Conditioned Pharmacotherapeutic Effects in Hypertension
NCT ID: NCT02056626
Last Updated: 2019-07-09
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
44 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-03-31
2018-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Beta2-adrenergic System and Training
NCT04616261
Effect of Carvedilol Controlled-Release (CR) and Atenolol on Central Blood Pressure
NCT00669279
A Study Evaluating the Effects of Nebivolol on Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Patients
NCT00200460
Mechanisms of Refractory Hypertension (Carvedilol)
NCT02357004
Vascular Effects of Carvedilol Versus Metoprolol in Hypertensive Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
NCT00123604
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
It is possible that a non-continuous schedule of pharmacologic reinforcement (and the concomitant reduced amount of active drug) will exert effects that are indistinguishable from a continuous (standard) regimen of pharmacotherapy (a higher cumulative amount of drug). That outcome or comparison, however, is not critical for evaluating the role of conditioning in the pharmacotherapy of hypertension. Specifically, we will test the hypotheses that:
1. patients treated under a partial schedule of antihypertensive medication will show a greater amelioration of symptoms than that achieved by patients treated with that same (reduced) amount of drug administered under a continuous schedule of reinforcement;
Conditions permitting, we will also test the predictions that:
2. irrespective of initial treatment regimen, relapse will occur more quickly following withdrawal of active medication in patients who do not continue to receive conditioned stimuli (placebo) than in patients who continue to receive conditioned stimuli; and
3. when active drug is withdrawn and replaced by conditioned stimuli alone, resistance to extinction will be greater (i.e., rate of relapse will be less) among patients treated under a partial schedule of reinforcement than patients treated with the same amount of drug administered under a continuous schedule of reinforcement (the partial reinforcement effect).
Positive results would transform the study and practice of pharmacotherapy with respect to placebo effects by providing a new model within which to design treatment protocols for patients with chronic diseases that capitalizes on conditioned pharmacotherapeutic responses. The model, from which testable hypotheses can be derived, also provides a new framework for research on placebo effects and the mechanisms underlying such phenomena.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
arm 2
partial reinforcement, 6.25 mg twice daily, 25% of time (15 days)
carvedilol
arm 3
controlled dosing schedule 6.25 mg twice daily (15 days)
carvedilol
arm 4
controlled dosing schedule 6.25 mg twice daily, every other day (15 days)
carvedilol
arm 1
standard therapy, 25 mg twice daily (15 days)
carvedilol
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
carvedilol
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* between 18-80 years old
Exclusion Criteria
* currently pregnant, or trying to become pregnant
* being treated with a beta-blocker
* use of illicit drugs
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Rochester
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
John Bisognano
M.D., Ph.D
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
John D. Bisognano, M.D., Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Rochester
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Rochester
Rochester, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
WOLF S. Effects of suggestion and conditioning on the action of chemical agents in human subjects; the pharmacology of placebos. J Clin Invest. 1950 Jan;29(1):100-9. doi: 10.1172/JCI102225. No abstract available.
LASAGNA L, MOSTELLER F, VON FELSINGER JM, BEECHER HK. A study of the placebo response. Am J Med. 1954 Jun;16(6):770-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(54)90441-6. No abstract available.
KNOWLES JB. CONDITIONING AND THE PLACEBO EFFECT: THE EFFECTS OF DECAFFEINATED COFFEE ON SIMPLE REACTION TIME IN HABITUAL COFFEE DRINKERS. Behav Res Ther. 1963 Aug;1:151-7. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(63)90018-4. No abstract available.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.