study of glucose reporting systems. It will include an in depth study of 6 T1D Ex clinical sites. The T1D Exchange Clinic Network was formed to support the development of a large registry of adults and children with type 1 diabetes for the purpose of conducting multiple studies proposed by T1D Exchange investigators, and other researchers, patients, and companies.

The 6 sites will be selected for an in-depth study utilizing middleware data collection services (Diasend or SweetSpot) to facilitate efficient collection of data from diverse devices. These middleware solutions integrate with the captūrAGP system to automatically produce an AGP report. These sites will test the feasibility of AGP cloud reporting while collecting patient and clinician opinions on report preference. All 6 sites participating in phase 2 will collect patient and clinician preference measures. Two study sites will undergo time in motion (TIM) measurement and workflow mapping of current process. This TIM sub-study includes workflow mapping of current and cloud-based processes utilizing Toyota Lean (Kaizen) methodology. Sites 3 - 6 will receive enhanced designs through the adaptive trial method with learnings applied from sites 1 and 2.

A key deliverable of this study is patient and clinician insight into their utilization of CGM reporting technologies. Recognizing that adoption of technology is often stymied by time constraints, report reliability and ease of interpretation, these variables will be examined. The goal of phase 2 is to analyze the viability of standard reporting and to evaluate preference (patient and clinicians) for and perceived value of different types of glucose pattern reports (AGP vs. device) including clinical practice time saved.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Type 1 Diabetes

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Continuous Glucose Monitoring

Participants will wear Continuous Glucose Monitoring for two weeks.

Group Type OTHER

Continuous Glucose Monitor

Intervention Type DEVICE

CGM device for measurement of interstitial glucose on a 24/7 continuous cycle.

Self Monitoring Blood Glucose

Participants will self test for two weeks.

Group Type OTHER

Self Monitoring Blood Glucose

Intervention Type DEVICE

Participants will use their own SMBG device.

Clinicians

Clinicians completing study visits.

Group Type OTHER

Clinician

Intervention Type OTHER

Survey of clinicians after study visits

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Continuous Glucose Monitor

CGM device for measurement of interstitial glucose on a 24/7 continuous cycle.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Self Monitoring Blood Glucose

Participants will use their own SMBG device.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Clinician

Survey of clinicians after study visits

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Dexcom G4 professional version Continuous Glucose Monitor

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Type 1 Diabetics

Exclusion Criteria

* Less than the age of 7
* Non-English Speaker
Minimum Eligible Age

7 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

HealthPartners Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Richard Bergenstal, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Park Nicollet

Deborah Mulllen, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Park Nicollet

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Eda Cengiz

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Larry Deeb

Tallahassee, Florida, United States

Site Status

Henry Ford

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Park Nicollet International Diabetes Center

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

The Diabetes Center, PLLC

Ocean Springs, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

St. Vincent's

Billings, Montana, United States

Site Status

Columbia University

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

04356-14-A

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.