Overhead Perturbation Training for Glenohumeral Joint Instability

NCT ID: NCT03380494

Last Updated: 2018-02-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

16 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-04-30

Study Completion Date

2018-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of the trial is investigate the benefits of a novel, newly invented exercise technique protocol relative to physiological changes in upper limb proprioception (primary) and subjective readiness for return to sport (secondary).

The intervention (Overhead perturbation training) will be compared with a control intervention (non-perturbed stimulus) in a population of type II anterior glenohumeral joint instability patients (according to the Stanmore classification of instability). Each group will be assessed at baseline for glenohumeral joint proprioception (via lazer-pointer active relocation test), as well as perceived functional level (via Western Ontario Shoulder Instability index) and Shoulder Instability-Return to Sport after Injury (SIRSI) score. They will then undertake a 6 week exercise regime which is exactly the same- except the intervention used perturbated stimulus and the control uses non-perturbed stimulus. Outcome measures are re-assessed at the end of the intervention period. Results will be assessed statistically for statistical significance.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Overhead athletic performance requires both static and dynamic mechanisms to coordinate glenohumeral and scapulothoracic stability to induce the appropriate motor response. Active function is predicated on a sufficient balance of muscular strength, endurance, flexibility and neuromuscular response to proprioceptive input. Coordinating, planning and synthesising complex multi-joint information is a process within the central nervous system, from the periphery to the higher centres of the brain, in a synergy of afferent and efferent feedback.

Joint position sense plays an important role for the shoulder joint in two key components of athletic performance: conscious limb placement and unconscious motor patterning in response to external force during movement. Such motor patterns can be characterised as the motor responsiveness to perturbations of joint position. This assists efficiency of muscular coordination when the shoulder is placed in the long lever position during overhead activities, where the desired motor pattern reaction is essential alongside contractile strength for successful performance and attenuation of injury risk. It is suggested that efficiency in neuromuscular control to provide responsive stabilization is necessary to sustain high levels of overhead performance and to avoid injury. The neuromuscular control response of the shoulder musculature on glenohumeral and scapulothoracic joint positions becomes deficient in the presence of structural injury. For example, rotator cuff injury specifically leads to deficiencies in neuromuscular control timing, patterning and strength compared with asymptomatic clients.

Perturbation of upper limb position during overhead activities causes unpredicted change in tissue length, resulting in a responsive pattern of muscular contractions. The OPT exercise series ensures that the deficient client is exposed to positions of vulnerability against displacement of the limb by external force. It is postulated that neural adaptations are induced through introduction of both rhythmic and sudden alterations to these positions A training stimulus (such as OPT) which facilitates neuromuscular control and speed of response to perturbation has potential to enhance overhead function. This signifies the role of neuromuscular control training in both rehabilitation and prevention of shoulder joint injury. The inclusion of this type of exercise training during rehabilitation and as part of injury risk minimisation strategies is an important component to sustain synchronization of muscular movement patterns.

Population in Focus

The subjects recruited for this study will be explained in greater depth further in the proposal, however are characterised by having a degree of functional glenohumeral joint instability. The physiotherapy class setting which will be utilised as the source of referrals is a heterogenous group of upper limb disorder patients, with a distinct sub group of individuals with functional instability who achieve sufficient recovery to meet the criteria for return to sport. According to the Stanmore classification of shoulder instability this group would correspond to Polar type II-III- that is placed on a continuum between atraumatic structural instability and non-structural, muscle patterning instability.

Current treatment versus OPT

The optimal management of anterior shoulder instability in those who undertake sport continues to be a challenge. Exercise therapy rehabilitation in a structured protocol shows statistically significant changes in validated outcome measures (Oxford Instability Shoulder Scores and Western Ontario Shoulder Index scores) but fails to incorporate exercise at the point of most instability through range of motion, particularly with sufficient challenge to the neuromuscular system to promote adaptation against perturbation at this point.

