Edwards SAPIEN-3 Periprosthetic Leakage Evaluation Versus Medtronic CoreValve in Transfemoral Aortic Valve Implantation

NCT ID: NCT01982032

Last Updated: 2018-11-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

56 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-11-30

Study Completion Date

2017-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a good alternative treatment for patients with severe aortic valve stenosis with similar mid-term success rates as compared to surgery. Periprosthetic aortic regurgitation (PAR) after TAVR remains an important limitation of this technique. Moderate to severe PAR occurs in 15-45% of the cases and it is an independent predictor of mortality after TAVR. Little is known about potential differences in severity of PAR among different types of aortic valve prosthesis. The current randomized study aims to evaluate potential differences between the Edwards SAPIEN bioprosthesis and the Medtronic CoreValve® system with main focus on PAR and additional focus on other clinical and imaging endpoints. Primary objective of this study is to investigate the difference in the severity of PAR, measured with 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (3DTEE), between patients undergoing the implantation of the Edwards SAPIEN bioprosthesis versus patients receiving the Medtronic CoreValve® bioprosthesis. Secondary objectives of this study include: investigating the value of different imaging modalities in evaluating periprosthetic regurgitation after TAVR and studying the difference in clinical endpoints according to VARC-2 definitions and quality of life after TAVR between two available aortic valve prostheses.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Periprosthetic Aortic Valve Regurgitation After TAVI

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Edwards SAPIEN bioprosthesis

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement with an Edwards SAPIEN bioprosthesis

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Edwards SAPIEN bioprosthesis

Intervention Type DEVICE

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement with an Edwards SAPIEN bioprosthesis

Medtronic CoreValve® system

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the Medtronic CoreValve system

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Medtronic CoreValve system

Intervention Type DEVICE

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the Medtronic CoreValve system

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Medtronic CoreValve system

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the Medtronic CoreValve system

Intervention Type DEVICE

Edwards SAPIEN bioprosthesis

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement with an Edwards SAPIEN bioprosthesis

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

In order to be eligible to participate in this study, subjects must meet all of the following criteria:

* Patient is ≥18 years of age and diagnosed with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis, judged inoperable or at high surgical risk (EuroSCORE \> 15% or other criteria that make surgery high risk by a consensus among cardiologists and cardiac surgeons in the heart team) and deemed eligible for transfemoral-TAVI.
* Aortic annulus diameter ≥ 18 and ≤ 29 mm as assessed with MSCT.
* No contraindications to study requirements such as MRI or TEE.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients unable or unwilling to give informed consent.
* Patients who are excluded from this study because of the size of their aortic annulus diameter.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

UMC Utrecht

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Pieter Stella

Interventional Cardiologist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Pieter Stella, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

UMC Utrecht

Pierfrancesco Agostoni, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

UMC Utrecht

Nynke Kooistra, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

UMC Utrecht

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Medical Center Utrecht

Utrecht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kooistra NHM, Abawi M, Voskuil M, Urgel K, Samim M, Nijhoff F, Nathoe HM, Doevendans PAFM, Chamuleau SAJ, Leenders GEH, Leiner T, Abrahams AC, van der Worp HB, Agostoni P, Stella PR. Randomised comparison of a balloon-expandable and self-expandable valve with quantitative assessment of aortic regurgitation using magnetic resonance imaging. Neth Heart J. 2020 May;28(5):253-265. doi: 10.1007/s12471-020-01414-0.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32246266 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NL43116.041.13

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The ENCIRCLE Trial
NCT04153292 RECRUITING NA