Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
511 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-08-31
2013-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Hypothesis 1a: It is feasible to implement M-DART in remote, poverty stricken, high-HIV prevalence rural communities in western Kenya.
Hypothesis 1b: M-DART will be a more effective strategy than standard of care (High-Risk Express Care) in reducing mortality and LTFU in patients at the highest risk of dying following ART initiation.
Hypothesis 2: M-DART will be cost effective over the 48-week study period
Hypothesis 3a: Patients enrolled in M-DART will have higher quality of life scores at 24 and 48 weeks as compared to the control patients.
Hypothesis 3b: Patients enrolled in M-DART will have lower HIV related stigma scores at 24 and 48-weeks as compared to the control patients.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The USAID-AMPATH Partnership (AMPATH) has enrolled \>118,000 HIV-infected patients across 60 urban and rural care sites in western Kenya, \>65,000 of whom have initiated ART. To date, \>9,000 patients have been confirmed dead, half of whom were on ART. Many more are LTFU, unknown whether they are still alive or not. AMPATH is uniquely placed to perform care intervention trials targeting reduction in mortality and LTFU because:
1. There are sufficient study subjects;
2. It has a protocol-driven care program that will enable the establishment of a control group that is cared for in a standard fashion;
3. The AMPATH Medical Record System (AMRS), a fully computerized system containing \>80 million observations collected prospectively for \>3.0 million visits will provide easy data storage and retrieval;
4. Experienced investigators from the Moi and Indiana University Schools of Medicine and the World Bank will ensure that the study is executed within acceptable clinical trial standards and in a timely fashion; and
5. It has effective community outreach programs which will increase the chances of the study's acceptability in the community, hence its success.
We propose to perform a randomized clinical trial that will compare the effectiveness of a home-based modified directly observed ART treatment strategy to clinic-based standard of care in reducing both mortality and LTFU soon after ART is initiated. A similar cadre of clinicians will be used for home-based as for clinic-based care in order to enhance comparability of outcomes. A cost effectiveness analysis of the intervention will be performed. The patients' quality of life and perceived HIV stigma will be assessed at study enrollment, 24 and 48 weeks. We will perform the study in two of the remotest AMPATH care sites that have very high HIV-prevalence in the hope that the study's results, if positive, will impact care in communities that need it the most.
2\. Specific Aims High mortality and LTFU rates soon after HIV-infected patients initiate ART are two major challenges facing HIV treatment and care programs in sub-Saharan Africa. In the first year of ART, mortality in African patients is as high as 26% despite appropriate treatment. The majority of these deaths occur in the first six months. This mortality rate is 5 - 8 times higher than for similar patients in the developed world. The risk factors for mortality in African patients initiating ART have been well elucidated. These risk factors include: late patient presentation with severe immune degradation and clinically advanced HIV disease; active or latent infections such as tuberculosis, invasive bacterial and fungal; anaemia; malnutrition; care in lower level and fee-for-service centers; male gender; and poor adherence to ART. Similarly, LTFU rates are high. Some care programs have reported LTFU rates as high as 40% in the first 12 months of ART. The risk factors for LTFU have also been reported and some mirror those for death. Recently published data indicate that unreported deaths might be the biggest reason for LTFU. With such abundant knowledge on risk factors for death and LTFU after ART initiation, what is now required is the development, implementation and evaluation of novel treatment and care strategies that target specific risk factors with the aim of mitigating these twin challenges.
