Outcomes After Centrifugation Versus PureGraft for Fatgrafting to the Breast

NCT ID: NCT01979757

Last Updated: 2013-11-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-04-30

Study Completion Date

2013-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Breast-conserving treatment (BCT) leads to a progressive and deteriorating breast deformity. Fatgrafting is ideal for breast reconstruction after BCT. The most frequently utilized technique for fat processing is centrifugation. The PureGraft device (Cytori Therapeutics, USA) is a new method that involves washing and filtering the fat to prepare the graft. The investigators compared the subjective and objective outcomes of two fat-processing methods, centrifugation and PureGraft filtration.

Thirty patients underwent breast reconstruction performed by a single surgeon (OM) after BCT in our department between April 2011 and September 2012. The patients were preoperatively divided into two groups randomly: 15 received fatgrafts processed by centrifugation, and 15 received fatgrafts processed by washing in PureGraft bags. The patients were followed up for 12-30 months.To measure the subjective outcome, the investigators distributed the BREAST-Q questionnaire to all the patients both preoperatively and one year postoperatively. The BCCT.core software evaluated the objective outcome of breast reconstruction by fatgrafting.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Fatgrafting to a Breast After Breast Conserving Therapy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Centrifugation

Patients recieved fatgraft processed by Centrifugation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Centrifugation

Intervention Type OTHER

Puregraft

Patients recieved fatgraft processed by Puregraft

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Puregraft

Intervention Type OTHER

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Puregraft

Intervention Type OTHER

Centrifugation

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* State after breast conserving therapy
Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bulovka Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ondrej Mestak M.D.

Consultant

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ondrej Mestak, M.D.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Charles University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Bulovka Hospital

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Czechia

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

268011

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CentPure

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id