Electronic Method for Recording Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
NCT ID: NCT02060136
Last Updated: 2014-02-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
29 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2013-06-30
2014-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Hypothesis: Electronic voiding diary, would automate the recording and analysis of data, expedite the process, improve its accuracy and cost effectiveness.
Electronic recording of lower urinary tract symptoms (SUF) uses wireless phone and web based technologies to record LUTS remotely and store the data on a secure website which can be accessed by the doctor or patient whenever needed. The goal of this study was to compare its validity and reliability to the traditional micturition chart (MC) recording method - the current gold standard where the patient records the time of micturition and degree of urgency using a pen and paper.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Electronic Urinary Flowmeter to Improve Accuracy of Bladder Diaries .
NCT05702294
Bladder Diary for Female Storage LUTS
NCT06222515
Voiding Class Study for Symptom Reduction and Quality of Life in Children With LUTS
NCT05146258
Validation of the Short Form of the "Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Treatment Constraints Assessment" Questionnaire
NCT06853366
Auriculotherapy on Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Elderly Men
NCT02330107
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A pen and pencil MC will be used to record baseline parameters (voiding urgency and frequency). Quality of life (QoL) will be evaluated using International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Questionnaire, and two standardized questions: Quality of Life due to Urinary Symptoms (QoL US) and Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC).
Time frame: Participants were followed for the duration of the study which consists of two three day periods when every micturition event and lower urinary tract symptom not associated with micturition was recorded. An expected average time will be 6 days.
Twenty nine men, average age 67.8 years (range 49 - 80), which presented to the urology clinic with LUTS, were included in the study. After signing the informed consent, patients will be asked to record every micturition and degree of urgency using SUF for a period of 3 days. They will then be asked to record their frequency of micturition and the degree of every episode of urgency using a pen and paper MC for an equal length of time. The efficacy of recording LUTS with each method will be analyzed and compared. The content validity of SUF (assessment of whether the instrument makes sense to patients), will be assessed at the conclusion of the study when all patients will be interviewed one-on-one by a specialized research nurse. Patients will be asked to state their preference for one of the two diaries, and disclose the number of events they forgot to or could not record. The construct validity (relationship between the recorded data and underlying theories) will be evaluated by the correlation of symptoms recorded with SUF or MC based on QoL measures. The results of this study will be compared to previously published evidence, suggesting that more severe LUTS are associated with a lower score on the health related QoL questionnaires.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CROSSOVER
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Study group
Men presenting to the urology clinic with lower urinary tract symptoms
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
45 Years
90 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital Ostrava
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Vaclav Prochazka, MD, PhD. MSc
Chief research officer
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jan Krhut, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ostrava University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Urology
Ostrava, Nothern Moravia, Czechia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SUF LUTS
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.