Jugular Venous Flow Healthy Volunteers

NCT ID: NCT02002494

Last Updated: 2020-06-04

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

27 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-06-30

Study Completion Date

2014-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Our hypothesis is that there will be a decrease in internal jugular venous flow in the park bench position when compared to the supine position. There will also be a change in blood flow in the between right and left internal jugular veins in park bench position, particularly there will be a greater reduction of flow on the dependent side. However, the internal jugular venous flow will be the same in both the prone and supine position.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The different positions used in neurosurgery (park bench, prone) for better accessibility to the operating field can impact on the cerebral venous drainage due to the effects of internal jugular venous outflow of blood and may increase intracranial pressure. The kinking of the internal jugular vein due to excessive neck flexion and rotation in park bench or flexion in the prone position may lead to kinking or twisting of the vein. This has been hypothesized as the major cause of disturbed venous drainage during surgery and in postoperative patients may lead to neck swelling, brachial plexus injury, macroglossia (swollen tongue), delayed airway obstruction and increases in intracranial pressure.

Optimal brain perfusion is best in the neutral position of the head, but surgery cannot always be performed with this. Thus, we look to measure the internal jugular venous flow at different positions as there have been little studies looking at this important contributing factor.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Jugular Venous Blood Flow

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

volunteers in different positions

The following will be compared in the same volunteer:

* Bilateral internal jugular venous flow in supine and prone position
* Bilateral internal jugular venous flow in supine and park bench position
* Bilateral internal jugular venous flow in prone and park bench

Different positions

Intervention Type OTHER

Jugular venous blood flow in healthy volunteers in 3 different positions- supine, prone and park bench

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Different positions

Jugular venous blood flow in healthy volunteers in 3 different positions- supine, prone and park bench

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult healthy volunteers who are above the age of 18
* American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (ASA) 1
* Body mass index (BMI) less than and equal to 35

Exclusion Criteria

* ASA 2 and above
* BMI above 35
* Lack of informed consent
* Language barrier
* Medical students and anaesthesia residents going through the department as part of their rotation
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Health Network, Toronto

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Lashmi Venkatraghavan

Dr.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Lashmi Venkatraghavan

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Health Network, Toronto Western Hospital

Vincent Chan

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Health Network, Toronto Western Hospital

Pirjo Manninen

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Health Network, Toronto Western Hospital

Audrey MY Tan

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Health Network, Toronto Western Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Health Network, Toronto Western Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

13-6244-BE

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.