Feasibility Study for GORE® TAG® Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis to Treat Proximal Descending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms
NCT ID: NCT02021812
Last Updated: 2022-09-09
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
31 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-01-31
2022-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of the GORE TAG Thoracic Endoprosthesis in the Treatment of Aneurysms
NCT00590759
Thoracic Endoprosthesis for Treatment of Aneurysm of the Descending Thoracic Aortic
NCT00874250
GORE TAG® Thoracic Endoprosthesis - 45 mm for the Treatment of Aneurysms of the Descending Thoracic Aorta
NCT00608829
Evaluation of the GORE Conformable TAG® for Treatment of Traumatic Transection
NCT00917852
Evaluation of the GORE Conformable TAG® Thoracic Endoprosthesis for Treatment of Acute Complicated Type B Aortic Dissection
NCT00908388
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Branched TAG® Device
Treatment with the GORE® TAG® Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis
GORE® TAG® Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
GORE® TAG® Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Fusiform (≥ 55 mm), or
2. Fusiform (\>2 times native aortic diameter), or
3. Saccular (no diameter criteria)
2. Age ≥18 years at time of informed consent signature
3. Subject is capable of complying with protocol requirements, including follow-up
4. Informed Consent Form (ICF) is signed by Subject or legal representative
5. Must have appropriate proximal aortic landing zone, defined as:
1. Must require coverage of the left subclavian artery (LSA) origin for exclusion of the lesion
2. Aortic inner diameters between 16-48 mm
3. Landing zone, which must include the LSA ostium, cannot be aneurysmal, heavily calcified, or heavily thrombosed,
4. Acceptable proximal landing zone outer curvature length for the required device
5. Landing zone must be native aorta
6. Must have appropriate distal aortic landing zone, defined as:
1. Outer curvature length must be ≥2cm proximal to the celiac artery
2. Aortic inner diameters between 16-48mm (diameter should be between 16-42mm if using distal TAG® Device extension)
3. Landing zone cannot be aneurysmal, heavily calcified, or heavily thrombosed
4. Native aorta or previously implanted GORE® TAG® Device
7. Must have appropriate LSA landing zone, defined as:
1. LSA length of ≥3 cm proximal to first major branch vessel if using Aortic Component with 8 mm portal diameter, or LSA length of ≥2.5 cm proximal to first major branch vessel if using Aortic Component with 12 mm portal diameter
2. LSA inner diameters of 6-15 mm if using Aortic Component with 8 mm portal diameter, or inner diameters of 11-18 mm if using Aortic Component with 12 mm portal diameter
3. Target branch vessel landing zone cannot be aneurysmal, heavily calcified, or heavily thrombosed
Exclusion Criteria
2. Previous endovascular repair of the ascending aorta
3. Previous endovascular repair of the DTA with a non-Gore device
4. Surgery within 30 days of treatment
5. Infected aorta
6. Dissection of the DTA
7. Intramural hematoma of the DTA without DTA aneurysm
8. Life expectancy \<2 years
9. Myocardial infarction or stroke within 6 weeks prior to treatment
10. Patient has a systemic infection and may be at increased risk of endovascular graft infection
11. Pregnant female at time of informed consent signature
12. Degenerative connective tissue disease, e.g. Marfan's or Ehler-Danlos Syndrome
13. Participation in another drug or medical device study within one year of study enrollment
14. Known history of drug abuse within one year of treatment
15. Significant thrombus or atheroma in the aortic arch
16. Tortuous or stenotic iliac and/or femoral arteries preventing introducer sheath insertion and the inability to use a conduit for vascular access
17. Planned coverage of left carotid or celiac arteries
18. Patient has known sensitivities or allergies to the device materials
19. Patient has known hypersensitivity or contraindication to anticoagulants or contrast media, which is not amenable to pre-treatment
20. Previous instance of Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia type 2 (HIT-2) or known hypersensitivity to heparin
21. Diameter taper outside of the device sizing range between proximal and distal landing zones of aorta and the inability to use additional devices of different diameters to compensate for the taper
22. Mycotic aneurysm
23. Persistent refractory shock (systolic blood pressure \<90 mm Hg)
24. Patient has body habitus or other medical condition which prevents adequate visualization of the aorta
25. Aberrant right subclavian or left vertebral arteries
26. Occluded/stenosed/hypoplastic right vertebral artery
27. Presence of a patent left internal mammary artery (LIMA) graft
28. Bilateral carotid artery disease
29. Known incomplete Circle of Willis
30. Known left vertebral artery ending in posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
W.L.Gore & Associates
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael D Dake, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Stanford University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Leland Stanford Junior University
Stanford, California, United States
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Mayo Clinic - Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
The Hitchcock Foundation (Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center)
Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SSB 11-02
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.