Efficacy Study of Different Laboratory Management Strategies and Drug Regimens in HIV-infected Children in Africa
NCT ID: NCT02028676
Last Updated: 2014-06-06
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
1206 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-03-31
2012-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1. Whether clinically driven monitoring (CDM) will have a similar outcome in terms of disease progression or death as routine laboratory and clinical monitoring (LCM) for toxicity (haematology/biochemistry) and efficacy (CD4)?
2. Whether induction with four drugs from two ART classes followed by maintenance with three drugs after 36 weeks be more effective than a continuous non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI)-based triple drug regimen in terms of CD4 and clinical outcome?
Two secondary objectives were to determine
3. Whether changing from twice daily lamivudine+abacavir to once daily lamivudine+abacavir after 48 weeks on ART will have a similar outcome in terms of virological suppression and will result in improvements in adherence to ART?
4. Whether stopping daily cotrimoxazole prophylaxis in children over 3 years of age who have been on ART for at least 96 weeks has a similar outcome in terms of hospitalisation or death as continuing daily cotrimoxazole?
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Reduction of EArly mortaLITY in HIV-infected Adults and Children Starting Antiretroviral Therapy
NCT01825031
Cotrimoxazole Prophylaxis Cessation Study Among Stabilized HIV-Infected Adult Patients on HAART in Entebbe, Uganda
NCT00674921
The Pediatric HIV Nutrition Study in Uganda
NCT02421302
Contributing Factors for Poor HIV Treatment Response in Children With TB/HIV Coinfection
NCT03800407
Comparison of Treatment Failure Criteria in HIV-Infected Children in Uganda
NCT04489953
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
FACTORIAL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Clinically Driven Monitoring (CDM)
Clinically Driven Monitoring (CDM)
Participants were examined by a doctor and had routine full blood count with white cell differential, lymphocyte subsets (CD4, CD8), biochemistry tests (bilirubin, urea, creatinine, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase) at screening, randomisation (lymphocytes only), weeks 4, 8, and 12, then every 12 weeks. Screening results were used to assess eligibility. All subsequent results at and after randomisation were only returned if requested for clinical management (authorised by centre project leaders); haemoglobin results at week 8 were automatically returned on the basis of early anaemia in a previous adult trial as were grade 4 laboratory toxicities (protocol safety criteria). Total lymphocytes and CD4 tests were never returned for CDM participants, but for all children other investigations (including tests from the routine panels) could be requested and concomitant drugs prescribed, as clinically indicated at extra patient-initiated or scheduled visits.
Laboratory plus Clinical Monitoring (LCM)
Laboratory plus Clinical Monitoring (LCM)
Participants were examined by a doctor and had routine full blood count with white cell differential, lymphocyte subsets (CD4, CD8), biochemistry tests (bilirubin, urea, creatinine, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase) at screening, randomisation (lymphocytes only), weeks 4, 8, and 12, then every 12 weeks. All results were returned to physicians for patient management. Other investigations (including tests from the routine panels) could be requested and concomitant drugs prescribed, as clinically indicated at extra patient-initiated or scheduled visits.
Arm A: abacavir (ABC)+lamivudine (3TC)+NNRTI
ABC \[abacavir\]: syrup or tablet, dosed twice-daily according to weight-bands following WHO 3TC \[lamivudine\]: syrup or tablet, dosed twice-daily according to weight-bands following WHO non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI): either nevirapine or efavirenz based on availability (provided by national ART programmes in Uganda/Zimbabwe). Nevirapine syrup or tablet dosed twice-daily according to weight-bands following WHO. Efavirenz tablets dosed once-daily according to weight-bands following WHO.
Arm A: ABC+3TC+NNRTI
Children received a standard WHO-recommended regimen of open-label lamivudine, abacavir, plus NNRTI continuously. The NNRTI (nevirapine or efavirenz) was chosen by clinicians according to local availability and age.
Arm B: ZDV+ABC+3TC+NNRTI->ABC+3TC+NNRTI maintenance
ZDV \[abacavir\]: syrup or tablet, dosed twice-daily according to weight-bands following WHO ABC \[abacavir\]: syrup or tablet, dosed twice-daily according to weight-bands following WHO 3TC \[lamivudine\]: syrup or tablet, dosed twice-daily according to weight-bands following WHO NNRTI: either nevirapine or efavirenz based on availability (provided by national ART programmes in Uganda/Zimbabwe). Nevirapine syrup or tablet dosed twice-daily according to weight-bands following WHO. Efavirenz tablets dosed once-daily according to weight-bands following WHO.
