ClinicCompanion. Compared to the Use of a Goniometer

NCT ID: NCT02043639

Last Updated: 2024-10-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-08-31

Study Completion Date

2016-02-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In this study, the goal is to find out if the clinicCompanion™ is effective in measuring range of motion when compared to the goniometer. Currently, the goniometer is an approved device to measure range of motion by the FDA, but the clinicCompanion™ is not.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study procedure will test the range of motion of the subjects shoulders two different ways: using a goniometer and using the clinicCompanion™. Both tools are designed to measure the degree of movement subjects are able to do. Researchers will take 12 measurements on each arm for each device, for a total of 24 measurements per device. That is a total of 48 measurements for both devices.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Shoulder Impingement Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* new or established clinic patients from PI's medical practice at Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center
* 18 years of age and older

Exclusion Criteria

* no use of limbs
* amputees
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medical Companion LLC

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Maharaj m Singh, PHD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Navjot m Kohli, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Aurora St Lukes Medical Center

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Mullaney MJ, McHugh MP, Johnson CP, Tyler TF. Reliability of shoulder range of motion comparing a goniometer to a digital level. Physiother Theory Pract. 2010 Jul;26(5):327-33. doi: 10.3109/09593980903094230.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20557263 (View on PubMed)

van de Pol RJ, van Trijffel E, Lucas C. Inter-rater reliability for measurement of passive physiological range of motion of upper extremity joints is better if instruments are used: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2010;56(1):7-17. doi: 10.1016/s1836-9553(10)70049-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20500132 (View on PubMed)

MacDermid JC, Chesworth BM, Patterson S, Roth JH. Intratester and intertester reliability of goniometric measurement of passive lateral shoulder rotation. J Hand Ther. 1999 Jul-Sep;12(3):187-92. doi: 10.1016/s0894-1130(99)80045-3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10459526 (View on PubMed)

Riddle DL, Rothstein JM, Lamb RL. Goniometric reliability in a clinical setting. Shoulder measurements. Phys Ther. 1987 May;67(5):668-73. doi: 10.1093/ptj/67.5.668.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3575423 (View on PubMed)

Khoshelham K, Elberink SO. Accuracy and resolution of Kinect depth data for indoor mapping applications. Sensors (Basel). 2012;12(2):1437-54. doi: 10.3390/s120201437. Epub 2012 Feb 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22438718 (View on PubMed)

Dutta T. Evaluation of the Kinect sensor for 3-D kinematic measurement in the workplace. Appl Ergon. 2012 Jul;43(4):645-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.09.011. Epub 2011 Oct 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22018839 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

13-40 ClinicCompanion.

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Eccentric Exercises for Shoulder Pain
NCT02092272 TERMINATED NA