Low-dose Laxative Improves Performance and Feasibility of Computed Tomography Colonography (CTC)
NCT ID: NCT02040285
Last Updated: 2014-01-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
52 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-02-29
2012-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Bowel Cleansing for Colonoscopy: Comparison Between a Same Day Low-Volume Preparation and a Conventional 4L Split One
NCT01685853
Efficacy and Safety of Bisacodyl and Lactulose as a Preparation for Colonoscopy
NCT02123017
Effect of PEG, Bisacodyl and Prucalopride on Colonic Motility in Healthy Subjects
NCT03279341
Evaluation of a Mixed Bowel Prep (2L PEG + Bisacodyl) Versus PEG With Ascorbate
NCT01509131
Loperamide vs. Placebo's Effect on Ileostomy Output: A Clinical Randomized Blinded Cross-over Study
NCT02266849
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
High volume cathartic preparations, low volume cathartic solutions with oral tagging agent and tagging agent only are the procedures available for CTC.
High volume preparations are a considerable burden for patients. Low volume cathartic solutions are more accepted by the patients, reduce the amount of tagging agent and the waiting time to the exam. Tagging agent only preparations represent a risk if they are taken without medical supervision.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Free laxative CTC
Iopamidol
the day before CTC:
* low fiber diet
* at 15.00: 90 ml of Iopamidol in 250 ml of water
* at 17.00: 90 ml of Iopamidol in 250 ml of water
* at 20.00: start liquid diet
Low-dose laxative bowel preparation for CTC
Bisacodyl & PEG-CS
the day before the CTC:
* low fiber diet
* at 15.00: 2 tablets of bisacodyl (5 mg)
* at 17.00: 1 litre of PEG-CS
* liquid diet
the day of the exam:
* at home: 2 tablets of bisacodyl (5 mg)
* at the Hospital (3 hours after tablets intake): 90 ml of Iopamidol in 500 ml of water
* at the Hospital (5 minutes after Iopamidol intake): 10 mg of Metoclopramide mono chlorohydrate monohydrate im
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Bisacodyl & PEG-CS
the day before the CTC:
* low fiber diet
* at 15.00: 2 tablets of bisacodyl (5 mg)
* at 17.00: 1 litre of PEG-CS
* liquid diet
the day of the exam:
* at home: 2 tablets of bisacodyl (5 mg)
* at the Hospital (3 hours after tablets intake): 90 ml of Iopamidol in 500 ml of water
* at the Hospital (5 minutes after Iopamidol intake): 10 mg of Metoclopramide mono chlorohydrate monohydrate im
Iopamidol
the day before CTC:
* low fiber diet
* at 15.00: 90 ml of Iopamidol in 250 ml of water
* at 17.00: 90 ml of Iopamidol in 250 ml of water
* at 20.00: start liquid diet
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Known or suspected gastrointestinal obstruction or perforation, toxic megacolon, ileo, major colonic surgery
* History of anaphylaxis to Iopamidol or allergic reactions to drugs
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Azienda Policlinico Umberto I
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Andrea Laghi
Prof., MD
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Policlinico Umberto I
Roma, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CTC-Prep 1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.