Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
49 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2012-01-31
2015-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound, Endoleak Detection Following EVAR v1.3
NCT02688751
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Follow-up After Endovascular Repair by Non-invasive Vascular Elastography
NCT01907386
Computed Tomography Scan Versus Color Duplex Ultrasound for Surveillance of Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm. A Prospective Multicenter Study
NCT01230203
Fusion of CT Angiography With 3D Contrast Ultrasound as a Method for Follow up for Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
NCT04089241
Enhanced Guidance for Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
NCT01824654
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The following parameters will be acquired through the CQDSA for analysis.
1. Time-versus-ROI contrast intensity graph. The graph contains one endoleak ROI flow curve and one reference aortic flow curve (Ref). The x-axis shows time from 0 second to the maximum frame time of the image. The y-axis shows the sum of pixel intensities, namely total contrast, representing the contrast concentration within the ROI.
2. ROI Peak/Ref Peak. It is the ratio of intensity peak between the endoleak and the reference in the aorta.
3. ROI TTP (Time to peak). Peak time of ROI in the vicinity of endoleak entry.
4. ROI AUC/Ref AUC. Area under curve (AUC) is calculated through Time-versus-ROI contrast intensity graph. The parameter here is the ratio of ROI AUC in endoleak to the reference.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
none endoleak events
Patients who have no further endoleaks related adverse events including aneurysm enlargement and rupture or persistent endoleaks.
No interventions assigned to this group
Endoleak events
Patients who undergo endoleaks related adverse events or persistent endoleaks during follow up.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
1. undergo surgeries which involve the segment covered by EVAR;
2. present connective tissue disease, such as Marfan's Syndrome or vasculitis.
3. present abdominal aortic dissection.
4. present AAA rupture.
5. die from non aneurysm-reltated reasons or are lost during follow up.
18 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Siemens Ltd., China, Shanghai, China.
UNKNOWN
Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Zhenyu Shi
Associate Prof.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Weiguo Fu, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Zhongshan Hospital
Shanghai, , China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lederle FA, Johnson GR, Wilson SE, Chute EP, Littooy FN, Bandyk D, Krupski WC, Barone GW, Acher CW, Ballard DJ. Prevalence and associations of abdominal aortic aneurysm detected through screening. Aneurysm Detection and Management (ADAM) Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group. Ann Intern Med. 1997 Mar 15;126(6):441-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-126-6-199703150-00004.
Thompson AR, Cooper JA, Ashton HA, Hafez H. Growth rates of small abdominal aortic aneurysms correlate with clinical events. Br J Surg. 2010 Jan;97(1):37-44. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6779.
Brady AR, Thompson SG, Fowkes FG, Greenhalgh RM, Powell JT; UK Small Aneurysm Trial Participants. Abdominal aortic aneurysm expansion: risk factors and time intervals for surveillance. Circulation. 2004 Jul 6;110(1):16-21. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000133279.07468.9F. Epub 2004 Jun 21.
Reed WW, Hallett JW Jr, Damiano MA, Ballard DJ. Learning from the last ultrasound. A population-based study of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm. Arch Intern Med. 1997 Oct 13;157(18):2064-8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.157.18.2064.
Scott RA, Ashton HA, Lamparelli MJ, Harris GJ, Stevens JW. A 14-year experience with 6 cm as a criterion for surgical treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg. 1999 Oct;86(10):1317-21. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01227.x.
Scott RA, Wilson NM, Ashton HA, Kay DN. Is surgery necessary for abdominal aortic aneurysm less than 6 cm in diameter? Lancet. 1993 Dec 4;342(8884):1395-6. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92756-j.
Mortality results for randomised controlled trial of early elective surgery or ultrasonographic surveillance for small abdominal aortic aneurysms. The UK Small Aneurysm Trial Participants. Lancet. 1998 Nov 21;352(9141):1649-55.