Arm B: ZDV+ABC+3TC+NNRTI->ABC+3TC+NNRTI maintenance
Children initiated ART using an induction-maintenance approach, starting with open-label four-drug lamivudine, abacavir, NNRTI, plus zidovudine for 36 weeks, then open-label lamivudine, abacavir, plus NNRTI subsequently. The NNRTI (nevirapine or efavirenz) was chosen by clinicians according to local availability and age.
Arm C: ZDV+ABC+3TC+NNRTI->ZDV+ABC+3TC maintenance
ZDV \[abacavir\]: syrup or tablet, dosed twice-daily according to weight-bands following WHO ABC \[abacavir\]: syrup or tablet, dosed twice-daily according to weight-bands following WHO 3TC \[lamivudine\]: syrup or tablet, dosed twice-daily according to weight-bands following WHO NNRTI: either nevirapine or efavirenz based on availability (provided by national ART programmes in Uganda/Zimbabwe). Nevirapine syrup or tablet dosed twice-daily according to weight-bands following WHO. Efavirenz tablets dosed once-daily according to weight-bands following WHO.
Arm C: ZDV+ABC+3TC+NNRTI->ZDV+ABC+3TC maintenance
Children initiated ART using an induction-maintenance approach, starting with open-label four-drug lamivudine, abacavir, NNRTI, plus zidovudine for 36 weeks, then open-label lamivudine, abacavir, plus zidovudine subsequently (triple NRTI maintenance). The NNRTI (nevirapine or efavirenz) was chosen by clinicians according to local availability and age.
Once-daily ABC+3TC
ABC \[abacavir\]: syrup or tablet, dosed once-daily according to weight-bands following WHO 3TC \[lamivudine\]: syrup or tablet, dosed once-daily according to weight-bands following WHO
Once-daily ABC+3TC
Twice-daily ABC+3TC
ABC \[abacavir\]: syrup or tablet, dosed twice-daily according to weight-bands following WHO 3TC \[lamivudine\]: syrup or tablet, dosed twice-daily according to weight-bands following WHO
Twice-daily ABC+3TC
Continued cotrimoxazole prophylaxis
Once-daily doses 5-\<15 kg: 200 mg of trimethoprim + 40 mg sulfamethoxazole 15-\<30 kg: 400 mg trimethoprim + 80 mg sulfamethoxazole \>=30 kg: 800 mg trimethoprim + 160 mg sulfamethoxazole
Continued cotrimoxazole prophylaxis
Stopped cotrimoxazole prophylaxis
Children had been taking once-daily cotrimoxazole prophylaxis since at least ART initiation. Children randomised to this experimental arm stopped taking cotrimoxazole prophylaxis.
Stopped cotrimoxazole prophylaxis
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Clinically Driven Monitoring (CDM)
Participants were examined by a doctor and had routine full blood count with white cell differential, lymphocyte subsets (CD4, CD8), biochemistry tests (bilirubin, urea, creatinine, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase) at screening, randomisation (lymphocytes only), weeks 4, 8, and 12, then every 12 weeks. Screening results were used to assess eligibility. All subsequent results at and after randomisation were only returned if requested for clinical management (authorised by centre project leaders); haemoglobin results at week 8 were automatically returned on the basis of early anaemia in a previous adult trial as were grade 4 laboratory toxicities (protocol safety criteria). Total lymphocytes and CD4 tests were never returned for CDM participants, but for all children other investigations (including tests from the routine panels) could be requested and concomitant drugs prescribed, as clinically indicated at extra patient-initiated or scheduled visits.
Laboratory plus Clinical Monitoring (LCM)
Participants were examined by a doctor and had routine full blood count with white cell differential, lymphocyte subsets (CD4, CD8), biochemistry tests (bilirubin, urea, creatinine, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase) at screening, randomisation (lymphocytes only), weeks 4, 8, and 12, then every 12 weeks. All results were returned to physicians for patient management. Other investigations (including tests from the routine panels) could be requested and concomitant drugs prescribed, as clinically indicated at extra patient-initiated or scheduled visits.
