Stress Management for Cancer Patients: How Well Does it Work? (C2H-D)

NCT ID: NCT02070250

Last Updated: 2021-09-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

158 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-11-30

Study Completion Date

2021-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Psychological interventions for cancer patients have been tested and found to reduce stress and improve quality of life. These interventions have been tested at academic medical centers but have not been available for use by community mental health professionals. One such intervention is the Biobehavioral Intervention (BBI), developed by Professor Barbara L. Andersen and colleagues at Ohio State (OSU). Current funding has enabled the investigators to train mental health professionals from across the country to deliver the BBI at their institution. Recently diagnosed cancer patients who are participating in the BBI group at these institutions may participate in a research study completing self report measures asking about psychological and behavioral outcomes (for example, mood, stress, diet and physical activity). The investigators hypothesize that individuals participating in the intervention will report improvements in outcomes, such as reduced stress and improved mood, reduced symptoms of the disease and treatment, etc., after completing the intervention and continue to report these improvements up to 6 months after the group ends. OSU will coordinate this data collection project but information about participating sites is listed in http://clinicaltrials.gov.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Mood Stress, Psychological

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

From Cancer to Health (C2H-D)

Individuals participating in the From Cancer to Health (C2H-D) Stress Management Psychological Intervention

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

From Cancer to Health (C2H-D)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

From Cancer to Health gives people with cancer the information and tools they need to manage their stress to improve their health throughout the cancer journey. Each institution involved in this study will implement the core techniques of the C2H-D Intervention but may alter the format somewhat to meet their patient population needs (e.g., shorten hourly 18 week intervention into 2-hour 9 week intervention).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

From Cancer to Health (C2H-D)

From Cancer to Health gives people with cancer the information and tools they need to manage their stress to improve their health throughout the cancer journey. Each institution involved in this study will implement the core techniques of the C2H-D Intervention but may alter the format somewhat to meet their patient population needs (e.g., shorten hourly 18 week intervention into 2-hour 9 week intervention).

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

C2H Biobehavioral Intervention BBI Stress management

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Recent initial diagnosis of cancer without metastatic disease
* Able to speak/read English

Exclusion Criteria

* Organic brain syndrome
* Dementia
* Mental retardation
* non-English speaking
* Significant sensory deficit
* Severe mental illness (e.g., schizophrenia, psychotic disorder)
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Barbara Andersen

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Barbara L Andersen, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Ohio State University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cancer Center of East Alabama Medical Center

Auburn, Alabama, United States

Site Status

UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

Providence Saint John's Health Center

Santa Monica, California, United States

Site Status

Tahoe Forest Cancer Center

Truckee, California, United States

Site Status

Wellness House

Hinsdale, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Cancer Wellness Center

Northbrook, Illinois, United States

Site Status

IU Health Ball Memorial Hospital

Muncie, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Genesis Health Center

Davenport, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Unity Point Health/Gilda's Club Quad Cities

Davenport, Iowa, United States

Site Status

University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

OSU Stephanie Spielman Comprehensive Breast Center

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Geisinger Medical Center

Danville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Seton UT Southwestern

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Baylor Regional Medical Center at Plano, Texas

Plano, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ashmore JA, Ditterich KW, Conley CC, Wright MR, Howland PS, Huggins KL, Cooreman J, Andrews PS, Nicholas DR, Roberts L, Hewitt L, Scales JN, Delap JK, Gray CA, Tyler LA, Collins C, Whiting CM, Brothers BM, Ryba MM, Andersen BL. Evaluating the effectiveness and implementation of evidence-based treatment: A multisite hybrid design. Am Psychol. 2019 May-Jun;74(4):459-473. doi: 10.1037/amp0000309. Epub 2018 Jul 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30024215 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R25CA163197

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

OSU-13127

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Brief CBT for Anxiety and Advanced Cancer
NCT00706290 COMPLETED PHASE2