Lederle FA, Wilson SE, Johnson GR, Reinke DB, Littooy FN, Acher CW, Ballard DJ, Messina LM, Gordon IL, Chute EP, Krupski WC, Busuttil SJ, Barone GW, Sparks S, Graham LM, Rapp JH, Makaroun MS, Moneta GL, Cambria RA, Makhoul RG, Eton D, Ansel HJ, Freischlag JA, Bandyk D; Aneurysm Detection and Management Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group. Immediate repair compared with surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2002 May 9;346(19):1437-44. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012573.
Moll FL, Powell JT, Fraedrich G, Verzini F, Haulon S, Waltham M, van Herwaarden JA, Holt PJ, van Keulen JW, Rantner B, Schlosser FJ, Setacci F, Ricco JB; European Society for Vascular Surgery. Management of abdominal aortic aneurysms clinical practice guidelines of the European society for vascular surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011 Jan;41 Suppl 1:S1-S58. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.09.011. No abstract available.
Jens S, Marquering HA, Koelemay MJ, Reekers JA. Perfusion angiography of the foot in patients with critical limb ischemia: description of the technique. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2015 Feb;38(1):201-5. doi: 10.1007/s00270-014-1036-5. Epub 2014 Dec 13.
Benndorf G. Color-coded digital subtraction angiography: the end of a monochromatic era? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010 May;31(5):925-7. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2077. Epub 2010 Apr 15. No abstract available.
Mehndiratta A, Knopp MV, Zechmann CM, Owsijewitsch M, von Tengg-Kobligk H, Zamecnik P, Kauczor HU, Choyke PL, Giesel FL. Comparison of diagnostic quality and accuracy in color-coded versus gray-scale DCE-MR imaging display. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2009 Sep;4(5):457-62. doi: 10.1007/s11548-009-0356-4. Epub 2009 Jun 4.
Tenjin H, Asakura F, Nakahara Y, Matsumoto K, Matsuo T, Urano F, Ueda S. Evaluation of intraaneurysmal blood velocity by time-density curve analysis and digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998 Aug;19(7):1303-7.
Strother CM, Bender F, Deuerling-Zheng Y, Royalty K, Pulfer KA, Baumgart J, Zellerhoff M, Aagaard-Kienitz B, Niemann DB, Lindstrom ML. Parametric color coding of digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010 May;31(5):919-24. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2020. Epub 2010 Feb 18.
Khanafer KM, Bull JL, Upchurch GR Jr, Berguer R. Turbulence significantly increases pressure and fluid shear stress in an aortic aneurysm model under resting and exercise flow conditions. Ann Vasc Surg. 2007 Jan;21(1):67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2006.10.009.
Hunter GJ, Hunter JV, Brown NJ. Parametric imaging using digital subtraction angiography. Br J Radiol. 1986 Jan;59(697):7-11. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-59-697-7.
Veith FJ, Baum RA, Ohki T, Amor M, Adiseshiah M, Blankensteijn JD, Buth J, Chuter TA, Fairman RM, Gilling-Smith G, Harris PL, Hodgson KJ, Hopkinson BR, Ivancev K, Katzen BT, Lawrence-Brown M, Meier GH, Malina M, Makaroun MS, Parodi JC, Richter GM, Rubin GD, Stelter WJ, White GH, White RA, Wisselink W, Zarins CK. Nature and significance of endoleaks and endotension: summary of opinions expressed at an international conference. J Vasc Surg. 2002 May;35(5):1029-35. doi: 10.1067/mva.2002.123095.
Hinnen JW, Koning OH, van Bockel JH, Hamming JF. Aneurysm sac pressure after EVAR: the role of endoleak. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007 Oct;34(4):432-41; discussion 442-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2007.05.022. Epub 2007 Aug 1.
Zhou M, Su Z, Shi Z, Fu W, Meng X, Wang Y, Guo B, Huang K. Application of color-coded quantitative digital subtraction angiography in predicting the outcomes of immediate type I and type III endoleaks. J Vasc Surg. 2017 Sep;66(3):760-767. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.11.048. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CQDSA_EVAR
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.