Evaluation of Immediate v. Delayed CT/NG Test for Treatment in the ED
NCT ID: NCT01989130
Last Updated: 2019-08-13
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
70 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-10-31
2015-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Utility of Rapid CT/NG Testing in the ED
NCT02200224
Response Rate to Ceftriaxone 1g IM in Gonorrhoea : a French Retrospective Monocentric Study
NCT04902560
Experimental Human Infection With Neisseria Gonorrhoeae
NCT03840811
Antenatal Chlamydia Trachomatis and Neisseria Gonorrhoeae Testing to Prevent Adverse Neonatal Consequences
NCT04955717
Trial Comparing Ceftriaxone Plus Azithromycin Versus Ceftriaxone for the Treatment of Gonorrhea
NCT05027516
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A validation of the Cepheid CT/NG test will be conducted against the hospital standard of care on \</= 40 pilot participants. Pilot participants will be asked to provide 2 endocervical swabs and a urine specimen. All surveys and interviews will be conducted on pilot patients.
While many outcomes can be measured in this study, the investigators will power this study to reduce the overtreatment rate with antibiotics. Assuming a baseline overtreatment rate of 88% (# treated with antibiotics/# without disease), to reduce this rate by 50% (to 44%), at a power of 80% and alpha of 0.05, the investigators will need to enroll 42 patients (21 controls and 21 study patients) with negative tests. Given an estimated positive rate of 6%, and that approximately 50% of patients who receive these tests for any reason will be treated empirically with antibiotics, the investigators think that enrolling a total of 70 patients with full data (enrollment survey, clinician survey, and follow up survey) would be sufficient to identify trends with this subject matter. Due to the sensitive nature of the subject matter and the high percentages of lost-to-follow up with ED patients, the investigators estimate approximately 50% will have incomplete data. Therefore, the investigators request to enroll 150 patients in the study.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Real-time results with Cepheid Xpert CT/NG Test
Diagnosis of +/- CT/NG within 2 hours of specimen entering laboratory
Cepheid Xpert CT/NG Test
Batched results with Roche AMPLICOR CT/NG test
Diagnosis of +/- CT/NG within 1 to 4 days of visit to the ED
Roche AMPLICOR CT/NG
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Roche AMPLICOR CT/NG
Cepheid Xpert CT/NG Test
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* clinical suspicion of CT/NG
* able to give informed consent
* willingness to wait for test result
Exclusion Criteria
* pregnancy
* prisoners
* unable to give informed consent
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cepheid
INDUSTRY
George Washington University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Larissa May, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
George Washington University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The George Washington University Hospital
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Andric B, Drowos J, Trepka MJ, Suciu G, Alonso A, Hennekens CH. High frequencies of negative pretreatment results following presumptive antibiotic treatment for chlamydia and gonorrhea. South Med J. 2013 May;106(5):321-6. doi: 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e318291b3c2.
Levitt MA, Johnson S, Engelstad L, Montana R, Stewart S. Clinical management of chlamydia and gonorrhea infection in a county teaching emergency department--concerns in overtreatment, undertreatment, and follow-up treatment success. J Emerg Med. 2003 Jul;25(1):7-11. doi: 10.1016/s0736-4679(03)00131-8.
Gaydos CA, Van Der Pol B, Jett-Goheen M, Barnes M, Quinn N, Clark C, Daniel GE, Dixon PB, Hook EW 3rd; CT/NG Study Group. Performance of the Cepheid CT/NG Xpert Rapid PCR Test for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Jun;51(6):1666-72. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03461-12. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
May L, Ware CE, Jordan JA, Zocchi M, Zatorski C, Ajabnoor Y, Pines JM. A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Treatment of Patients Tested for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea After a Rapid Polymerase Chain Reaction Test Versus Standard of Care Testing. Sex Transm Dis. 2016 May;43(5):290-5. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000438.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
071346
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.