The United States Agency for International Development - Academic Model Providing Access to Healthcare (USAID-AMPATH Partnership) is one of the largest public HIV treatment and care programs in sub-Saharan Africa. With care centers in Western, Nyanza and North Rift Valley provinces of Kenya, AMPATH has enrolled over 118,000 HIV-infected patients in 60 urban and rural care sites. Of these patients, \>65,000 have initiated ART. To date, more than 9,000 of the \>118,000 AMPATH-enrolled HIV-infected patients have been confirmed dead, including more than 5,000 on ART. Current AMPATH's annual LTFU rate is estimated at 8% for patients on ART and 13% for those not on ART. AMPATH's long-term objective is to improve ART outcomes for HIV-infected African patients through the development of replicable, sustainable, cost-effective treatment and care strategies that prevent mortality and prolong survival. Through this proposed research, we would like to study the usefulness of an intensive, nurse-directed, home-centered, modified (three times per week) treatment and follow-up strategy for newly enrolled, HIV-infected, ART-naïve patients at the highest risk of dying after initiating ART. The central hypothesis in this application is that the vast majority of deaths in HIV-infected African patients on ART can be prevented by early identification and aggressive management of HIV- and ART-related complications through close patient monitoring. The rationale behind this proposal is that interventions to interrupt early death in HIV-infected patients on ART are more likely to succeed if HIV and ART-related complications are identified early and appropriate interventions instituted promptly. Furthermore, solutions to HIV care and treatment challenges in sub-Saharan Africa are more likely to be attained if the research conducted addresses the region's specific healthcare needs and the results of such research can be translated into local practice. We plan to accomplish our objective by pursuing the following three specific aims:
1. To develop and implement an intensive, nurse-directed, home-centered, modified directly observed antiretroviral therapy (M-DART) care strategy for high-risk HIV-infected patients initiating ART in remote locations in western Kenya and compare this to the current AMPATH standard of care (High-Risk Express Care).
* Hypothesis 1a: It is feasible to implement M-DART in remote, poverty stricken, high-HIV prevalence rural communities in western Kenya.
* Hypothesis 1b: M-DART will be a more effective strategy than standard of care (High-Risk Express Care) in reducing mortality and LTFU in patients at the highest risk of dying following ART initiation.
2. To determine the costs effectiveness of M-DART
• Hypothesis 2: M-DART will be cost effective over the 48-week study period
3. To determine patients' perception of quality of life and stigma following implementation of M-DART.
* Hypothesis 3a: Patients enrolled in M-DART will have higher quality of life scores at 24 and 48 weeks as compared to the control patients.
* Hypothesis 3b: Patients enrolled in M-DART will have lower HIV related stigma scores at 24 and 48-weeks as compared to the control patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Home visits
Minimal physical examination at home Drug adherence/pill counts
Home visits
The participants' vital signs (blood pressure, temperature, pulse rate, respiratory rate, and arterial oxygen saturation) will be taken and a limited physical examination (e.g. oral cavity for thrush, Kaposi's lesions, ulcers and dehydration; skin for rash, herpes zoster and dehydration; eyes for jaundice and pallor, gross neurological function such as ability to walk without difficulty, presence of facial droop, one-sided body weakness etc.) conducted. The nurse will then review medications adherence before observing the study participant swallow their pills (antiretrovirals, anti-TB, antibiotics, and analgesics).
Control
Normal standard of care
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Home visits
The participants' vital signs (blood pressure, temperature, pulse rate, respiratory rate, and arterial oxygen saturation) will be taken and a limited physical examination (e.g. oral cavity for thrush, Kaposi's lesions, ulcers and dehydration; skin for rash, herpes zoster and dehydration; eyes for jaundice and pallor, gross neurological function such as ability to walk without difficulty, presence of facial droop, one-sided body weakness etc.) conducted. The nurse will then review medications adherence before observing the study participant swallow their pills (antiretrovirals, anti-TB, antibiotics, and analgesics).
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Newly diagnosed HIV-infected patients
2. Age \>14 years
3. CD4 count \<100 cells/ml
4. ART naïve
Exclusion Criteria
2. Refusal to consent to the study
14 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
FED
Moi University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
ABRAHAM M. SIIKA, MBChB, MMed, MS
Associate Professor of Medicine
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Abraham M Siika, MBCHB,MMED,MS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Moi University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital
Eldoret, Rift Valley, Kenya
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AID-623-A-00-08-00003
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id