Arm A: ABC+3TC+NNRTI
Children received a standard WHO-recommended regimen of open-label lamivudine, abacavir, plus NNRTI continuously. The NNRTI (nevirapine or efavirenz) was chosen by clinicians according to local availability and age.
Arm B: ZDV+ABC+3TC+NNRTI->ABC+3TC+NNRTI maintenance
Children initiated ART using an induction-maintenance approach, starting with open-label four-drug lamivudine, abacavir, NNRTI, plus zidovudine for 36 weeks, then open-label lamivudine, abacavir, plus NNRTI subsequently. The NNRTI (nevirapine or efavirenz) was chosen by clinicians according to local availability and age.
Arm C: ZDV+ABC+3TC+NNRTI->ZDV+ABC+3TC maintenance
Children initiated ART using an induction-maintenance approach, starting with open-label four-drug lamivudine, abacavir, NNRTI, plus zidovudine for 36 weeks, then open-label lamivudine, abacavir, plus zidovudine subsequently (triple NRTI maintenance). The NNRTI (nevirapine or efavirenz) was chosen by clinicians according to local availability and age.
Once-daily ABC+3TC
Twice-daily ABC+3TC
Continued cotrimoxazole prophylaxis
Stopped cotrimoxazole prophylaxis
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* participating in the DART trial OR
* being treated with ART OR
* HIV positive but not yet needing treatment but with access to a treatment programme when ART is required OR
* HIV negative. Children of DART participants should have first priority on any available remaining slots to enter ARROW.
2. Parents or guardians, and children where appropriate according to age and knowledge of HIV status, must be willing and able to give informed consent for randomisation to CDM or LCM and to first-line ART strategy.
3. Participants must have a confirmed documented diagnosis of HIV-1 infection:
1. For children aged under 18 months: two separate peripheral blood specimens from different days, both results being positive with HIV-DNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
2. For children aged 18 months or over: antibody positive serology by ELISA test (confirmed by licensed second ELISA or Western Blot) or WHO approved rapid test (performed in series) both on the same sample. Any child previously tested at another clinic should have a repeat test at an ARROW screening laboratory to confirm their status.
4. Age 3 months to 17 years (13-17 years to be capped at 10%)
5. ART naïve (except for exposure to perinatal ART for the prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission).
6. Meeting criteria for requiring ART according to WHO stage and CD4 percent or count:
* WHO paediatric clinical stage IV disease: treat regardless of CD4 percent or count
* WHO paediatric clinical stage III disease:
* \<12 months: treat all
* \>12 months: treat all children irrespective of the CD4 percent or count; however, in children aged \> 12 months with tuberculosis, lymphocytic interstitial pneumonia (LIP), oral hairy leukoplakia (OHP) or thrombocytopenia (low platelet count treat) be guided by CD4 cell assays (see below).
* WHO paediatric clinical stage II or I disease: treat guided by CD4 percent or count
* CD4%\<25% for infants \<12 months;
* CD4%\<20% for children 1-\<3 years;
* CD4% \<15% for children 3-\<5years;
* CD4% \<15% for children \> 5years (consideration should also be taken of the CD4 count. A CD4 count \<200 cells/mm3 can be used to guide starting ART and CD4 should generally be \<350 cells/mm3.)
1. Participating in ARROW
2. On ART for at least 36 weeks
3. Currently taking lamivudine+abacavir twice daily as part of their ART regimen and expected to stay on these two drugs for at least the next 12 weeks
4. Parents or guardians, and children where appropriate according to age and knowledge of HIV status, must be willing and able to give informed consent for randomisation to once or twice daily lamivudine+abacavir
1. Participating in ARROW
2. Aged at least 3 years
3. Initiated ART at least 96 weeks previously, and received at least 96 weeks of ART allowing for any interruptions in ART
4. Currently prescribed daily cotrimoxazole as primary prophylaxis
5. Parents or guardians, and children where appropriate according to age and knowledge of HIV status, must be willing and able to give informed consent for randomisation to stop or continue daily cotrimoxazole prophylaxis
6. If living in a malaria endemic area, has an insecticide treated bednet and prepared to use this for the child.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Likelihood of poor adherence
3. Presence of acute infection (e.g. malaria, helminthiasis, acute hepatitis, acute pneumonia, septicaemia, meningitis). Children may be admitted after recovery of an acute infection. Children with chronic lung disease, including recurrent respiratory infections, are eligible. Children with tuberculosis (TB) will not be enrolled while on the intensive phase of anti-tuberculosis therapy, but should be re-evaluated after the intensive phase and a decision made then about starting ART (see 4 below)
4. In receipt of medication contraindicated by ART
* children under three years of age receiving anti-tuberculosis therapy should not be enrolled (as they will have to receive nevirapine).