Of course OPT is not suggested to replace traditional measures of exercise therapy, but instead is designed to complement and optimise rehabilitation. By influencing both the physical and psychometric obstructions to return to activity, the OPT aims to improve patient care and enhance quality of life in its users. This has the additional benefit of streamlining the care pathway of this patient population, and in preparing them to return to higher levels of function, will potentially reduce recurrence of future injury. The pathway for these patients is optimised and made more efficient by providing the same amount of therapist contact, in a class setting to incorporate multiple users at once, but should enhance post intervention clinical scores. The application of similar programmes as a component of rehabilitation is already considered elsewhere; however the specific nature of OPT is suggested to enhance even these currently used protocols.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Exercise Movement Techniques Shoulder Pain Glenohumeral Subluxation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Double blind, randomised controlled trial
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Overhead perturbation training technique

Patients will undertake a series of exercise positions with the arm elevated above shoulder level with a stimulus applied with a weight and resistance band- such that the glenohumeral joint is exposed to a perturbed stimulus and has to utilise proprioception and motor control to correct arm position. The exercise session will be 45mins in length and occur once per week for 6 weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Overhead perturbation training

Intervention Type OTHER

A specifically chosen weight is attached to a 1m resistance band held above the head, hanging against gravity. The participant is encouraged to sustain a static position, where the weight and band provide variable magnitude perturbations to arm position. The body position of the participant is modified to facilitate greater and lesser perturbations. Bodily movements are prescribed to encourage joint perturbation. The participant undertakes 3 sets of 25 repetitions (60s rest) and continues with variable stimulus until fatigued.

Non-perturbed exercise

Patients will undertake a series of exercise positions with the arm elevated above shoulder level with a stimulus applied via a weight held in the hand- such that the glenohumeral joint is exposed to a load but without a perturbation of joint position. The exercise session will be 45mins in length and occur once per week for 6 weeks.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Non-perturbed training

Intervention Type OTHER

A weight is grasped by the participant and elevated above head to the same position as the OPT intervention. The participant is encouraged to sustain a static position. The body position of the participant is modified to facilitate greater and lesser perturbations. Bodily movements are prescribed to encourage joint perturbation. The participant undertakes 3 sets of 25 repetitions (60s rest) and continues with variable stimulus until fatigued.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Overhead perturbation training

A specifically chosen weight is attached to a 1m resistance band held above the head, hanging against gravity. The participant is encouraged to sustain a static position, where the weight and band provide variable magnitude perturbations to arm position. The body position of the participant is modified to facilitate greater and lesser perturbations. Bodily movements are prescribed to encourage joint perturbation. The participant undertakes 3 sets of 25 repetitions (60s rest) and continues with variable stimulus until fatigued.

Intervention Type OTHER

Non-perturbed training

A weight is grasped by the participant and elevated above head to the same position as the OPT intervention. The participant is encouraged to sustain a static position. The body position of the participant is modified to facilitate greater and lesser perturbations. Bodily movements are prescribed to encourage joint perturbation. The participant undertakes 3 sets of 25 repetitions (60s rest) and continues with variable stimulus until fatigued.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

OPT

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\-

Exclusion Criteria

* Presence of:
* Connective tissue disorder (Marfan's, Ehlos-Danlos)
* Nerve disorders: cervical radiculopathy +/- myotomal weakness; peripheral neuropathy/ palsy (long thoracic nerve palsy, axillary nerve palsy, suprascapular nerve palsy, etc.); brachial neuritis.
* Neuropathic peripheral sensitivity and/ or central sensitisation
* Post operative orthopaedic intervention \< 12 weeks post MRI confirmed full thickness rotator cuff tear
* Distal upper limb/ hand pathology which limits the ability to grasp (including specific pathological signs of lateral epicondylaglia, carpal tunnel syndrome, carpal instability, etc).
* \- inability to follow instructions
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Guys and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Jennifer Boston

Role: CONTACT

02071887188 ext. 54426

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

229780

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

229780

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.