Efficacy of Biomarkers and CEUS Versus CTA in AAA Follow-up Post-EVAR
NCT ID: NCT06866769
Last Updated: 2025-03-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
60 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-07-25
2028-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound, Endoleak Detection Following EVAR v1.3
NCT02688751
Secondary Intervention and Surveillance After EVAR
NCT05335642
Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms
NCT06267573
Fusion of CT Angiography With 3D Contrast Ultrasound as a Method for Follow up for Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
NCT04089241
Development of Novel Imaging Markers Predicting the Progression of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Using 3D Computed Tomography
NCT04333641
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients with AAA who have undergone EVAR of the abdominal aortic aneurysm require indefinite follow-up since a 4-year complication rate after EVAR of up to 40% has been described in some series.
In some patients a decrease in the diameters of the residual aneurysm sac after EVAR has been described, which is known as remodeling.
CTA is the gold standard imaging technique for the follow-up of these patients, although it has the disadvantage of using ionizing radiation and iodinated contrasts that are nephrotoxic and can produce hypersensitivity reactions. Furthermore, there is no consensus on which protocol is the most suitable (one phase, two phases or three phases). Currently, in our hospital, three-phase CTA is being performed, as well as CTA with the Split Bolus technique, which allows the acquisition of images in arterial and venous phases in a single acquisition, thus reducing radiation doses; a correlation between both techniques of 85.7-100% and a decrease in radiation doses of between 30-78% has been described.
An alternative to CTA is CEUS that presents a sensitivity of 90.5% (22-100%) and a specificity of 90.65% (71-100%) for the detection of endoleaks. It is a technique that does not use ionizing radiation; furthermore, ultrasound contrasts are not nephrotoxic and hypersensitivity reactions to them are exceptional. In addition, there are publications concerning the determination of biomarkers in the follow-up of patients with AAA both before and after treatment with EVAR.
Hypothesis:
Performing CEUS together with biomarker determination in patients with AAA treated by EVAR would allow reducing the number of CTA to these patients; and, therefore, radiation doses and the use of iodinated contrasts that may cause nephrotoxicity, as well as hypersensitivity reactions.
Primary objectives:
1. \- To determine whether the combination of biomarker levels together with CEUS in the follow-up of treated AAA patients is as effective as performing CTA to detect endoleaks.
2. \- To validate the usefulness of CEUS together with biomarker determination in the follow-up of these patients.
Secondary Objectives:
1.- To determine the cost-effectiveness of biomarkers in the follow-up of these patients.
To establish a protocol for the follow-up of patients with AAA treated with EVAR, including biomarkers and CEUS.
3.-To reduce radiation doses in the follow-up of patients with AAA treated with EVAR.
Methodology:
Prospective observational study. Biomarker levels will be determined before (within 30 days prior to the procedure) and after stent implantation (24-48 h, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year) together with contrast echography. In addition, a control CTA will be performed to validate concordance. These biomarkers will be analyzed comparing the values obtained in patients with endoleaks versus patients without endoleaks, as well as in those with aneurysm remodeling.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Study cohort
Inclusion Criteria:
* patients with AAA under follow-up who are going to be treated with EVAR.
* signed informed consent to perform CTA, CEUS and for the determination of biomarkers.
Exclusion Criteria:
* patients with inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms or ruptured aneurysm.
CTA
The levels of biomarkers are determined before (within 30 days prior to the procedure) and after the implantation of the stent (24-48 hours, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and at 1 year), along with the performance of a contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Additionally, a follow-up CT angiography is performed to validate the concordance, that is, to assess if there are changes in the biomarker values determined one month after the implantation of the stent compared to the baseline values that may suggest the presence of complications (endoleaks, infection, thrombosis, etc.).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
CTA
The levels of biomarkers are determined before (within 30 days prior to the procedure) and after the implantation of the stent (24-48 hours, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and at 1 year), along with the performance of a contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Additionally, a follow-up CT angiography is performed to validate the concordance, that is, to assess if there are changes in the biomarker values determined one month after the implantation of the stent compared to the baseline values that may suggest the presence of complications (endoleaks, infection, thrombosis, etc.).
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* signed informed consent to perform CTA, CEUS and for the determination of biomarkers.
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria La Fe
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Juan Manuel Sanchís García
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hospital Universitario La Fe
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital La Fe
Valencia, Valencia, Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
EVAR
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.