* on chemotherapy for malignancy
5. Laboratory abnormalities which are a contra-indication for the child to start ART (haemoglobin \<8.5g/dL; neutrophils \<0.50x109/L; aspartate transaminase (AST) or alanine transaminase (ALT) \>5 x the upper limit of normal (ULN); grade 3 renal dysfunction - creatinine \>1.9 x ULN).
N.B. causes of anaemia, such as concurrent bacterial infection, malaria, helminthiasis and/or malnutrition should be investigated, and treatment for anaemia and its causes commenced prior to re-screening for eligibility.
6. Being pregnant or breast-feeding an infant
7. Perinatal exposure to nevirapine (either through prevention of mother-to-child transmission (pMTCT) or breastfeeding) for children aged 3 - 6 months only
5. Likely to switch to second-line therapy in the next 12 weeks
7. Previous diagnosis of Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (cotrimoxazole is secondary prophylaxis and should not be discontinued)
3 Months
17 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Department for International Development, United Kingdom
OTHER_GOV
ViiV Healthcare
INDUSTRY
GlaxoSmithKline
INDUSTRY
Medical Research Council
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Diana M Gibb
Professor of Epidemiology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Diana M Gibb, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Medical Research Council
Peter Mugyenyi, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Joint Clinical Research Centre, Kampala, Uganda
Kusum Nathoo, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
Adeodata Kekitiinwa, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Baylor College of Medicine Children's Foundation, Mulago, Uganda
Paula Munderi, MBChB
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
MRC /UVRI Uganda Research Unit on AIDS, Entebbe, Uganda
Victor Musiime, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Joint Clinical Research Centre, Kampala, Uganda
Mutsa F Bwakura-Dangarembizi, MBChB
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
Philippa Musoke, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Baylor College of Medicine Children's Foundation, Mulago, Uganda
Sabrina Bakeera-Kitaka, MBChB
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Baylor College of Medicine Children's Foundation, Mulago, Uganda
Patricia Nahirya-Ntege, MBChB
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
MRC/UVRI and LSHTM Uganda Research Unit
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
MRC /UVRI Uganda Research Unit on AIDS
Entebbe, , Uganda
Joint Clinical Research Centre
Kampala, , Uganda
Baylor College of Medicine Children's Foundation
Mulago, , Uganda
University of Zimbabwe Medical School
Harare, , Zimbabwe
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
ARROW Trial team. Routine versus clinically driven laboratory monitoring and first-line antiretroviral therapy strategies in African children with HIV (ARROW): a 5-year open-label randomised factorial trial. Lancet. 2013 Apr 20;381(9875):1391-1403. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62198-9. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
Bwakura-Dangarembizi M, Kendall L, Bakeera-Kitaka S, Nahirya-Ntege P, Keishanyu R, Nathoo K, Spyer MJ, Kekitiinwa A, Lutaakome J, Mhute T, Kasirye P, Munderi P, Musiime V, Gibb DM, Walker AS, Prendergast AJ. A randomized trial of prolonged co-trimoxazole in HIV-infected children in Africa. N Engl J Med. 2014 Jan 2;370(1):41-53. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1214901.
Musiime V, Kasirye P, Naidoo-James B, Nahirya-Ntege P, Mhute T, Cook A, Mugarura L, Munjoma M, Thoofer NK, Ndashimye E, Nankya I, Spyer MJ, Thomason MJ, Snowden W, Gibb DM, Walker AS; ARROW Trial Team. Once vs twice-daily abacavir and lamivudine in African children. AIDS. 2016 Jul 17;30(11):1761-70. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001116.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
main ARROW trial webpage
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
24791884
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
G0300400
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
G0300400
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.